Basic and Traffic Service
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Basic service is all I need, it gives me:
1. When the engine quits or things go to shyte over the highlands I don't have to spend the valuable and limited time I have "introducing" myself as they already know even without radar coverage who I am , where I am coming from and going to, and what my current approximate position is based on the average speed of a spam can which should be enough to vector the cavalry to my approximate position then my fancy ELT that's registered with the emergency services will hopefully pinpoint my position from there and allow them to deliver any emergency resources needed such as first aid or Marlboros.
2. As for advising there is/may be other traffic, it's nice to have but unless I am flying under positive control I am never relieved from devoting 100% of my paranoia to my see and avoid duties.
1. When the engine quits or things go to shyte over the highlands I don't have to spend the valuable and limited time I have "introducing" myself as they already know even without radar coverage who I am , where I am coming from and going to, and what my current approximate position is based on the average speed of a spam can which should be enough to vector the cavalry to my approximate position then my fancy ELT that's registered with the emergency services will hopefully pinpoint my position from there and allow them to deliver any emergency resources needed such as first aid or Marlboros.
2. As for advising there is/may be other traffic, it's nice to have but unless I am flying under positive control I am never relieved from devoting 100% of my paranoia to my see and avoid duties.
If your flight conditions and/or nature of flight are such that you need advice on how to avoid conflicting aircraft
I would rather be in receipt of a Traffic Service in IMC etc rather than just a Basic.
Seems like common sense to me rather than arbitrarily following "rules".
1. When the engine quits or things go to shyte over the highlands I don't have to spend the valuable and limited time I have "introducing" myself as they already know even without radar coverage who I am , where I am coming from and going to, and what my current approximate position is based on the average speed of a spam can which should be enough to vector the cavalry to my approximate position then my fancy ELT that's registered with the emergency services will hopefully pinpoint my position from there and allow them to deliver any emergency resources needed such as first aid or Marlboros.
piperboy/fireflybob:
This is why when I did Farnborough LARS East, I encouraged people to stay on my frequency when crossing to Le Touquet, especially if they coasted out at SFD, even though it was outside my 'official' area of responsibility.
I had you identified on Basic (then called FIS of course) and I had a single button to press to contact D & D if the worst happened.
This is why when I did Farnborough LARS East, I encouraged people to stay on my frequency when crossing to Le Touquet, especially if they coasted out at SFD, even though it was outside my 'official' area of responsibility.
I had you identified on Basic (then called FIS of course) and I had a single button to press to contact D & D if the worst happened.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When the engine quits or things go to shyte over the highlands I don't have to spend the valuable and limited time I have "introducing" myself as they already know even without radar coverage who I am , where I am coming from and going to, and what my current approximate position is based on the average speed of a spam can which should be enough to vector the cavalry to my approximate position then my fancy ELT that's registered with the emergency services will hopefully pinpoint my position from there and allow them to deliver any emergency resources needed such as first aid or Marlboros.
Then there's no need to introduce yourself and spend time trying to explain everything.
If every man and his dog calls up trying to give their details just in case they might have an emergency, there will be no radio space left when you really do have an emergency!
Avoid imitations
Quote:
Bit of a problem where there is no radar service available.
Of course but the "Russian Roulette" rule still applies but you can manage the threat better by use of the best service that's available and/or avoid certain choke points etc.
If you're still not happy with that then stay on the ground or conduct all your flights in controlled airspace but even that can have "risks".
Bit of a problem where there is no radar service available.
Of course but the "Russian Roulette" rule still applies but you can manage the threat better by use of the best service that's available and/or avoid certain choke points etc.
If you're still not happy with that then stay on the ground or conduct all your flights in controlled airspace but even that can have "risks".
From an ATC assistance point of view, it's often preferable to fly in poor weather because it keeps a lot of potential conflicts on the ground and those who are airborne are likely to be more experienced pilots in better equipped aircraft. Those who use Farnborough Radar will know how swamped the controllers can become, especially at weekends.
Avoid imitations
SH650,
In an ideal world, I'd agree. But in UK, the system is different. It's not common to file VFR flight plans in the way that you will be used to doing because it usually isn't a legal requirement unless crossing an international FIR border and there isn't an effective flight following service for VFR unless you also make RT contact with a relevant ATC unit. Not even for IFR flights outside CAS. Our airspace is often very congested so pilots tend to use a LARS service on an "ad hoc" basis instead and are encouraged to do so by the authority.
In an ideal world, I'd agree. But in UK, the system is different. It's not common to file VFR flight plans in the way that you will be used to doing because it usually isn't a legal requirement unless crossing an international FIR border and there isn't an effective flight following service for VFR unless you also make RT contact with a relevant ATC unit. Not even for IFR flights outside CAS. Our airspace is often very congested so pilots tend to use a LARS service on an "ad hoc" basis instead and are encouraged to do so by the authority.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
en-route ATC units do not get VFR flight plans.
