ATPL help
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Oahu
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
in terms of studying time table how do those in the same situation cope with the stresses of the atpls, i have been told of stories where people have studies 5/6 hours per day 7 days a week for 6 months or stories of those who 3 months prior to the exams have hammered the bank and passed, when asked how much of the bank info came up in the exams have been told 60% or more...
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I were you I wouldn't worry so much, you've just started, all the info is coming at you at a pace faster than you can cope with etc etc ... really it is a situation we have all been in. The key to it is first believe you can do it, and second to literally keep telling yourself that and actually do it.
If you start now with the questions, getting familiar with them, knowing exactly what they want, speaking to people who are taking their exams now, asking if there are any differences (but do beware of some who will exaggerate the difficulty of their exam to make it sound like they were extra good to have passed it) and constantly working to it you'll be fine. You aren't the first and you won't be the last ... just use the resources wisely
If you start now with the questions, getting familiar with them, knowing exactly what they want, speaking to people who are taking their exams now, asking if there are any differences (but do beware of some who will exaggerate the difficulty of their exam to make it sound like they were extra good to have passed it) and constantly working to it you'll be fine. You aren't the first and you won't be the last ... just use the resources wisely
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Oahu
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the question is what info to remember and attain lol, we all have the believe to do it as i believe....constantly working does that mean 5/6 hours per day 7 days a week for the next 6 months, as some people have said...
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Spain
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In theory all information should be remembered but realistically this isn't possible. I am yet to start my ATPL but from what I understand, once you have covered all the material the QBs serve as a good guide on the type of questions and their wording.
The amount of hours you spend a day will depend on how fast you want to get it done. Some people have gotten it done in as little as 4 months spending 6-7 hours a day while others spend 2 hours a day to get it done in 12 months.
The amount of hours you spend a day will depend on how fast you want to get it done. Some people have gotten it done in as little as 4 months spending 6-7 hours a day while others spend 2 hours a day to get it done in 12 months.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Oahu
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i envy those whom can remember the info lol, im still struggling trying to remember what i learnt last week...spending 6/7 hours a day on the bank does not mean passing the real easa exams as many have said, as that on the day of the exams one may get a new influx of questions or if lucky the ones from the bank...
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: FL060
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After working all day at my paying job, I could only do MAX 2 hours of quality studying/QBs. Weekends were 4 hours/day. I would not start an exam block until I felt 90% certain I would pass. I think doing 6-7 hours a day "banking" is too much; my mind would starting getting dull over that period of time and frustration sets in (has it, already?)
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: looking for a cockpit
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally for me I'm completely overwhelmed on the ATPL
If we were allowed more sessions it would help as I wouldn't have to prepare 4 subjects all at once and could actually learn the material better
The way it is now I have no choice but to question bank
Trying to remember all that information for 4 subjects is just a crazy amount of info to retain
Today on my real exam I took I got questions wrong that I shouldn't have because I'm so overloaded from all the studying
Maybe I'm just not naturally good at studying but it's definitely excessive the volume of information Easa wants us to know and on top of that I have to take multiple subjects all in the same week
If we were allowed more sessions it would help as I wouldn't have to prepare 4 subjects all at once and could actually learn the material better
The way it is now I have no choice but to question bank
Trying to remember all that information for 4 subjects is just a crazy amount of info to retain
Today on my real exam I took I got questions wrong that I shouldn't have because I'm so overloaded from all the studying
Maybe I'm just not naturally good at studying but it's definitely excessive the volume of information Easa wants us to know and on top of that I have to take multiple subjects all in the same week
It's not supposed to be easy! Doing three at a time makes it manageable, you can roll any fails over. I did 4,4,3,3. I found I couldn't study after a days work, I had to take time off work. One week per subject is achievable if you study correctly.
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know what ground school is like, and it was without a doubt the most intense six months of my life. Significantly more stressful than school and University. Like Rudestuff says, it's not supposed to be easy. One of my friends in the USA was studying to be a doctor, and he complained to his professor about why he had to study calculus as part of his medical degree. The professor replied "It's to stop morons becoming doctors!". Take it as you like, but ATPLs will inevitably need a lot of blood, sweat and tears. I probably averaged six hours per day of studying for six months. It is, and will be very hard work. I could count the days I had off during that period on one hand. I feel for you guys because from what I hear, ATPLs are much harder than they were a year or so ago.
When I was there the instructors toed the party line and told us to stay away from question banks, as they claimed learning the content through the books was the most effective way to get through the exams. This was very bad advice. In both the school exams and EASAs, the ones who didn't use question banks (or spent very little time using one) ALWAYS had the lowest scores. Question banks are a weapon in your arsenal, so use them IN ADDITION TO proper study.
