JAR-FCL PPL vs. NPPL
Hi
I'm a newcomer to flying training, and I'm interested in the relative merits of the JAR-FCL PPL vs. the NPPL. Initially the NPPL seems appealing since you can, in principle, qualify with only 32 hours flying time. However, there 's no realistic prospect that I will be competent to fly a plane in 32 hours, and maybe not in twice that many. So, given that the qualify time for the JAR-FCL is 45 hours, and I will undoubtedly need more hours than this, is there any point in going for the NPPL? I have a suspicion that this question may be academic, because I'm not sure I'd pass the JAR medical, given that my eyesight is ****. I appreciate that spectacles are allowed, but I believe there is a minimum standard of uncorrected vision that I may not meet. But, if that isn't the case, or I have my eyes adjusted by laser, is it worth even considering the NPPL? Any advice gratefully accepted. |
Originally Posted by mad_bear
(Post 2868531)
I have a suspicion that this question may be academic, because I'm not sure I'd pass the JAR medical, given that my eyesight is ****.
I wear contact lenses with the 'carry a pair of specs' endorsement on my medical. I have -2.0 and -2.25 (short sighted). never been a problem. As you are learning to fly (as per your previous post), perhaps seeing an AME for a class 2 would be cash well spent at this point? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:42. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.