PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   Here's an interesting article on part 91 v 135 safety (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/639513-heres-interesting-article-part-91-v-135-safety.html)

Pugilistic Animus 27th Mar 2021 07:17

Here's an interesting article on part 91 v 135 safety
 
This will probably attract interest.
https://www.avweb.com/insider/part-9...just-dont-mix/

KeyPilot 1st Apr 2021 10:44


Originally Posted by Pugilistic Animus (Post 11017174)
This will probably attract interest.
https://www.avweb.com/insider/part-9...just-dont-mix/

It is an interesting article, I'm surprised no-one else has commented.

Does anyone know the comparability between Part 91 and EU Part-NCO in terms of requirements? Indeed, do we have a UK Part-NCO now we have left EASA?

The whole idea of NCO/Part91 always confused me - most of these operations are, indeed, commercial. At least the Yankees used a term (91) which didn't describe as "non-commercial" something which is commercial... only the EU managed that!


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:07.


Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.