What I will say is that it would be very, very foolish to rely solely on a question bank for study. Reading, highlighting, making notes, and understanding the principles is 75% of the game. Especially with the new question formats. The other 25% is learning the how to answer, and get around certain types of questions. This extra help is what pushes your score above 75% and gets you the pass. This is what question banks come in handy for. Literally memorising thousands of questions may have got people through in the past, but it's just not enough now. Even prior to the new question formats, I saw students do nothing but hammer the Bristol QB for a week before exams. And fail four or five exams.
Put in the work by using the books and material, then brush-up and test your knowledge through the question banks. It will take A LOT of time and effort, but that's the nature of the ground school beast I'm afraid.
When I was there the instructors toed the party line and told us to stay away from question banks, as they claimed learning the content through the books was the most effective way to get through the exams. This was very bad advice. In both the school exams and EASAs, the ones who didn't use question banks (or spent very little time using one) ALWAYS had the lowest scores. Question banks are a weapon in your arsenal, so use them IN ADDITION TO proper study.
What I will say is that it would be very, very foolish to rely solely on a question bank for study. Reading, highlighting, making notes, and understanding the principles is 75% of the game. Especially with the new question formats. The other 25% is learning the how to answer, and get around certain types of questions. This extra help is what pushes your score above 75% and gets you the pass. This is what question banks come in handy for. Literally memorising thousands of questions may have got people through in the past, but it's just not enough now. Even prior to the new question formats, I saw students do nothing but hammer the Bristol QB for a week before exams. And fail four or five exams.
Put in the work by using the books and material, then brush-up and test your knowledge through the question banks. It will take A LOT of time and effort, but that's the nature of the ground school beast I'm afraid.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Oahu
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i agree with rotweiler 100% it should be used as an aid when a person feels comfortable they understand the topic and then use bristol to attempt the questions to get a feel of how the exams are worded/styled etc..
but this is where i wanted to ask fellow members the following that i have encountered, the first being not everyone i have met that are studying or have studied the atpls are forward to say that they have used or are using bristol question bank, some look at disgust when the word bristol is mentioned, or dont even suggest it to use at all.
we have been told by the school where im studying to use bristol a week before our easa exams which in realistically time wise is impossible to cover 7 subjects in 7 days i.e 1 subject on average has over 1200 questions, doing 1000 question per day works out to be roughly 200/300 question per hour depending on the individuals usage ..
the second being when browsing the relevant sites in terms of atpl exam feedback the majority people have commented that doing the last 200/300 questions of each subject is the most up to date questions that are being asked in the exams , again how true is this? as that each exam sat by individuals are generated differently thus the chance of myself seeing those 200 questions in my real exams can vary i may get 60% of those questions from the bank or i may get all new ones ... but again a lot of feedback has been said the last 200/300 questions are the ones to remember etc
also i have met students at my school who have said , all they have done is 3 months prior to their exams is hammer the bank and the questions they have done in the bank came up in their exams and they have passed with 75 % and above
thirdly does sitting the exams at different venue have a similar pattern of the questions that are repeated or asked in the exams i.e sititng at gatwick 40% bank questions compared to sitting at oxford having 10% bank questions..
to conclude i do understand the bank is to be used as an aid to compliment the individuals studies..
anyone care to share there views..?
but this is where i wanted to ask fellow members the following that i have encountered, the first being not everyone i have met that are studying or have studied the atpls are forward to say that they have used or are using bristol question bank, some look at disgust when the word bristol is mentioned, or dont even suggest it to use at all.
we have been told by the school where im studying to use bristol a week before our easa exams which in realistically time wise is impossible to cover 7 subjects in 7 days i.e 1 subject on average has over 1200 questions, doing 1000 question per day works out to be roughly 200/300 question per hour depending on the individuals usage ..
the second being when browsing the relevant sites in terms of atpl exam feedback the majority people have commented that doing the last 200/300 questions of each subject is the most up to date questions that are being asked in the exams , again how true is this? as that each exam sat by individuals are generated differently thus the chance of myself seeing those 200 questions in my real exams can vary i may get 60% of those questions from the bank or i may get all new ones ... but again a lot of feedback has been said the last 200/300 questions are the ones to remember etc
also i have met students at my school who have said , all they have done is 3 months prior to their exams is hammer the bank and the questions they have done in the bank came up in their exams and they have passed with 75 % and above
thirdly does sitting the exams at different venue have a similar pattern of the questions that are repeated or asked in the exams i.e sititng at gatwick 40% bank questions compared to sitting at oxford having 10% bank questions..
to conclude i do understand the bank is to be used as an aid to compliment the individuals studies..
anyone care to share there views..?
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,804
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes. There's no reason why training material cannot be written to both teach the subject and to answer the exam questions. The only issue is the time lag between new and unexpected questions turning up and getting material updated which, even in a near perfect world, would be six months. That gap is covered in full time courses by the instructors (or should be), in distance learning courses by the revision courses (or should be) and in advance preparation for the revision courses by question banks. I really struggle with instructors at big integrated schools sneering at question banks, their students are subscribing (at extra expense) to get a service which, frankly, they should be providing.
