Lower Airspace Inquiry - Lord Kirkhope
The result of the inquiry into lower airspace design has been published.
Airspace design legislation is unfit for purpose finds APPG Inquiry » All-Party Parliamentary Group on General Aviation It concludes that the current system is "unfit for purpose" and makes a number of recommendations for the future. Here's a link to the full report... http://www.generalaviationappg.uk/wp...hope-Final.pdf |
Let's hope they soon remove all Class A below 10,000 ft... Airways should be in the stratosphere, not in our GA airspace.
|
The USA manages to put all class A above 18,000, and most airways below that in class E.
G |
Originally Posted by scifi
(Post 10514739)
Let's hope they soon remove all Class A below 10,000 ft... Airways should be in the stratosphere, not in our GA airspace.
|
Why would you have class A below 10,000ft? That's just weird, weird, weird. |
S'truth Mate, some of these jokers can't even read a barometer...
. |
Why would you have class A below 10,000ft? |
Originally Posted by On Track
(Post 10517594)
Why would you have class A below 10,000ft? That's just weird, weird, weird. Other than IFR arrivals and departures around airfields min Class A should be 10000 ft plus. They manage 18000 ft in USA with ease. |
Originally Posted by cessnapete
(Post 10518380)
Whatever is the reason for Class A above 2500ft between LHR and LGW?? |
Originally Posted by On Track
(Post 10517594)
Why would you have class A below 10,000ft? That's just weird, weird, weird. |
Chevvron, as far as I can recall it replaced class G. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:45. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.