Grandpa, what’s the farthest you can see?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Grandpa, what’s the farthest you can see?
Not my current myopia but an interesting question from a six year old. Above what height does the visual distance on the globe stop increasing. At about 35,000 I’ve always estimated my field of vision to be about 700 miles on the surface. Never been higher, I guess I could have done it mathematically but I’m too lazy.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Hello!
Mee too (lazy), but if you really want to impress your six year old grandson then you tell him that the fartest you can see with your naked eye is the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) which is 2.5 million light years away. Which in km would be: 23651826000000000000
Mee too (lazy), but if you really want to impress your six year old grandson then you tell him that the fartest you can see with your naked eye is the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) which is 2.5 million light years away. Which in km would be: 23651826000000000000
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,618
Received 293 Likes
on
161 Posts
Can't answer the question posed but in terms of seeing things at a distance...
While sitting high up on my local common in south London on clear winter days after sunset, I can see sun lit vapour trails right down on the western horizon. With the aid of ADSB I have often been able to work out which aircraft they are and the furthest I can see them is about halfway across the Irish Sea and down beyond Truro. This last observation was confirmed by a Martinair 747 which passed over me and its trail was still visible as it passed abeam Truro which is about 230 miles. Another good one was a Ryanair 737 out of Cork to Gatwick; spotted the trail abeam Milford Haven and watched till around Dorset when it disappeared as it began to descend. I probably could have seen the lights as it flew the approach onto 26 at Gatwick, but 30 mins or so after sunset it's beginning to getting a bit dark and I have mile of common to cross with attendant tree roots, cow pats and other unpleasant hazards in the grass!
During Lockdown with fewer aircraft about, one lengthy trail stood out in the early evening NW sky with a couple of turns in the trail, I spotted it abeam Chester and followed it down past Brum to London where it turned east heading towards Europe. A FedEx aircraft out of Dublin.
While sitting high up on my local common in south London on clear winter days after sunset, I can see sun lit vapour trails right down on the western horizon. With the aid of ADSB I have often been able to work out which aircraft they are and the furthest I can see them is about halfway across the Irish Sea and down beyond Truro. This last observation was confirmed by a Martinair 747 which passed over me and its trail was still visible as it passed abeam Truro which is about 230 miles. Another good one was a Ryanair 737 out of Cork to Gatwick; spotted the trail abeam Milford Haven and watched till around Dorset when it disappeared as it began to descend. I probably could have seen the lights as it flew the approach onto 26 at Gatwick, but 30 mins or so after sunset it's beginning to getting a bit dark and I have mile of common to cross with attendant tree roots, cow pats and other unpleasant hazards in the grass!
During Lockdown with fewer aircraft about, one lengthy trail stood out in the early evening NW sky with a couple of turns in the trail, I spotted it abeam Chester and followed it down past Brum to London where it turned east heading towards Europe. A FedEx aircraft out of Dublin.
While sitting high up on my local common in south London on clear winter days after sunset, I can see sun lit vapour trails right down on the western horizon. With the aid of ADSB I have often been able to work out which aircraft they are and the furthest I can see them is about halfway across the Irish Sea and down beyond Truro. This last observation was confirmed by a Martinair 747 which passed over me and its trail was still visible as it passed abeam Truro which is about 230 miles.
Descriptions of low angle sightings of 200+ miles definitely not allowable.
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember that at 6ft the horizon is at 3 miles.
At 35,000 its 229 miles apparently calculator
Correlates with treadigraphs observations
At 35,000 its 229 miles apparently calculator
Correlates with treadigraphs observations
I remember one morning flying east when coming up to Strumble in South Wales, on an incredibly clear day, being able to see the whole of the east coast of England from Kent to the Humber. Amazing, the mapmakers were right after all!!
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,618
Received 293 Likes
on
161 Posts
Oh, you are not allowed to say that, the air of London is officially desperately polluted. Must be right because the Mayor says so, so to avoid being asphyxiated in our beds we all have to give up our cars, the apparent source of it all, and travel only on public transport - which by the most amazing coincidence is a commercial operation of said Mayor, where they are short of money ...