My view is that you should be exposed to exam questions from early on in your training. We test our distance learning customers at three levels. Each CBT lesson is followed by a quiz of 5 to 10 questions, the purpose is to check understanding. The quiz questions require 100% pass as they are regarded as 'required knowledge', they may be CQB questions, they may be generated by us. Every group of lessons (a topic, if you like) is followed by a progress test, longer, almost always CQB questions, and with a lower 75% pass mark. This allows an early sight of exam questions and consolidates knowledge. Results from both allow us to track student progress. Finally students beat the question bank to death before the revision weeks so they have seen everything about the exam we can show them before the classroom session and are able to ask questions arising both from their study and from the CQB questions they have seen.
Using question banks on their own is foolish, in its simplest terms it means you can't understand the explanations you are given, you are reduced to learning answers. This will result in a big fat fail unless you are incredibly lucky/have a photographic memory.
My view is that you should be exposed to exam questions from early on in your training. We test our distance learning customers at three levels. Each CBT lesson is followed by a quiz of 5 to 10 questions, the purpose is to check understanding. The quiz questions require 100% pass as they are regarded as 'required knowledge', they may be CQB questions, they may be generated by us. Every group of lessons (a topic, if you like) is followed by a progress test, longer, almost always CQB questions, and with a lower 75% pass mark. This allows an early sight of exam questions and consolidates knowledge. Results from both allow us to track student progress. Finally students beat the question bank to death before the revision weeks so they have seen everything about the exam we can show them before the classroom session and are able to ask questions arising both from their study and from the CQB questions they have seen.
Using question banks on their own is foolish, in its simplest terms it means you can't understand the explanations you are given, you are reduced to learning answers. This will result in a big fat fail unless you are incredibly lucky/have a photographic memory.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Oahu
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hi alex, thanks for replying but i wanted an answer to the following:
the second being when browsing the relevant sites in terms of atpl exam feedback the majority people have commented that doing the last 200/300 questions of each subject is the most up to date questions that are being asked in the exams , again how true is this? as that each exam sat by individuals are generated differently thus the chance of myself seeing those 200 questions in my real exams can vary i may get 60% of those questions from the bank or i may get all new ones ... but again a lot of feedback has been said the last 200/300 questions are the ones to remember etc
also i have met students at my school who have said , all they have done is 3 months prior to their exams is hammer the bank and the questions they have done in the bank came up in their exams and they have passed with 75 % and above
thirdly does sitting the exams at different venue have a similar pattern of the questions that are repeated or asked in the exams i.e sititng at gatwick 40% bank questions compared to sitting at oxford having 10% bank questions..
the second being when browsing the relevant sites in terms of atpl exam feedback the majority people have commented that doing the last 200/300 questions of each subject is the most up to date questions that are being asked in the exams , again how true is this? as that each exam sat by individuals are generated differently thus the chance of myself seeing those 200 questions in my real exams can vary i may get 60% of those questions from the bank or i may get all new ones ... but again a lot of feedback has been said the last 200/300 questions are the ones to remember etc
also i have met students at my school who have said , all they have done is 3 months prior to their exams is hammer the bank and the questions they have done in the bank came up in their exams and they have passed with 75 % and above
thirdly does sitting the exams at different venue have a similar pattern of the questions that are repeated or asked in the exams i.e sititng at gatwick 40% bank questions compared to sitting at oxford having 10% bank questions..
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,804
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. All national Authorities are required to generate their exams from the EASA CQB. Some do it by running an algorithm across the entire CQB for that subject getting x questions to meet that LO, y questions to meet another, etc. If they do that the result will be that nearly every student gets a different exam, as the pool of available questions is large. Others take a sample of questions per subject from the CQB, presumably run a validation exercise at national level (so they are not embarrassed by really bad questions) then select their questions from this smaller local database for a period. if they do that the all students will get similar exams in each subject for a period, and the same questions will keep coming up. I think the UK CAA do the latter, hence the last 160/200/300 comments you quote.
2. Only works if they have learned the base material. Three months sounds like overkill, 4 weeks per module should kill it, particularly if they have been exposed to exam questions in the learning phase.
3. In the UK - no difference. If you go outside the Uk see point 1 above.
2. Only works if they have learned the base material. Three months sounds like overkill, 4 weeks per module should kill it, particularly if they have been exposed to exam questions in the learning phase.
3. In the UK - no difference. If you go outside the Uk see point 1 above.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Oahu
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alex you can learn the base material but then attempting the bank you can see how ambiguous some of the answers are to the questions in such subjects such as human performance, in relations to the last 200/300 comment i mentioned its funny that not everyone shares the same view of that scenario when i asked them how was the exams.
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: egll
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread has run it's course surely, with all the time spent posting here and talking to so many people and adding up your chances you could have spent those hours studying, it's getting a bit ridiculous now! We've all done it and some of us still are, you've been given some sound advice here already, there really is not much more people can add.