EASA survey
Might not amount to much after all, but at least an opportunity to express one's concerns wrt Kafkaesque regulations. And I was actually astonished (almost positively surprised) to see that there is apparently a certain awareness of the contrast between purely prescriptive, compliance-based vs. risk-based and goal-oriented safety regulations (lower part of the survey). Maybe enough voices in favour of the second approach can indeed point them in a better direction than the actual "box-ticking bureaucracy" red tape.
Consultations - Transport |
Bump up ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Might fill in an hour on a very wet Sunday afternoon. FL |
I've filled it in but I doubt I've added anything they didn't already know.
|
Bit of a chore but I've done it.
|
I have filled it in as well - but it does seem (to me at least) that EASA are setting their own agenda and looking for (some) answers they want to see
A |
I filled it in on 21 June. Is there another thread with this link? If not, I wonder where I got the link from. (I opted for getting a copy of my response back - the questions seemed familiar, and I checked and found it.)
|
I have filled it in as well - but it does seem (to me at least) that EASA are setting their own agenda and looking for (some) answers they want to see A Whether such free speech can be statistically recorded and properly reflected (like tick box questions can) is another matter. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:47. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.