Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Poor quality of Oxford's ATPL notes...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2004, 03:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland.
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Poor quality of Oxford's ATPL notes...

Currently studying Phase 1 of ATPL notes distance learning from Oxford Aviation Training.

I just opened the Mass and Balance folder to be met with 4 pages of amendments to be made to the notes.
I went to amend them, but they are already amended!! Why have the errata there in the first place?

Iam 75% through phase 1 and I am dissapointed by the poor quality of the notes. They are riddled with spelling mistakes, poor punctuation/grammar and some of the questions contain wrong answers etc, etc.

Having paid £1100 for phase 1 and similar for phase 2, I expect the notes at least to have been proof read for spelling mistakes!!

When we buy a 30 pence newspaper every day, we expect the spelling and punctuation to be correct and so I think the same should be said for spending over a £1000 on a document.


Come on Oxford, surely you can do better than this??
muppethead is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2004, 09:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Is this the face of concern?

(with apologies to a certain instruments lecturer who teaches on the south coast...)

I can appreciate your frustration- there's nothing worse (OK, barring repeated pokings in the eye with a sharp stick) that doing a professional qualification and being faced with non-professional English or unprofessional use of grammar. I get particularly frustrated with it (as anyone who knows me will testify!).

As I've said in another thread, I've seen lots of schools notes, and with some subjects some schools notes are vastly better than others (I chose my [full time] school based on the quality of their notes). I suppose the trouble with M&B is that it's very much a practical subject, and there's no substitute for good practice at the sorts of questions you might be faced with.

My advice: get yourself some good feedback, practice the questions, and if needs be supplement it with a revision book from another school or a pilot shop.
WX Man is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2004, 15:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hello,

i totally agree with WXMan! The OAT Notes are just unacceptable. Not even spelling mistakes and wrong grammar but also poor schematic description!

This makes Distant Learning quiet hard

regards subsy
subsidence is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2004, 15:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I use the Bristol Groudschool stuff, and despite what some people tried to tell me before I bought the course I think they're great!

Also, version 3 of the Brostol software is a great tool.

Regards,
Gordon.
gordonsmall is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2004, 19:58
  #5 (permalink)  

Jet Blast Rat
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarfend-on-Sea
Age: 51
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having seen many sets of notes, I don't think of Oxfords as bad. I could mention 2 sets of notes that are significantly worse. As the author of some notes, it would suggest bias if I said which, but do check the notes before you choose a course!
Send Clowns is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2004, 10:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which Groundschool?

Hey WX Man

What school did you use in the end for ATPL Groundschool and just how good were the notes?
thanks
redout is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2004, 11:33
  #7 (permalink)  
GJB
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
would have to ask why you are moaning about it here and not venting your spleen to Oxford.
GJB is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2004, 22:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
So why is there not a standard set of notes for the JAA ATPL, based on a standard set of references? Isn't that what it is all about?
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2004, 22:41
  #9 (permalink)  

Jet Blast Rat
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarfend-on-Sea
Age: 51
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In most cases they won't tell us (the schools) what the references are. Kind of makes it hard for HP&L, where the answer frequently depends only on who you listen to!
Send Clowns is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2004, 10:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the Oxford notes were very good indeed - combined with the brush up courses, it was a good experience for me.

I would agree that there were a few issues with the Mass and Balance notes as I had a load of amendments in mine too (they were issued in 2001 so I am surprised they still haven't updated them) but in general the standard was good.

Hufty
Hufty is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2004, 10:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought they were pretty good as well.

If you want to see crap notes have a look at a set of 4forces or Glasgow Nautical college notes.

4forces were just plain ****e.

And the Nautical college ones are written by Engineers for Engineers from what I could see.

The Bristol notes seem very well presented as well. My m8 is currently working his way through them uses them in conjunction with my old OAT notes to get the best of both worlds.

MJ
mad_jock is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2004, 21:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oxford Notes

Interesting subject!

