![]() |
If you're coming down short finals at significantly more than that in a light aircraft, you're more likely to over-flare and cause yourself a problem. Also, you haven't allowed for headwind in your approximation of the sink rate required. In a PA28, you would be at 75kts, less a typical headwind of 10kts =65kts, so a 3 degree slope would require 325fpm, from a distance to the threshold of about 1 mile, which is not sensible in a light single, IMHO. The stronger the wind, the worse the numbers. I would approach around -600 fpm, adjusting for wind accordingly, giving me a very comfortable and stable approach. Having got my licence in 1994 and made several hundred (incident free) landings since, I speak from experience, not theory. Having also operated a lot in a CATZ, there simply was not room to make a 3 degree approach, a 1/2 mile final from 300 feet was normal. And it's not only light aircraft that can do this, have you experienced the 146/RJ on the 5.5 degree glideslop to LCY/EGLC? There is another thread about bomber circuits - there is some fit with 3 degree approaches and these. |
Foxmoth says:
raising flap from full will reduce drag, but you will probably need to lower the nose for a slightly higher best glide speed Human Factors wrote: If you're coming down short finals at significantly more than that in a light aircraft, you're more likely to over-flare and cause yourself a problem. |
After a long trip and then side-slipping-in on final due to strong cross-winds, the thought of fuel-starvation caused by unporting of an emptyish tank does cross my mind. :uhoh:
So, I tend to favour a dive-bomb the runway approach. The Arrow gear doors make fantastic airbrakes :yuk:, but because of the gear cycle-time I'd leave the wheels where they are if you're below about 700' |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:53. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.