Descriptions of low angle sightings of 200+ miles definitely not allowable.
Descriptions of low angle sightings of 200+ miles definitely not allowable.
Generally these severe clear days follow some cleansing heavy rain! On the pollution point, for 15 years I worked variously on the 16/17/18/19/20th floors of a tower block in Croydon with great views of London from Westminster to Heathrow and beyond; after heavy rain/wind, the early morning view in the sunshine was superb. By lunchtime a distinct yellowy-brown stain would be starting to make the buildings less distinct. I once flew in a C150 out of Lasham on a sunny day with a hazy sky. We climbed to about 3000' into an azure sky and a yellow tinge topped the smoggy crap below us...
Moderator
I was up flying the other day to appreciate the autumn colours, and could see the cliffs at then north of Georgian bay 114 miles away from 3500 feet. I could just make out New York State across Lake Ontario to the south, 85 miles away, though the shore is not as prominent.
Hey Mr 'T',
Whilst sitting at Sydney ATS Centre, we could see contrails in the setting sun to the 'far' west, travelling N / S and E / W , and we knew by the E/W ones that they were over Griffith (NSW) which is approx 260nm west of SY... the N/S ones transiting Melbourne / Brisbane....Had it not been for the Great Dividing Range to the West of SY, elevation approx 3,400ft AMSL, then we might have got further.....
Cheers
Whilst sitting at Sydney ATS Centre, we could see contrails in the setting sun to the 'far' west, travelling N / S and E / W , and we knew by the E/W ones that they were over Griffith (NSW) which is approx 260nm west of SY... the N/S ones transiting Melbourne / Brisbane....Had it not been for the Great Dividing Range to the West of SY, elevation approx 3,400ft AMSL, then we might have got further.....
Cheers
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NV USA
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great question, from 35K on a perfectly clear night the city lights start coming into view out the front from about 200 miles away. This would check out with Treadigraphs observation of contrails disappearing over the horizon around 230 miles away. Andromeda galaxy, great answer!
Hello!
Quote:
Originally Posted by effortless View Post
... I guess I could have done it mathematically but I’m too lazy.
Mee too (lazy), but if you really want to impress your six year old grandson then you tell him that the fartest you can see with your naked eye is the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) which is 2.5 million light years away. Which in km would be: 23651826000000000000
Quote:
Originally Posted by effortless View Post
... I guess I could have done it mathematically but I’m too lazy.
Mee too (lazy), but if you really want to impress your six year old grandson then you tell him that the fartest you can see with your naked eye is the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) which is 2.5 million light years away. Which in km would be: 23651826000000000000
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks all, after discussion with the sprog, I found that he had been looking at a picture of the world from space. When the whole disc was visible, he worked out that he couldn’t see the whole surface of the hemisphere due to the angles. So the surface disappears round the corner, as he put it, long before the edge. That is if looking down on the pole, we couldn’t see the surface at the equator. So his question is, how far from earth does an astronaut stop seeng more of the earth.
** 0.0000166 of a second, roughly. I think, if you're in a small sailing boat and the lighthouse is on the horizon. While the light is travelling towards you your boat will move 0.0000355 of a metre in whatever direction your CMG might be, which is something to take into account when doing a running fix using the lighthouse.
In the old days at Nav school, we were taught:
Radio Range Line of sight formula. = 1.22 X Sq. Root of Aerial Height + 1.22 X Sq.Root of A/C height.
Thus assuming you are looking at the sea level horizon at 24000ft. Line of sight = 189 nautical miles.
For terrain, substitute terrain height for Ae Ht. eg ground elevation 3000ft, A/C height 24000ft.
You can expect to see the top of the terrain at:
67 nm (terrain height)+ 189nm (A/C height) = 256nm
Radio Range Line of sight formula. = 1.22 X Sq. Root of Aerial Height + 1.22 X Sq.Root of A/C height.
