PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   MoD Tucano Sell Off (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/265682-mod-tucano-sell-off.html)

RAFAT 26th February 2007 18:12

Genghis - thanks very much for that useful link, I had no idea that they were also selling non-airworthy examples, I do now though! :ok:

360BakTrak 26th February 2007 19:32

They charge for a reg? But you just said they don't unless you want to fly??!!:confused:

Feck 26th February 2007 20:09

Back to the thread...

Having flown a Tucano today for the first time in a few years, I think you'd be mad to buy one. Fun, granted, but for fast A to B you'd be better off in something a little more comfortable. That would be pretty much anything. For general looning around in, buy a Yak / Extra / Sukhoi and you'd have plenty of money left over to run it.

But it's your money!

IO540 26th February 2007 20:45

I know nothing about these, but aren't there quite a few other turboprops of similar performance (e.g. Pilatus) and with a more modern engine?

RAFAT 27th February 2007 00:30

!!!! - is that so? why? the article in Flyer magazine spoke quite highly of the Tuc. Of course the reporter may not have the comparative experience that you have.

greeners 27th February 2007 07:00

I believe that the reporter (who has flown or owned all of the types mentioned above) specifically stated that he was unlikely to be able to afford to run one on his fleet.

Feck 27th February 2007 21:20

RAFAT,

What's it for? A to B at 240 kt can be achieved in other turboprops without the hassle of protective clothing / uncomfortable bang-seats. The oil system places restrictive time limits on less-than-1g flight, which coupled with monstrous torque and heavy controls means aeros are less fun than in a dedicated steed. I guess people will want them for the best of both worlds...to be able to go places and aerobat if the mood takes. I confess I have no idea what they'll be selling for (and hence how desirable compared with other ac), but maintenance is not likely to be cheap. Furthermore they're not as solid as most other military ac, need tarmac and turboprops are noisy.

If it was my money I'd look elsewhere, but I appreciate the novelty / prestige factor may be alluring.

RAFAT 28th February 2007 01:30

Thanks for the advice. I've done enough aeros to last me more than a few lifetimes so it wouldn't be for that, simply the appeal of a reasonably respectable touring distance, 240 kts, FL250, and a bit of novelty value thrown in as you point out.

Genghis the Engineer 28th February 2007 08:06

Don't forget, the type has no civil CofA, so you'd have to go through a lot of work to get it into a PtF, then still be restricted to day VMC, and need permission to fly it outside of the UK.

I believe it's possible to get a Pilatus PC7 Mk.1 with an EASA CofA, that would not have those restrictions, and probably be a better aircraft anyway. (Having done quite a lot of flight testing on the Tucano early in it's RAF career, I'd agree with most of !!!!'s criticisms, and could add a few dozen of my own).

But, I still hope that I can buy one, it'll make a great engineering teaching airframe!

G

Gingerbread Man 28th February 2007 16:30

PC7 for sale here. I want that!!! Ejection seats, HUD, anti-g system, etc. One hell of a toy for a 'I-couldn't-join-the-RAF' type like myself. Are you allowed furniture removal on a civvy aircraft?

I shudder to think what the asking price is though :(

Ginger ;)

flyingfemme 28th February 2007 17:55


I shudder to think what the asking price is though
Available in the US for between $1M and $2M, depending on spec, times etc.

Nice to travel in - good range with drop tanks and generous luggage space.

IO540 28th February 2007 18:24

Is the Pilatus pressurised?

Looks nice.

Gingerbread Man 28th February 2007 19:47


between $1M and $2M, depending on spec
That doesn't sound too unreasonable, in a relative sense. It's not like i'm going to go out and buy one now, but if I stumbled across an oil field, who knows?

(I'd probably become a victim of 'regime change' I suppose :} )

Ginger ;)

RAFAT 28th February 2007 22:51

Genghis - did they ever mod the capton wiring? that stuff was an absolute nightmare for the Engineers.

flyingfemme 1st March 2007 07:28

PC7s are not pressurised - you get to wear a bone dome and oxygen mask. Very Top Gun :cool:

englishal 1st March 2007 08:02


Available in the US for between $1M and $2M, depending on spec
I'd get a D-Jet in that case ;)

IO540 1st March 2007 10:01

I wonder what the oxygen system endurance is at FL250?

Most non-P piston planes have an o2 endurance (assuming say 3 people, FL250) substantially shorter than their fuel endurance. The sales brochure doesn't tell you this of course, yet they do base their speed figures on the FL250 TAS ;)

Genghis the Engineer 1st March 2007 11:12


Genghis - did they ever mod the capton wiring? that stuff was an absolute nightmare for the Engineers.
Was the Tucano Capton wired? I can't recall ever hearing mention of it.


Incidentally the Tucano is also unpressurised with a helmet/mask system. My very vague memory thinks that on 100% O2 you had about 2 hours, but I could be miles out.

G

RAFAT 1st March 2007 15:49

Yes it was Genghis. Additionally, a lot of the wiring looms were apparently fitted before the skin was, so cable replacement was at times impossible without returning the airframe to the Acceptance hangar at Scampton and removing the skin from the relevant areas! Some cables needed to be replaced as soon as the airframe arrived from Shorts as they were tie-wrapped too tightly causing a breakdown in the integrity of the cable. This was commonplace when it came to the co-axial cables feeding various avionics equipment.

I would assume that the Engineers ironed out these problems over time though so my level of interest remains high.

Genghis the Engineer 1st March 2007 17:29

My involvement with the Tucano was primarily on handling qualities assessments, so I'm unsurprised I didn't know. But, a little surprising - not an aeroplane I'd have expected a major weight issue on, and it's not that plenty of other cost saving measures weren't made elsewhere on the aircraft!

G


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:38.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.