![]() |
longest c152 flight?
Hi All,
New one... Just for fun, whos been where as pic in a c152 (obviously long distance) :) |
Well after about 1 hour my butt tends to get sore in a C 152 so I try hard to keep the flights short. However when I was a young instructor one of my students wanted to build night time hours. He flew a solo triangle round robin route with a total nonstop flight time of 7.4 hours :ouch:
|
ouch sore butt
My skills test seemed ok but i did get out an have a coffee twice! :rolleyes:
|
I tend to stick to under 3 hours before my back cries enough... Usually IF with trips that length though, so a lot of time spent in the cruise. Most people can't get a C152 near its real endurance anyway, without understanding of quoted POH performance and leaning technique!
|
Not me and not a 152 (its a 150 instead) ...BUT
have a look at G-AWAW RESTORATION.
I helped pack up whats left of AWAW at Wroughton Science Museum to send her off to the USA and met Janette. A wonderful lady and UK to Darwin single handed has got to be the longest trip that we will find (unless you know better) |
C 150:
Central Ontario to: Bahamas, return, Mexican border at Texas, return, and, Edmonton, return |
I take my hat off to you guys. I have to lean to the right in a 152 as there's not enough room for my shoulders when the door is closed. Two up, well you get to be real friendly with the passenger.........
|
I went to places like Morocco, Prague, Poland etc in mine.
|
He flew a solo triangle round robin route with a total nonstop flight time of 7.4 hours I'm very surprised that the C152 can have an endurance of 7.4 hours (I presume long-range tanks?) but even more so that an instructor would sign a student out to actually do these kinds of flights. At night even. |
7 hrs 20 mins on a photographic/survey sortie quite a few years ago. Need a plane with a toilet nowadays!
|
Every flight in a 152 seemed to last forever.....
|
Every flight in a 152 seemed to last forever..... |
Originally Posted by BackPacker
(Post 6831929)
Where I learned to fly we were specifically forbidden (through the flying order book) to plan non-stop/unrefueled flights longer than 2.5 hours. For the PA28 and C172 exceptions were occasionally made (after a careful check of the plog/fuel plan), but not for the C152.
I'm very surprised that the C152 can have an endurance of 7.4 hours (I presume long-range tanks?) but even more so that an instructor would sign a student out to actually do these kinds of flights. At night even. The student was building time for his CPL. The C 152 POH shows it has ,with long range tanks, over 8 hours endurance at 45 % power with a 45 min reserve. In this case he landed with a solid hour of fuel at normal cruise still in the tanks. As for signing out the student it was a CAVU night and he did several laps of the triangle (about 150 nm total distance) before landing so he was never far away from his home airport or several other available airports. Personally I though he was crazy, but I guess when you are 20 years old 7.4 hrs in C152 sounds like an adventure. :hmm: I find your note about restricting all flights to 2.5 hours sad. You are basically saying flight planning doesn't mean anything, Just fill it up use any power setting you want, don't bother leaning out, and our super safe rule means you can never run out of gas. So just when is the pilot supposed to learn about fuel planning? When he is flying his own airplane with passengers ? on his first day as a commercial pilot ? |
|
wow!
What more can i say? Thats epic! (and crazy!)
|
I find your note about restricting all flights to 2.5 hours sad. You are basically saying flight planning doesn't mean anything, Just fill it up use any power setting you want, don't bother leaning out, and our super safe rule means you can never run out of gas. So just when is the pilot supposed to learn about fuel planning? When he is flying his own airplane with passengers ? on his first day as a commercial pilot ? And hey, 2.5 hours is enough for the PPL QXC. |
The more general comment is that most people flying these things haven't got much of a clue as to the real range they have.
For starters, almost nobody in the UK is taught correct leaning, but there is a ~30% difference between full-rich, and ~ peak EGT which is a perfectly authorised cruise setting at/below 75% of max rated power. The slackness with which fuel planning was done during my PPL training (basically, looking at the tech log to see how long the previous person flew) horrified me from the start. Whenever I went solo, I always filled right up. Sometimes I got a bollocking from the "CFI" for putting in only 20 litres, but it was better than doing a G-OMAR (google is your friend, as always) which happened rather less than a million miles away from where I was flying :) If I owned a C152 I would install a fuel totaliser, immediately. |
learn to lean?
Longest flight in a C152 - my skills test, so around 2 hours.
The more general comment is that most people flying these things haven't got much of a clue as to the real range they have. For starters, almost nobody in the UK is taught correct leaning, but there is a ~30% difference between full-rich, and ~ peak EGT which is a perfectly authorised cruise setting at/below 75% of max rated power. I have never leaned an engine, never had training how to do it, and as I rent 'wet' there is actually no financial incentive for me to fly economically. Am I doing any engine damage by not leaning? All my fuel calculations in a C152 are based on 6 gallons an hour. Sounds like I could do with some leaning instruction. |
there is actually no financial incentive for me to fly economically. Am I doing any engine damage by not leaning? Sounds like I could do with some leaning instruction. Without instrumentation, the method for correct-ish leaning is to set it all up in cruise, 75% of max rated power or less, and then slowly lean until there is a fairly sudden drop in power (or airspeed if you like). Then advance (enrich) the mixture back just a little, to the point before the sudden power drop. Your engine might run a bit rough when the power drops off and that is normal; the same principle applies... enrich till the roughness disappears. |
Sounds like I could do with some leaning instruction. But for a simple aircraft like a C152 (or basically any non-turbo carbureted Lycosaurus without sophisticated instrumentation) everything you need to know will probably come down to this: - At any power settings above 75%, run full rich. But remember the engine cannot produce more than 75% power above 5000' DA. - For best power mixture (e.g. full power climb above 5000' DA, or take-off from a high-altitude field), lean for best RPM. - In the cruise, lean until the engine runs rough and enrich slightly to restore smooth running. - Set full rich before any power change, lean afterwards. Do not attempt to make power changes with a leaned engine. In the circuit, where you will have a number of power changes, it's easiest to simply run full rich all the time. Once the engine and instruments gets more sophisticated (constant speed prop, injectors, matched injectors, CGT, EGT, per-cylinder CGT/EGT, fuel flow meter, ...) leaning becomes progressively more sophisticated too. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 21:25. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.