Aerodrome Light Signals. HELP?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: London
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aerodrome Light Signals. HELP?
Hello Forum,
Firstly apologies If I am posting this in the wrong section.
I'm currently working my way through my PPL exams - I'm slightly confused by the section of Aerodrome lights signals given to aeroplanes in the air and on the ground.
First Question:
Flashing green light to a plane in the air means "Return for Landing"
&
Steady Red light to a plane in the air means "Give way continuing circling"
How are these two light signals different?
Second Question:
What produced more severe wake turbulence? Heavy aircraft in the clean configuration or heavy aircraft in the dirty configuration?
Many Thanks,
Matthew.
Firstly apologies If I am posting this in the wrong section.
I'm currently working my way through my PPL exams - I'm slightly confused by the section of Aerodrome lights signals given to aeroplanes in the air and on the ground.
First Question:
Flashing green light to a plane in the air means "Return for Landing"
&
Steady Red light to a plane in the air means "Give way continuing circling"
How are these two light signals different?
Second Question:
What produced more severe wake turbulence? Heavy aircraft in the clean configuration or heavy aircraft in the dirty configuration?
Many Thanks,
Matthew.
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Welcome Matthew.
The light signals.... The difference between them is that one is green and flashes the other is red and doesn't
Seriously the difference is flashing green to an airborne aircraft is that they want you back on the ground, having (presumably) just departed. I can't think of why, my Instructor used to say it was that you've departed without paying the landing fee.
Whereas the red to airborne aircraft is intended to say that you will probably be given a (solid) green to land at some point but not yet, so stick around and you'll get down. This contrasts with flashing red which is basically you being told to
off somewhere else.
I couldn't see the point of knowing any of this until my first flight post PPL saw me lose my radio...
As for wake turbulence I would have thought dirty configuration but am guessing
Good luck
The light signals.... The difference between them is that one is green and flashes the other is red and doesn't
Seriously the difference is flashing green to an airborne aircraft is that they want you back on the ground, having (presumably) just departed. I can't think of why, my Instructor used to say it was that you've departed without paying the landing fee.
Whereas the red to airborne aircraft is intended to say that you will probably be given a (solid) green to land at some point but not yet, so stick around and you'll get down. This contrasts with flashing red which is basically you being told to
off somewhere else.I couldn't see the point of knowing any of this until my first flight post PPL saw me lose my radio...
As for wake turbulence I would have thought dirty configuration but am guessing
Good luck
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: yankton, sd
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
first...heavy clean
flashing green return for landing TO BE FOLLOWED BY STEADY GREEN FOR LANDING CLEARANCE
Steady RED while in the air means continue circling and give way to everyone else.
it is likely that if you get flashing green it will VERYsoon be followed by landing clearance
if you get steady red you could be there all day as in maybe the runway is damaged.
for NOW ,just memorize it by rote. NOTHING is wrong with ROTE memorization, full understanding will come with experience.
someday you might even learn about RED RIGHT RETURNING and you can ask about that. but just learn the stuff, and understanding will come.
flashing green return for landing TO BE FOLLOWED BY STEADY GREEN FOR LANDING CLEARANCE
Steady RED while in the air means continue circling and give way to everyone else.
it is likely that if you get flashing green it will VERYsoon be followed by landing clearance
if you get steady red you could be there all day as in maybe the runway is damaged.
for NOW ,just memorize it by rote. NOTHING is wrong with ROTE memorization, full understanding will come with experience.
someday you might even learn about RED RIGHT RETURNING and you can ask about that. but just learn the stuff, and understanding will come.
These things are archaic. I believe the signal meanings have not been updated (translated to modern terms) since WW2.
Effectively a flashing green means "continue approach." (It says "return for landing" A flashing white given to an aircraft in the air is less equivocal; "return to land at this aerodrome").
A steady red means, depending on your best guess if it happens, "orbit", or "circle the aerodrome".
Doesn't everyone carry cellphones these days? Last genuine radio failure I experienced as a controller we simply rang the aero club, asked for the students mobile number, gave her a call, and subsequently an approach/landing clearance.
I'd learn the meanings verbatim for the theory test, but in the real world, rely on something else, frankly.
Effectively a flashing green means "continue approach." (It says "return for landing" A flashing white given to an aircraft in the air is less equivocal; "return to land at this aerodrome").
A steady red means, depending on your best guess if it happens, "orbit", or "circle the aerodrome".
Doesn't everyone carry cellphones these days? Last genuine radio failure I experienced as a controller we simply rang the aero club, asked for the students mobile number, gave her a call, and subsequently an approach/landing clearance.
I'd learn the meanings verbatim for the theory test, but in the real world, rely on something else, frankly.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aerodrome Light Signals. HELP?
Not to confuse a student, but I'd have thought a heavy/dirty configuration would produce more wake turbulence. Wake turbulence is caused by the differential in the air pressure between the top and bottom of the wings. As these meet -at the wing tips, and the edges of the flaps- they cause vertices or violently spinning air. Think a mini horizontal tornado.
A heavy aircraft with flaps and gear out is flying at a higher AOA, therefore higher pressure difference.
A heavy aircraft with flaps and gear out is flying at a higher AOA, therefore higher pressure difference.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 72
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: yankton, sd
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Checkride Heavy, Clean, And Slow - Flight Training
here it says that Heavy Clean and SLOW is the worst
here it says that Heavy Clean and SLOW is the worst
So you're out flying and your radio quits. Some how the tower notices this and shines a steady red light at you. So you circle. Do you fly a holding pattern, fly 360s, fly the traffic pattern but do not descend, obit the field three miles out? Circling is a very broad term. At some point the tower gets tired of you and realizes you're not going to depart the area for the uncontrolled field 10 miles away so they flash the green light at you. So now you set up for landing and you hope to see a steady green light on final.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes
on
221 Posts
At some point the tower gets tired of you and realizes you're not going to depart the area for the uncontrolled field 10 miles away
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 72
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If they wanted you to go elsewhere, they would show a flashing red light.
