Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

ATPL Old syllabus UK CAA

Old 22nd Jan 2021, 18:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Oxford, uk
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATPL Old syllabus UK CAA

Dont know if there is anybody else in the same position as me? Was ready to sit my first ATPL exams in Jan which were cancelled due to the national lockdowns. Cant even book for Feb or March now as the online portal is locked. I have to sit atleast one exam before 31st of March to remain on the sylabus I've been taught (old syllabus), otherwise I'll have to sit 'New syllabus' exams which I'm not prepared for.

Doesn't look like lockdown will be eased anytime soon and the CAA said they wont extend the deadline of March 31st, which makes it near impossible to sit an exam before then.
oxford_flyer is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2021, 22:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How different is the new syllabus?
Not suprised of their attitude, shocking.
numerous I waited more than 30mins in the queue on telephone to talk to someone.

I think they need to start looking at online proctored exams, we can't go on waiting for the 'normality' to return.
will the CAA realize this?
wassupman is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2021, 20:37
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Oxford, uk
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good to know I'm not the only one! There is a discussion on the ATPL FB group that the CAA has consulted ATO's about the situation regarding extending the ECQB06 deadline but have met resistance from some ATO's. It's incredibly frustrating to say the least as this directly affects us students who are in the middle of this. How the CAA cant see that it's almost impossible to meet this cut-off date with exam centres closed, is beyond me.
oxford_flyer is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2021, 06:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 71
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 12 Posts
My comment to the CAA was that not extending was unfair to students who, through no fault of their own, could not sit whatever exams they need. Otherwise, no problem for us because we cover both syllabuses.

In theory, if you know your stuff, you shouldn't notice any difference, which is the name of the game - they are trying to stop the database queens, and having some success by all accounts. That said, I have noticed a couple of comouter questions in which all answers are potentially correct. Go figure.

Now that Brits are not allowed on the expert database (and therefore cannot write questions), I suspect that the questions will get worse
paco is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2021, 10:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Europe
Age: 32
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paco
In theory, if you know your stuff, you shouldn't notice any difference, which is the name of the game - they are trying to stop the database queens, and having some success by all accounts.
That argument is completely detached from reality. The exams are a tedious exercise which really don't prove much of how the state of real knowledge of the student is.

For God's sake, I remember that some exam questions required to use the 1 hPa = 27 ft assumption, while other questions required 30 ft. Depending on which assumption you used you could get one answer or another. There are plenty of things like these in the ATPL exams. I have a folder full of stupidly worded and plain wrong exam questions which only confuse students who know their stuff.

You need to sit those exams having done the questionbanks. It doesn't matter how well you've studied the books. If you don't go through the question banks you will not pass those exams.
Central Scrutinizer is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2021, 10:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,801
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In theory, if you know your stuff, you shouldn't notice any difference, which is the name of the game - they are trying to stop the database queens, and having some success by all accounts.
Part of the issue seems to be that, if an ATO was unwise enough to write their new syllabus training material to only satisfy the published learning objectives, their students come unstuck in exams because of the liberal interpretation the EASA examiners apply to those LOs. For instance in the new syllabus SSR and DME are taken back to PPL level, do we really think they have ditched all the detailed questions they had in ECQB 6/7? Based on past performance I don't trust them to have done that. I have also identified ATOs teaching for new syllabus exams with old syllabus material - there has been stuff added in!
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2021, 11:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 71
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 12 Posts
I don't trust them either (jet based questions in the CBIR?), which is why we cover both. It is sadly still true that you cannot pass the exams without a nod to a database of some sort, but equally, I would not like to be treated by a doctor who just learned the answers to the questions (and they have a similar database). I'll say it again, like I said in the meetings - we really need some people like Roger Henshaw or Pete Knapp to go through the database, without any bias. As far as I am concerned, the State's job is to ensure that candidates have a good safe knowledge on which to build - anything else like too much detail or KSA 100 has no value at all.
paco is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2021, 11:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Central Scrutinizer is spot-on. Everyone knows that the whole EASA exam system is mostly a waste of time and has been for a while. The FAA exams are also stupid but at least they are easy. I think we should ditch multiple choice and question banks and go back to written answers / essays e.g. "explain how X works in 500 words", as well as oral Q and A. Students would then have to actually understand the material in order to pass.
Booglebox is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2021, 12:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,801
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah a brilliant plan, but who is going to mark these essay answers? The CAA don't have the expertise or the capacity, nor do either the EASA Member States or EASA themselves. Even at our little exam centre in Clevedon the candidates routinely sit 300+ papers between them in a week of exams.
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2021, 14:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 71
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 12 Posts
Given that we have this KSA 100 nonsense I would do what the FAA/TC do and have an oral exam at the time of the checkride. This is what we will eventually be substituting our mock exams for. One big downside to that is that there is no standardisation across EASA for TREs/examiners - in Canada it is superb.
paco is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2021, 17:52
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Oxford, uk
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are sitting exams based on ECQB6, do you still need to do this KSA100 exam?



No news from CAA regarding extension. Currently only one exam slot available before March 31st on the portal which is in Scotland, and cant be booked...
oxford_flyer is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2021, 22:35
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,801
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, KSA only applies to the new syllabus. A huge EU/EASA mistake, it could have been so much better. As indeed could the new syllabus exams have been. Another opportunity lost in a downward spiral of incompetence.
Alex Whittingham is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.