Firstly, I am the subject expert in Met at Oxford. Many of you know me, being ex SECOAT, PPSC with courses at Bristol, Pilot Assist, etc.

The original notes were based on the learning objectives.

Don't expect perfect 'newspaper' copy in school notes, the guys writing the notes are just normal guys. Unless someone puts their input through a copy editor at great expense then it will be as the instructor wrote it.

My book in the 'Ground training for Pilots' series was fully edited and it took on a huge difference following the work of the copy editor. Even then there were errors!

Funny old thing, even with the Oxford notes, our student pass the course. Even get jobs! 20+ Oxford students have just started work, this month, 757, 737, etc.

The guys and girls who got the jobs were more involved in the study for their ATPL's than bothering with Pprune in spending time moaning. e-mail time would be better spent as study time.


Why is it that this forum attracts more moans than positive comments? Well look at the results, more people pass without comment!



John Standen

Subject Expert - Meteorology
Oxford Aviation Training.
Metsys is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2004, 17:18
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: oxford
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me add the following to John's comments:

If Muppethead would like to make a list of comments and criticism highlighting where he thinks the notes need correcting and send it to:

The Chief Ground Instructor
Oxford Aviation Training
Oxford Airport
Kidlington
Oxon ox5 1ra

he will receive a courteous reply and a short note of thanks from us. If his comments are valid, they will be incorporated into the amendment after next. (The next amendment, which may well have already picked some of his points, has already gone to press).

Oxford appreciates constructive comment and always tries to improve following it, if we think it valid. But a generalised whinge on pprune helps no-one!
oxford blue is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2004, 21:52
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Muppethead, do you really believe your daily newspaper to be free of spelling and grammar errors? Your standards in those areas can't be very demanding then....

Newspapers and magazines, notwithstanding my little dig, can afford to have high production standards because of their relatively huge income from both advertising and circulation, and the fact that their staff are employed full time solely to produce that publication. That is not the case with the study notes of any educational institution, with perhaps the sole exception of the Open University.

Amendments to manuals are something you're just going to have to get used to in aviation. You'll be doing them, or at least receiving new CD-ROMs, every few months for the rest of your flying career. Corrections of past errors of English with further errors of English are par for the course. You're lucky - at least your manuals are produced by English speakers. Try dealing with Airbus manuals! And, while we're at it, my manuals for the A340 cost my company a great deal more than what you paid for yours from Oxford.

As Oxford Blue says, if you find genuine errors, report them to the staff. If you're just having a general moan because you had a bad day, let's hope you're not identifiable!

Scroggs
scroggs is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2004, 19:02
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North West, UK
Age: 56
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check this out guy's

http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...&threadid=4993
EGCC4284 is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2004, 08:33
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 14,998
Received 169 Likes on 65 Posts
You youngsters today don't know you're born!

Way back in the last century (1998) I was struggling through the mighty blue books of PPSC. They were regarded as pretty good at the time but my how you'd be shocked to compare them to the offerings available today.

Cheers

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2004, 12:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: North
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair comment about the notes, but I would be interested to hear whether you found the OAT feedback useful. My experience was that it was excellent. This always used to be included in the price of the course, unless that has changed now?
zcar is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2004, 14:50
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Age: 44
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
guys,

you know what, if you can understand the notes, and you can pass the exams with them, then i think you have nothing to complain about...in my opinion, i used the oxford stuff for my Principles of Flight exam.....and i got 90%...enough said...

keeno
keeno is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2004, 14:47
  #19 (permalink)  
Master Baiter
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ermm, spelling mistakes were the least of my worries while doing my ATPL's ... however, Oxford notes got me through .. and their brush up courses good. I reckon theirs and Bristol's are about the best going!

Anyway, I liked doing the amendments cos it meant I didn't have to study
Nearly Man is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2004, 14:28
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EGCC4282

That seems like a pretty decent attempt at pulling up a 3 and a half year old thread which is simply a Bristol GS advertising campaign

Having said that - that's where I went and had no complaints at all
Ropey Pilot is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.