Operating Cost for C150 or PA28?
Hi Guys,
Im looking for a rough guide to operating costs of a C150 and PA28 and have looked on google etc and cant find anything specific! If anyone knows what the costs would be for insurance, maintenance, hourly fuel costs and CofA. Any feedback greatly appreciated in advance :ok: |
For my C150 roughly:
Insurance: €1100,-/year Maintenance: it depends Hourly fuel costs: Mogas 19l x €1.6= €30/hr, Avgas 19l x €2.3=€44/hr CofA including 100hr check and avionics: €900,- -Kees |
Similar aeroplane to PA28 (O320 160HP):
Annual £1800 50 hrs £300 Insurance £1400 Hangarage / airfield use £1500 Repairs £500 32L Avgas per hour |
True costs for a C150 based in South of U.K. over last 12 months:
Insurance £ 1,056.00 Radio Licence £ 20.00 Maintenance £ 3,267.92 Airport Fees £ 3,195.04 Plus fuel, say 21 litres per hour (actual burn usually less), and this covers pretty much all that you need except for the occasional litre of oil between changes. Don't forget to allow for an engine fund towards the eventual replacement/refurbishment and remember that the airframe will need respraying about every ten years. |
Privately owned PA 28 Warrior always £10,000 per year. 100 hours flying.
Average total hourly cost of a light single is 2.5 X cost of fuel per hour. UV |
Including fuel? Sounds pretty expensive to me otherwise!
|
What UV says.
Cost me £10000/yr PA28 181 Transport Cof A 250 hrs/yr plus fuel. Two consecutive annuals cost £5500 & £4500 plus VAT. Insurance for club use £2100 Aircraft was 22 years old. DO. |
Englishal, if you are refering to my post then, as I say, total cost!
UV |
My Cessna 150M annual cost (Canadian $)
Insurance: $1600 Hanger (free at home, but worth): $900 Annual Inspection: +-$1000 Annual recalibration of altimeter/txp $250 Mags: $100 Alternator: $75 Engine reserve: $500 Cosmetic reserve: $500 = $4925 fixed costs per year, plus +-$20 per hour Mogas and oil So, if I fly 100 hours a year: $70 per hour total cost... and worth every penny! The best plane I could hope to have, owned it for 23 years... Pilot DAR |
try a pa38
hi.
why not consider a pa38-112 tomahawk it's a far more spacious aircraft compared to a 152 and much more rewarding to fly. costs for a year £1800 annual with radio etc insurance for a PPL IMC with 160 hours £840 21 liters an hour very reliable. |
But they don't call them a traumahawk for nothing.
|
Cessna 150L
Annual - last one cost £3900 but various parts were needed. This year (ARC renewal and annual/150 hr service should be under £1800) 50 hr checks - do them yourself, so just the cost of oil (+£50 for an engineer to oversee). Insurance - £900 (2 named drivers plus any instructor/examiner) with Traffords Fuel - 23 litres an hour seems to cover starts/taxy time/flying time Hangarage - got my own so zero Ongoing maintenence - pay for whatever goes wrong. Our costs have been £480. Engine - ditto. Actual costs this year based on 110 hours is £48/hr |
My group has just been given a £10,000+ bill for an annual on (what I think) is generally a very well maintained PA28.
Bad things can happen. |
I hope the
£10,000+ bill Tomahawk is very good aircraft, as long as really short or rough runways aren't in your flying plans, and you get some conversion training in one. If someone has been traumatized in one of these aircraft, I would suggest it was a result of inadequate training or technique - not the plane itself. Different planes do have different characteristics, it's up to pilots to learn them well, then those pilots won't be traumatized. I know this because I checked myself out on that type, and should have sought training - good plane, foolish me! Pilot DAR |
C150 PA28 Running Costs
Looking at those bills seems like another good reason to dump Part M aircraft and go the LAA route.
At £5000/£10,000 for an Annual Inspection, barmy ! You would end up buying the aircraft again every three years. At those prices rent instead. The figures just don't stack up. Once the "Engineers" see their flock dwindling they will have to sit up and take notice. Vote with your wings and ditch them, would you allow your car garage to fleece you in the same way ? |
Based on a figure I saw elsewhere that Cessna 150's require an overhaul every 1,800 hours..
Other than the 'safety first' aspect, why is that the engines require such extensive work in such a short time? cf a car engine, which if serviced correctly will last 250k+ without issue.. Especially as I percieve aircraft engines to be less complicated than car engines, and rev a lot lower :confused: |
The 1800 hour overhaul time on the O-200 (and similar for nearly all other such engines) is a manufacturer's recommended interval. In Canada, and other placed I'm sure, it is only mandatory for commercially operated engines. Private aircraft can operate "on condition". My O-200 went happily to more than 3600 hours (with some interm cylinder work). At that point, I opened it up because I found some ferrous metal in the filter, the source of which could not be confirmed. It turned out that the engine was magnificent inside, and it was only a crimped on cover on the alternator drive making the metel (which really had nothing whatever to do with the critical internal workings of the engine). If taken care of, those engines have an amazing life span, because, yes, run properly, they really don't work that hard compared to a modern car engine!
Pilot DAR |
gyrotyro wrote........
Once the "Engineers" see their flock dwindling they will have to sit up and take notice. |
1800 hours is the car equivalent of around 60,000 miles. If you remember cars with engines designed 40 years ago you'll recall that all sorts of maintenance was required to get them to go anything like 100k miles - and whilst you can get a car back on three cylinders, aircraft tend to take exception.
|
A few comments
The C150 may be cheap to buy but it has a bit of a sting in the tail with corrosion issues around the main landing gear support that can cost a lot to fix, the C152 may cost a little more to buy but it is a very "sorted" aircraft with few AD's and most of the C150 "mistakes" corrected and an engine with a TBO of 2400 hours.
Flybymike The "traumahawk" as you call it was from a flying instruction point of view the best GA trainer to come out of the USA in the last thirty years, unfortunatly it now suffers from product support issues due to the 13000 hour spar life. This issue alone deters companys from producing parts for the aircraft and so makes it unatractive for a high use operation. Gyrotyro I think you should take notice of Bllink182 today I spent 2 hours in the hangar fixing aircraft and 6 hours pushing paper for this EASA part M. Not only is part M costing the customer lots of money but it is also taking the experienced engineers away from supervising and checking the quality of the work to push paper, the result is going to be that some companys are going to suffer a reduction of oversight on the hangar floor. Oversteer Aircraft engines run most of the time at 65-75% of max power output, a car engine spends most of it's working life producing 25% of rated power, Aircraft engines also spend a lot of time doing nothing, this lack of use is a killer when it comes to corrosion and finaly when your 200,000 mile car engine fails with a big bang you get out and walk, if an aircraft engine fails your survival is just a roll of the dice! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:40. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.