PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   Flymap F7/F5 (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/414706-flymap-f7-f5.html)

The Dead Side 9th May 2010 20:22

Flymap F7/F5
 
Hi All,

I've searched everywhere on PPRuNe for info, but with no luck.

I'm looking to purchase a GPS, preferably with CAA VFR maps, and after a bit of reasearch I've narrowed it down to either the Airbox Foresight, or Flymap's F7.

Has anyone had any experience of the flymap at all? It seems the better out of the two, but I can't find any information about it, apart from a promising review;

http://www.pioneeravionics.co.uk/dow...Double_tap.pdf

Cheers

lordhedges 10th May 2010 12:33

there is a large GPS buyer's guide in the June issue of Pilot magazine that might help - the Foresight and F7 feature amongst the reviews.

flybymike 10th May 2010 23:54

A search on the Flyer GA Discussion forum for "Flymap" will present some results; not all of them complimentary

The Dead Side 11th May 2010 23:11

Cheers folks. Spoken to Brad at pioneer avionics, very helpful indeed.

The Dead Side 15th May 2010 12:51

Out of the Airbox and flymap, I decided to try out the Flymap F7.

It came yesterday, I'll post a reply as soon as I've used it in the air, but on first apperances it seems like an extremely slick bit of kit, which responds well.

fuzzflyer 2nd May 2011 18:20

AvMAP EKP-IV GPS

Sussex Flyer 4th July 2011 11:21

North up or Track up
 
Let me know how the CAA chart looks in track up mode, on the Airbox Forsight the resolution in track-up is terrible

SF

IO540 4th July 2011 12:30

I can't see a raster chart (like the UK CAA VFR ones) being usable in track up mode. What if you are flying a track of 180? Everything will be upside down. You will need a very flexible neck :)

stevelup 4th July 2011 15:59


Originally Posted by Sussex Flyer (Post 6551690)
Let me know how the CAA chart looks in track up mode, on the Airbox Forsight the resolution in track-up is terrible

it will be terrible. It's a technical impossibility for it to be anything other than terrible.

I have no idea why those raster map based devices have anything other than a north up mode on them.

SDB73 4th July 2011 16:03

Why is it a technical impossibility?

IO540 4th July 2011 16:12

Because, if a map is to be rotated meaningfully, the text needs to be on a separate layer, so the text remains upright as the underlying map is rotated.

Moreover, the text needs to be not just one layer but each piece of it (e.g. each airspace label) needs to be "attached" to a particular piece of airspace so that as the map is rotated the label can be redrawn in the right place.

And the CAA does not publish its VFR charts in a layered form. They let them out only as a single-layer flat graphic, and that is how Memory Map resells them.

Companies which produce rotatable aviation maps are Jeppesen (whose maps are used on most GPSs), PocketFMS, and I think 1 or 2 others. But I don't think any of the national-CAA-produced VFR charts are available in a layered form suitable for rotation.

There is a separate issue with rotating a graphic in that there is an inevitable loss of resolution - unless the rotation is 90/180/270 degrees in which case you can do it precisely. But I don't think that is the major issue here.

SDB73 4th July 2011 16:18

Ah I see. The question you quoted was about resolution, rather than things being upside down.

The resolution issue is solvable simply with a higher resolution image and some half decent anti-aliasing.

Agreed though, you can't turn the text round!


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:59.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.