A and C, Rob wants to say:
Time does indeed change iwrbf. What reinforces the policy is scale - not time. What worked with 5000 signed up users becomes invaluable and essential with 375,000. The advent of google and SEO means that an average 23% of visitors are first timers and the tiny proportion who aren't house trained becomes a very large number indeed. Our chum at the top of the thread was one of them. You either have a site run by real, active pilots or you substitute them with minimum wage cubicle bunnies in a glass office who can send out boilerplate explanations to the annoyed. Or as I would say: Kick the few problematic ones out before they found a basis for trouble. I DO understand this. I just wanted to suggest that the acting moderator shortly explains: "I have a reason for this". Kind (and respectful) regards Rob, Peter |
iwrbf
Thank you for putting that into a form of English that I can understand!
|
Well I can't say why he was banned because it wasn't me who banned him!
A&C, what Rob was trying to say was the OP has been a naughty boy! :} |
Quite a few people, for example, have been banned for things they've sent (such as advertising or abuse) by PMs that you'd not even see on the forums.
I don't know in this case, as it wasn't me who banned him either. Ultimately however, volunteer mods with limited time just can't go doing lengthy explanations (and subsequent arguments) with each banning. Most people I've banned as a mod, it's been for blatant advertising. G |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:58. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.