Thus assuming you are looking at the sea level horizon at 24000ft. Line of sight = 189 nautical miles.
For terrain, substitute terrain height for Ae Ht. eg ground elevation 3000ft, A/C height 24000ft.
You can expect to see the top of the terrain at:
67 nm (terrain height)+ 189nm (A/C height) = 256nm
Last edited by DeanoP; 21st Oct 2020 at 00:12.
The hardest question my three year old grandson asked some years ago was, "Grandpa, exactly what is electricity?" He is now doing some kind of a computer science degree at Cambridge. Perhaps he can now tell me!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Age: 63
Posts: 1,257
Received 152 Likes
on
95 Posts
From our top field in Yorkshire we can see on a clear day with Binoculars' the Humber Bridge support, around 70 miles. As for A/C we can easily see north bound turning A/C with landing lights on from East Midlands Airport a similar distance. As for the high level stuff it always has amazed me both the view from the A/C, but also looking at the A/C as to how far away vertically they are.
Cheers
Mr Mac
Cheers
Mr Mac
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From a height H you can see
w = R * acos(R / (H + R))
afar in each direction. R here is the readius of the earth (about 6360 km). The formula assumes that the earth is a perfect sphere (which it isn't, it's a bit thicker at the equator). If you're near to the ground increasing your hight has a large effect. If your eyes are 1 m above the ground you can see things about 3.6 km away, if they are at 2 m you can already see about 5 km. At 10 km height you can see all things about 350 km away. But the increase of radius of sight becomes smaller and smaller the higher you get. At 300 km (about the height of the ISS) the radius of sight is about 1900 km, at 1000 km it's 3350 km, at a million km (i.e. three times further away than the moon) it's 9960 km and at a billion km (from somewhere between Jupiter and Saturn) it's 9999 km. To be able to see all of a hemisphere you'd need to be infinitely far away (and the universe isn't infinite, and even if it where at that distance you'd only see the earth as a single, infinitely small point).
So the correct answer for your grandson (who seems to be a very smart boy;-) is that there's no point in the universe where you can see all of a hemisphere of the earth. And if he's already very far away going away further (even a lot) does help less and less - from the moon he can already see 99% and to see 99.9% he'd need to go ten times further away (beyond Mars). Also tell him to try to become good at math which will allow him to find the answer to such (and many more) questions.
w = R * acos(R / (H + R))
afar in each direction. R here is the readius of the earth (about 6360 km). The formula assumes that the earth is a perfect sphere (which it isn't, it's a bit thicker at the equator). If you're near to the ground increasing your hight has a large effect. If your eyes are 1 m above the ground you can see things about 3.6 km away, if they are at 2 m you can already see about 5 km. At 10 km height you can see all things about 350 km away. But the increase of radius of sight becomes smaller and smaller the higher you get. At 300 km (about the height of the ISS) the radius of sight is about 1900 km, at 1000 km it's 3350 km, at a million km (i.e. three times further away than the moon) it's 9960 km and at a billion km (from somewhere between Jupiter and Saturn) it's 9999 km. To be able to see all of a hemisphere you'd need to be infinitely far away (and the universe isn't infinite, and even if it where at that distance you'd only see the earth as a single, infinitely small point).
So the correct answer for your grandson (who seems to be a very smart boy;-) is that there's no point in the universe where you can see all of a hemisphere of the earth. And if he's already very far away going away further (even a lot) does help less and less - from the moon he can already see 99% and to see 99.9% he'd need to go ten times further away (beyond Mars). Also tell him to try to become good at math which will allow him to find the answer to such (and many more) questions.
In the days when civil airspace stopped at 29,000 ft I could fly my Vampire over the centre of London around midnight and look at the lights of Paris one way and an illuminated map of England the other.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks jtt but you are missing his point. Certainly you can see the whole disc but you cannot see the surface of the whole hemisphere. It is round the corner.