Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

Diamond DA20 vs. Cessna 172 for flight training

Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Diamond DA20 vs. Cessna 172 for flight training

Old 2nd May 2012, 03:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: United States
Age: 31
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Diamond DA20 vs. Cessna 172 for flight training

Hey guys! So, I have two flight schools to choose from. One's in Canada and the other's in the U.S. One of the schools uses DA20 while the other uses Cessna 172s, so I was wondering which one is better for flight training(?). One thing to note, the 172s are equipped with G1000 glass cockpit and are part of a Cessna Pilot Center. I want to pursue a career as an airline pilot. Thanks!
Green58 is offline  
Old 2nd May 2012, 07:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a huge amount of difference in handling, not that you'll notice that early on in training anyway.

Sit in both, which feels more comfortable? One's stick, other's yoke, which feels more natural to you?

High wing makes for easier VFR navigation, but you do lose visibility when turning.

The glass cockpit is more suited to airliner cockpits, but they are intuitive to pick up later on anyway, so you might like to get some experience of steam dials and learn what each thing actually does and how it does it in practice, as opposed to the smoke and mirrors of glass cockpits...

Far more important that the aircraft you'll be flying is which school you feel better at - much better to learn in a spamcan with an instructor you feel comfortable with than a shiny piece of sex with some guy who doesn't understand you and you don't understand either!
4015 is offline  
Old 2nd May 2012, 09:00
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: United States
Age: 31
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4015, Thanks for your help.

I've neither tried the yoke nor stick, so I don't know which one feel more natural
Also, as an international student, it's harder for me to visit the schools and meet the instructors like you've said.

Between Canada and the U.S., which country is better for flight training? The Canadian College I'm referring to is Moncton Flight College.

Thanks in advance!
Green58 is offline  
Old 2nd May 2012, 09:39
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,202
Received 46 Likes on 24 Posts
I'd go with the C172 - it's probably slightly cheaper, a yoke is representative of the majority of theairliners you want to fly, and you'll find familiarity with a C172 more useful than with a DA40 if, as is highly likely, you end up a flying instructor for a few years hourbuilding.

But it's a minor point, they're both perfectly good training aeroplanes.

As for USA versus Canada - the USA is better recognised worldwide in terms of its licences, but having flown in both environments, I'd say that there's nothing to choose between the two in terms of quality of learning environment. The USA may well offer a better flying rate as somewhere like California will offer more consistently good flying weather than anywhere in Canada.

Realistically if they are both apparently good schools, go with the cheapest. If they're the same, go with the one with better weather.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 2nd May 2012, 14:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK, US, now more ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Age: 41
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt you'd find Canadian rates for airplanes any cheaper than good value US based school. CDN is way too strong compared to USD.
MartinCh is offline  
Old 2nd May 2012, 18:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MyanmarPilot

You're asking the wrong question. It really doesn't matter what aircraft you learn to fly on. What really matters is the quality of the instruction and the professionalism of the school.
Graham@IDC is offline  
Old 2nd May 2012, 19:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: In a suitcase.
Age: 41
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I agree with Graham@IDC and I did my flight training at MFC and was very impressed with the quality of instructing. This school has many years of experience with training and they train many pilots every year.

Only bad thing to say about the school is that it was sometimes difficult to get a plane, due to the chinese program taking priority.

The DA20 was awesome to fly. The C172 seemed slow and heavy compared to it. The high wing/low wing is not really an issue for navigation, as the wings are not wide and you have the best view from that plane due to the big canopy.
Moncton is a busy airport without getting overcroweded. They have good training areas all around the airport.
You get to experience flying during winter time with deicing/anti icing and possibly taxing on snow/ice. It is cold as , but damn good experience.

As for USA versus Canada - the USA is better recognised worldwide in terms of its licences, but having flown in both environments, I'd say that there's nothing to choose between the two in terms of quality of learning environment.
I doubt that the FAA guy would be prefered if two identical pilots came and one had FAA and the other a Canadian ICAO license, unless you were in Saudi Arabia or South America, where you will not get any job anyway, unless you are local or very experienced.
IMHO the Canadian training is closer to the EASA than FAA.

Good luck with your project.
SAS-A321 is offline  
Old 3rd May 2012, 14:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Here and there..........
Age: 35
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The DA has a higher aspect ratio than the Cessna hence it is more sensitive to gusts and turbulence. The low wing makes the DA float for a very long time over the runway in summers. Prop and tail clearance is lower in he DA. Hence it is more prone to prop or prop strikes.
On the plus side, I find the DA's cockpit more comfortable than the Cessna.
(P.S. I am using the DA 40 for comparison)

But this is just for your information, And as someone above said, You should be looking more at the quality of flight school than the aircraft.


Cheers and all the best
starpanther is offline  
Old 11th May 2012, 20:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: United Arab Emirates
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi there,
Based on my experience, I would recomend the C172.To me it is the best A/C for training (Safety,handling and the yoke). In C172 I have felt a real aviate,while in the DA,I felt like flying a simulator..
Anyways, try to get more information about the two schools as a matter of quality and relaibility,,,oh do not forget the wx issue (you may spend many days waiting for a good wx just to have one flying hour)...
Good luck
Namso is offline  
Old 15th May 2012, 13:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,182
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
The DA20 is more fun to fly, the C172 is just plain boring.
The Diamond series of aircraft have much more responsive flight controls thanks to the design of using push rods rather then cable and pully systems like the Pa28 or C172.
This means you move the stick and the airplane moves rather then droning along in the aeronautical equivalent of a wet paper bag.
I believe aircraft with push rod flight controls make more accurate pilots....
B2N2 is offline  
Old 15th May 2012, 21:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever is cheapest.
student88 is offline  
Old 16th May 2012, 14:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,182
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Whatever is cheapest.

That's utterly useless advise.
If anything, as stated earlier, the school is more important then the airplane.
There is no such thing as "cheap" in aviation, if you choose cheap to start off with you'll pay double further down the line to make up for your deficits.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 16th May 2012, 15:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mare Nostrum
Age: 41
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have flown both the C172 and the DA-20, as well as Pipers and Beechcraft. This is what I can tell you from my experiences:

B2N2 is completely right, cheapest isn't always the best. You get what you pay for. Sure, everyone wants to get a good deal. Sometimes people over pay in the end when they thought they were going to get a good deal. The school you choose is very important.

Regarding C172 vs DA-20, I like both but for different reasons.
C172 has more room so you can bring a big bag. Also, you can recover pretty easily from some mistakes such as being too high because it drops like a rock. On hot days, I like being able to open the window and stick my elbow out like a car. On a hot day, you can open the door during taxi to improve airflow.

The DA-20 glides really well, so you have to be more precise on energy management. It is also quite aerodynamic, so a forward slip to landing isn't as effective as on a C172. You really have to manage the energy and descents. I like the view because it has a nice canopy. When it is hot out, you have a tiny window, and you can't really open the canopy to taxi. I like flying the stick

Overall, I wouldn't pick a school based on the airplane, but rather the qualify of instruction, maintenance, etc...
zondaracer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.