PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) (https://www.pprune.org/professional-pilot-training-includes-ground-studies-14/)
-   -   Difference between LPC and LST? (https://www.pprune.org/professional-pilot-training-includes-ground-studies/473098-difference-between-lpc-lst.html)

Ethiopia 2nd January 2012 05:46

Difference between LPC and LST?
 
Hi,

This may sound like a stupid question, but in my country we don't use this particular nomenclature and would like to make sure I get the meaning of these two acronyms correct. For now I could only find:

LST: License Skill Test
LPC: License Proficiency Check

Could you please tell me, what corresponds to:

ATPL Skill test? (LST in my opinion)
Initial Type Rating Issue? (LST?)
Type Rating Renewal? (LPC?)
Operator Proficiency Check (None of these two?)

Johnny Tightlips 2nd January 2012 08:09


ATPL Skill test? (LST in my opinion)
Initial Type Rating Issue? (LST?)
Type Rating Renewal? (LPC?)
Operator Proficiency Check (None of these two?)
You are correct on all of these. An OPC has to be done every six months so once year it's just the OPC on it's own and the for the other sim you would do a combined LPC/OPC.

BillieBob 2nd January 2012 20:08

Always a good idea to consult the source document, in this case JAR-FCL 1.001.


Proficiency checks: Demonstrations of skill to revalidate or renew ratings, and including such oral examination as the examiner may require.

Skill tests: Skill tests are demonstrations of skill for licence or rating issue, including such oral examination as the examiner may require.

MrAverage 3rd January 2012 11:55

BillieBob

I was assured by a Panel Examiner that, at least in the UK, an LPC is for revalidation and an LST for renewal. Kind of contradicts your quote but seems logical.

mad_jock 3rd January 2012 12:07

The only difference between an LPC and LST is the fact you need to do a raw data ILS intercept I think with a LST.

BillieBob 3rd January 2012 16:39


Kind of contradicts your quote but seems logical.
It might seem logical to you but it is, nevertheless, incorrect, as is reference to a 'Panel Examiner' - the Panel of Examiners ceased to exist on the implementation of JAR-FCL, almost 15 years ago. I suggest you refer the FIE in question to JAR-FCL 1.001 and/or FCL.010 so that he can bring himself up to date and avoid making such mistakes in the future.

mad_jock 4th January 2012 02:06

Which is never going to happen billie bob as you well know. Hence the training for examinor which so many students have to deal with for there CPL and IR.

Ethiopia 4th January 2012 05:07

Many thanks for all your help, the issue is now clear.

Have a good day.

Halfwayback 4th January 2012 09:20

I'm glad you got your answer so I'm closing the thread.

HWB


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:21.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.