Otherwise you'll have to pay more controllers and open more positions to keep the airwaves clean.
it usually isn't a legal requirement
If we use flight following, handovers are mostly automated and electronic nowadays.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
it's good to file if going to remote areas for emergency sake
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire
Age: 48
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's the recommendation in the UK too, but there aren't any "remote areas" where most people do most of their flying.
Stay on the ground......? I wish we could. Unfortunately it's not possible or practical to fly many of our operations in CAS, so it's not unusual for us to be required to fly IMC outside.
Seems like many commenting are expecting some sort of control service with radar outside CAS - something which is an anathema to some airspace users. As stevelup says it's down to funding. Also it's a question of numbers - if a couple of light aircraft collide in Class G and nobody is hurt on the ground the authorities would just put it down to a random event. On the other hand if one aircraft was a large public transport aircraft and several hundred people came to grief I am sure the authorities would be taking some pretty large steps to ensure it doesn't happen again.
It's all a matter of risk management - at least in Class G airspace there is a certain amount of random separation with a/c flying different tracks and altitudes and as Shy has stated some a/c have TCAS but of course not all users have transponders.
Last edited by fireflybob; 10th Jun 2015 at 18:15.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: se england
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A rule of thumb to consider;
a. Are you out for a fly around on a nice day looking at various points of interest etc? A basic service would be fine as it does not restrict you in any way.
b. Are you going from A-B in nice or marginal wx? Ask for a traffic service. It is restrictive in the fact that you shouldn't change heading or levels without informing the controller as you may be subject to coordination with other aircraft.
c. Are you going from A-B in IMC? Ask for a deconfliction service. You will be passed advice/ instructions to assist you in maintaining standard separation from other seen aircraft. After any avoiding action, you will be released own navigation so you need to be able to navigate yourself from the point that you are released after such action. In all the above the aircraft commander is ultimately responsible for avoiding other aircraft.
1 final point. If your routeing takes you through any controlled airspace/ ATZ's you are responsible to obtain the clearances yourself. it's not the controllers responsibility to guess what you need.
Hope that helps.
a. Are you out for a fly around on a nice day looking at various points of interest etc? A basic service would be fine as it does not restrict you in any way.
b. Are you going from A-B in nice or marginal wx? Ask for a traffic service. It is restrictive in the fact that you shouldn't change heading or levels without informing the controller as you may be subject to coordination with other aircraft.
c. Are you going from A-B in IMC? Ask for a deconfliction service. You will be passed advice/ instructions to assist you in maintaining standard separation from other seen aircraft. After any avoiding action, you will be released own navigation so you need to be able to navigate yourself from the point that you are released after such action. In all the above the aircraft commander is ultimately responsible for avoiding other aircraft.
1 final point. If your routeing takes you through any controlled airspace/ ATZ's you are responsible to obtain the clearances yourself. it's not the controllers responsibility to guess what you need.
Hope that helps.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As someone said once said "how about you give me the service where I don't run into another aircraft and crash and burn?". Can't wait for mandatory ADS-B, so we can get rid of all these ridiculous and useless 'services'.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: se england
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ADSB will only work if ALL AIRCRAFT are fitted with the equipment. While you have your head inside avoiding the Cessna you can see on your ADSB you could run into the para motor, glider etc which isn't equipped. Any device that draws your attention into the cockpit when you are flying in a 'see and be seen ' environment is unsafe. You will never hit the things you see!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ADSB will only work if ALL AIRCRAFT are fitted with the equipment. While you have your head inside avoiding the Cessna you can see on your ADSB you could run into the para motor, glider etc which isn't equipped. Any device that draws your attention into the cockpit when you are flying in a 'see and be seen ' environment is unsafe. You will never hit the things you see!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ADSB will only work if ALL AIRCRAFT are fitted with the equipment. While you have your head inside avoiding the Cessna you can see on your ADSB you could run into the para motor, glider etc which isn't equipped. Any device that draws your attention into the cockpit when you are flying in a 'see and be seen ' environment is unsafe. You will never hit the things you see!
so having something that alerts you to most traffic is almost surely a net improvement
It will be mandatory on all flying objects eventually. The technology will become so cheap
which can lure some into a false sense of security
Unfortunately the see and be seen environment has a lot of limitations - fundamentally on the performance of the Mark I eyeball, so having something that alerts you to most traffic is almost surely a net improvement. Of course having the technology cheap, light, and low power enough to be in the vast majority of aircraft would be better.
So, that would be Flarm, then?
Had to put one in the glider to fly in France, the FFVV mandated it and then subsidised it. Paid about 600 euros over three years. Of course, nearly everyone needs to have it before it is really useful.