PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   Would you? (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/476485-would-you.html)

Roff 6th Feb 2012 19:54

Would you?
 
RVR 750 - BKN 200 feet
would you take off?

hobbit1983 6th Feb 2012 20:00

It depends......

Jan Olieslagers 6th Feb 2012 20:31

Depends very much, indeed.
And some milk to my tee, if yer daugnt maynd.

Grassfield 6th Feb 2012 20:36

Solid overcast all the way to FL200 or a 300ft thick layer of stratus? Similar weather on a 100nm radius or just the nearest 2nm? Multi engine-single engine? Piston or turbine? Equipment/instrumentation of aircraft? Experience of pilot?

Yes indeed, it depends...

thing 6th Feb 2012 20:37

I thought this was going to be about Penelope Cruz...:{

Russell Gulch 6th Feb 2012 20:45

I would if I could at you age, old boy!

Roff
Profile:
Age: 92

Genghis the Engineer 6th Feb 2012 22:21

I have an IMC not an IR, that is outside my personal limits on RVR, plus the line between BKN and OVC in my experience is very small so it's as likely as not to be outside of my ceiling limits. So no.

If it was more marginal, then nonetheless there's an old adage that is always worth remembering:

"If there's doubt, there's no doubt".

and another reliable adage:

"Landing is mandatory, but take-off is optional".

So still no.

G

Roff 6th Feb 2012 22:43

Cheers G
I was happy with it as i knew i could be ontop by 1000ft and my
destination was VFR but i knew a few people who didn't fancy it.
Just wanted a general feel from the Ppruners :ok:

Genghis the Engineer 6th Feb 2012 22:47

An engine problem at 800 ft would have been fun !

G

Roff 6th Feb 2012 22:57

As ever.......

rata2e 6th Feb 2012 22:59

"I have an IMC not an IR, that is outside my
personal limits on RVR, plus the line between
BKN and OVC in my experience is very small so
it's as likely as not to be outside of my ceiling
limits."

Wanna check your definitions too G?

Contacttower 6th Feb 2012 23:04

Would you have been able to return to the airport in those conditions?

I'm guessing only the presence of an ILS or another airport nearby that had better weather would have allowed for a return if one had a problem after take off.

If for some reason my usual policy of not placing myself under pressure to depart for a particular reason had failed, and I really needed to leave then yes I would depart. Obviously one could have an engine failure in the soup but there is nothing from an instrument flying point of view that makes that take off impossible.

Genghis the Engineer 7th Feb 2012 07:17


Originally Posted by rata2e (Post 7004054)
"I have an IMC not an IR, that is outside my
personal limits on RVR, plus the line between
BKN and OVC in my experience is very small so
it's as likely as not to be outside of my ceiling
limits."

Wanna check your definitions too G?

Realising that what I meant, but didn't say, was 'for a return to the field'. I've done that enough times over the years to consider the ability essential.

G

peterh337 7th Feb 2012 07:21

Sure you won't be able to land back (unless there is an ILS) but that is a risk no different to other risks in aircraft operation.

If you are expecting a fire in the cockpit at any moment after departure, then I would agree that being able to land back at the airport of departure is fairly important...

The higher altitude wx (icing conditions, etc) is obviously most relevant to whether one should go or not, but one doesn't need a 200ft overcast scenario for that to be relevant.

S-Works 7th Feb 2012 07:21

I assume a light GA aircraft I assume you had a fully coupled autopilot or were just accepting that you would be unable to return to the departure airport as it was below minima?

Genghis the Engineer 7th Feb 2012 07:40


Originally Posted by bose-x (Post 7009336)
I assume a light GA aircraft I assume you had a fully coupled autopilot or were just accepting that you would be unable to return to the departure airport as it was below minima?

The last.

I've had enough things crop up, including a few engine issues, within the first 1-2 minutes after take-off over the years that I value the ability to circuit and land back and would not willingly get airborne if that option's not available to me.

There's always some exceptional set of circumstances you can think up, but not very often.

And as this was in the private flying page, yes, I was assuming a light single. I can't, myself, see that an A/P makes any difference to the decision.

G

S-Works 7th Feb 2012 08:21

RVR old chap... Whats the RVR requirements for your flight using your IMCr? 1800m..... You may not take off or land if the viz is less than 1800m......

The requirements for an IR holder are that for SPA the RVR has to be 800m or greater. That restriction may be removed if you are fitted with a fully coupled auto pilot in which case for an IR holder it then becomes the plate minima or the AP minima whichever is greater.....

Genghis the Engineer 7th Feb 2012 09:00

So, the answer is still no!

The question was 'would you?'. I wouldn't, and I'd argue that even if technology and ratings make it just about legal, most other pilots shouldn't either in an SEP. The margins are just too small.

G

JW411 7th Feb 2012 09:38

Bose X:

There is a slight difference between RVR and Visibility but then I am sure you know that already.

S-Works 7th Feb 2012 11:25

Yes I do. I also know full well how to calculate them. I was however trying to keep it simple....


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.