PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   Feb Flyer Proof reader (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/161095-feb-flyer-proof-reader.html)

smarthawke 28th Jan 2005 12:43

Feb Flyer Proof reader
 
Has anyone asked for a job as a proof reader for Flyer - I thought 'Linbergh' (front cover) had a 'd' in it, ie 'Lindbergh'!

Sorry, just being picky and think that working for an aviation magazine must be more fun than most jobs. Perhaps I'll write and ask them if there are any vacancies!

rustle 28th Jan 2005 13:58

The spine, index and main article all have the "d", so it cannot be an alternative spelling ;)

Philip Whiteman 28th Jan 2005 18:23

I had been lying very low hoping nobody would spot that one...

From the same fingers at the keyboard (mea culpa) came 'suggets' on the cover of General Aviation (the AOPA mag) eighteen months or so back. No one spotted it, although I have cutting on the office wall as a reminder.

Working for an aviation magazine, particularly FLYER is indeed a fun job, even if the cock-ups are very public indeed.

Maxflyer 28th Jan 2005 18:44

Compared to the proof reading at the Gruaniad I think you are doing a marvellous job Mr. Whiteman.

BEagle 28th Jan 2005 19:04

Which poof reading "Teh Graundiad"?

Confabulous 29th Jan 2005 19:20

Did anybody else see on the contents page, the tiny piece about Brian Lecomber was upsidedown and backward? Either it's a good joke or the printer was having an off day. :ooh: :O

2Donkeys 29th Jan 2005 22:12

Confabulous

To be fair, I think that was intended as a joke :D

Pilgrim101 30th Jan 2005 05:12

What about the poor git who has to proof read PPRUNE :8

Irv 30th Jan 2005 09:32

I do remember inventing the term 'addiction fog' through a false click on the spellchecker for 'advection fog' - I accidentally hit replaces when I thought I'd hit ignore.

With hindsight, whislt admitting the mistake, I decided that the fog which has habitually formed over the airfield (but never at home when you decide to set off to drive there) ought to have a name, and that was as good as any.

Also, all schools were sent a wall poster in mid 2002 from a mag (NOT Flyer) advertising a competition to win an "NNPL"? No names - I was just glad I wasn't involved!

Irv

treadigraph 30th Jan 2005 11:44

Pilgrim, proof reading on PPRuNe appears to be like the old music hall expression: "ladies and gentlemen - mainly yourselves!"

I know with the couple of magazines and other printed matter that I've helped compile/edit, almost invariably some cockup, usually in the plural, slips through, and is the first thing you spot when you open the box from the printers...!

Love to work on an AvMag for the day job...

Genghis the Engineer 30th Jan 2005 12:18


With hindsight, whislt admitting the mistake, I decided that the fog which has habitually formed over the airfield (but never at home when you decide to set off to drive there) ought to have a name, and that was as good as any.
I thought it was called Popham :O

G

formationfoto 30th Jan 2005 17:31

Anyone who has been involved in what seems to be a stupidly complex process of putting together a magazine will know thet the capacity for cock up is immense. That the number of problems is so low is a credit to those who work in the mags who put all their effort into tracking down the weak links and sorting them (and I know Philip regards accuracy as vital). Despite this effort problems do crop up. One magazine I am aware of simply can not get the euro sign to travel from the editors screen to the printed page. I a recbt article I wrote de Havilland became De Havilland and back again a number of time as the article was touched by up to tthree different hands each prone to changing the previous persons correction. I think it was correct in the end but I dread opening the mag and finding errors in an article I have written. I take the following two weeks explaining to all I know that I really knew how spell the offending word.
I read all three of the UK GA mags and I have to say bar the odd silly mistake they are all generally excellent for accuracy.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:37.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.