Maneuvering speed
Refering to C172N POH, the higher your aircraft weight, the higher is your maneuvering speed.
eg. 2300lbs, max maneuvering speed 97kts, 1900lbs, max maneuvering speed 85kts etc Why is the max maneuvering speed higher when weight is higher? |
cos when you are lighter you can reach the max load factor of the aircraft at a slower speed. If you produce X amount of lift on a plane weighing 2000lb, then produce the same X amount of lift on the same aircraft but this time only weighing 1750lb then the loading of the airframe will be greater. Because Va normally relates to a maximum loading, then in order to not exceed this loading for the lighter aircraft they limit the airspeed, and hence the maximum amount of lift it produces and keeps the airframe within loading limits
|
Because the wing loading is higher and therefore the stall AoA is lower (remember - THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS STALL SPEED!). There is such a thing as a stall speed, but it does need to be defined! |
Va is the speed in which above it, it is possible to damage the aircraft structure before a positive stall is achieved with positive loading.
You can find this on a V-G diagram. ** Two identical aircraft are flying at the same speed. The heavier aircraft must maintain a higher AoA to maintain its straight and level flight path, compared to the lighter aircraft, which has a lower AoA Hence for the lighter aircraft to reach the critical AoA (same for both aircraft) you need to pull harder to achieve the stall, in which some cases, you may exceed the maximum allowable positive G-Load factor for the airframe. Simply put, a heavier aircraft is easier to stall than a lighter one. I'm sure if you search the forums there are multiple threads on this topic, and many different forms of explainations |
Because the wing loading is higher and therefore the stall AoA is lower (remember - THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS STALL SPEED!). As for the original question, it's just like Captain Andrew said. With a higher wing loading you reach stall before you overstress the plane from a higher (i.e. greater speed) starting point than at a lower wing loading, exactly because critical AoA is constant but airspeed for a given AoA is proportional to the square root of current wing loading. Ciao, Dg800 |
Because Va normally relates to a maximum loading Or so I read. |
Yes of course, I must have been asleep when I posted that, Stall AoA is a constant and I knew that, but the speed at which you reach it depends on loading. So there is still no such thing as stall speed. Or there are an infinate number of stall speeds - take your pick. :E
|
I personally prefer the expression: "For a given wing loading, the stall speed is constant." :ok: This takes into the account both the static wing loading and the momentary load factor, which indirectly influences stall speed by changing the actual wing loading (actual_wing_loading = static_wing_loading X load_factor).
Ciao, Dg800 |
Dg - do you fly aeros? IAS is relatively unimportant when the 'G' loads are changing rapidly. AoA rules, you fly angle of attack, and as I've said before I'd gladly throw out a handful of the (not many) instruments in the Chippy for an AoA indicator!
|
Dg - do you fly aeros? IAS is relatively unimportant when the 'G' loads are changing rapidly. AoA rules, you fly angle of attack, and as I've said before I'd gladly throw out a handful of the (not many) instruments in the Chippy for an AoA indicator! As I have no AoA indicator I still have to estimate stall speed for a given bank angle if I want to keep on not crashing into the mountainside every time. :} Ciao, Dg800 |
If you're painfully curious and want to know the textbook answer, most of the aircraft we fly are certified originally to an FAA Part 23 basis, for which the definition of the design speeds can be found here: 14 CFR 23.335.
The long and short of it is that at V_A, you should be able to apply full deflection in any singular control axis and not damage the aircraft. The weight dependancy simply comes from rearranging F=ma to a = F/m; As you decrease the aircraft's mass, you will have a greater accelaration. Since you want a constant accel (say, 6G), you reduce the speed such that you stall first. Key thing to note is that V_A says nothing about cyclic application of controls - If you swing the rudder from stop to stop with abandon, even below V_A, don't be surprised if the tail falls off! :sad: |
Key thing to note is that V_A says nothing about cyclic application of controls - If you swing the rudder from stop to stop with abandon, even below V_A, don't be surprised if the tail falls off! Ciao, Dg800 |
Originally Posted by Dg800
you can apply full deflection in one axis only
|
If you're applying the 'G' gradually as in pulling into a steep turn, you can 'pull to the buffet' if your aeroplane is gentlemanly enough (like the Chippy) to afford you such a warning. In aeros, however, the 'G' is often pulled on quite sharply and it's dead easy to go straight through buffet (even if there is some) into departure.
Also, some aeroplanes (the Yak 52 comes to mind from my experience, though I've heard the Harvard and others do it too) will readily flick out of a manouvre with no warning if the aeroplane is even a bit out of balance when stall AoA is exceeded. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:47. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.