No, the tower wouldn't. Flashing red, aerodrome unsafe, do not land. No requirement to go away.
No, the tower wouldn't. Flashing red, aerodrome unsafe, do not land. No requirement to go away.
Last edited by fujii; 6th Jun 2015 at 11:01.
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Skyhighfallguy,
The best way to explain it is to use the lift equation, L=Cl1/2PV^2S (sorry I can't use the actual mathmatical symbols). We say that heavy, clean and slow produce the greatest vortices.
To counteract weight, there needs to be lift, the heavier the aircraft the more lift required. So using the formula:
Assume an aircraft has full flaps, but reduces its airspeed from a nominal value of say 100KTs to 80KTs, to maintain the same amount of lift he needs to increase the Cl
Assume no flaps, so a reduced surface area to the first scenario, but he flies at 100KTs, he still needs to increase the Cl to maintain the same amount of lift
So adding these all in, if an aircraft has no flaps, and a low speed he needs an even further increased Cl to balance the equation. With that, we can then deduce why heavy, slow and clean is the worst configuration. Wing vortices increase in strength as the "deflection angle" increases ie. the angle of attack (which is the thing that changes the Cl of an aerofoil).
I hope this helps, but I'm sure there is someone here that can explain better
The best way to explain it is to use the lift equation, L=Cl1/2PV^2S (sorry I can't use the actual mathmatical symbols). We say that heavy, clean and slow produce the greatest vortices.
To counteract weight, there needs to be lift, the heavier the aircraft the more lift required. So using the formula:
Assume an aircraft has full flaps, but reduces its airspeed from a nominal value of say 100KTs to 80KTs, to maintain the same amount of lift he needs to increase the Cl
Assume no flaps, so a reduced surface area to the first scenario, but he flies at 100KTs, he still needs to increase the Cl to maintain the same amount of lift
So adding these all in, if an aircraft has no flaps, and a low speed he needs an even further increased Cl to balance the equation. With that, we can then deduce why heavy, slow and clean is the worst configuration. Wing vortices increase in strength as the "deflection angle" increases ie. the angle of attack (which is the thing that changes the Cl of an aerofoil).
I hope this helps, but I'm sure there is someone here that can explain better
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi MXB300,
Welcome to pprune.
Your two questions are typical of "exams" and "studying": ie not really relevant, at least in the way they are typically asked.
To treat the "heavy" one first: what people want you to know is that:
1. Induced drag (sometimes known as lift-induced drag) is directly proportional to lift. So, increase lift, increase induced drag.
2. To get more lift on a wing, you either have to fly faster (and get more air over it) or if you fly slower, then you get less air over it, so that air has to be used more efficiently. To do this, you increase the angle of attack of the wing.
3. As you increase the angle of attack, the lift-induced drag - ie wing vortices - increases.
4. Those vortices are the main contributor to wake turbulence.
So, a heavy aircraft "clean" will actually have to have a higher angle of attack to generate lift. So create more turbulence.
Now, you may ask, when might you get in a situation at your local airfield where a heavy is going to fly by "clean". And if you do, you are probably at an airfield where there is a tower with full ATC. And if there is, they will have separation minima which they will make you hold for.
So to me, the point of the question is to explore lift/drag etc, and not a "real world" this is what to do answer.
As for lights.
The Air Pilot does say you can fly into Glasgow International without a radio! No-one has done that for decades! I doubt Glasgow even has light signals, but could be wrong.
I know at another, smaller, licensed Scottish airfield, the Health and Safety said it was too dangerous to have batteries in the control tower. So they would have to be stored downstairs in a vented cupboard. Or why couldn't the light just be plugged in? Of course, the point for the airfield having batteries was if the power went off!
The answer there was that they have hand-helds, the fire truck has a radio and they allow non-radio traffic anyway. So if the aircraft radio fails, not an issue either.
As to light signals working, read the Flight of the Gin Fizz - a deaf US pilot following in Calbraith Rodgers first trans-continental flight route. Basically, being deaf he couldn't hear the radio. Even after contracting many airfields and being told they would use lights, he never saw the lights most times. Sometimes, airfields that said they had lights, didn't!
Me, if non-radio I would rather look out for other traffic than for non-existent lights!
Welcome to pprune.
Your two questions are typical of "exams" and "studying": ie not really relevant, at least in the way they are typically asked.
To treat the "heavy" one first: what people want you to know is that:
1. Induced drag (sometimes known as lift-induced drag) is directly proportional to lift. So, increase lift, increase induced drag.
2. To get more lift on a wing, you either have to fly faster (and get more air over it) or if you fly slower, then you get less air over it, so that air has to be used more efficiently. To do this, you increase the angle of attack of the wing.
3. As you increase the angle of attack, the lift-induced drag - ie wing vortices - increases.
4. Those vortices are the main contributor to wake turbulence.
So, a heavy aircraft "clean" will actually have to have a higher angle of attack to generate lift. So create more turbulence.
Now, you may ask, when might you get in a situation at your local airfield where a heavy is going to fly by "clean". And if you do, you are probably at an airfield where there is a tower with full ATC. And if there is, they will have separation minima which they will make you hold for.
So to me, the point of the question is to explore lift/drag etc, and not a "real world" this is what to do answer.
As for lights.
The Air Pilot does say you can fly into Glasgow International without a radio! No-one has done that for decades! I doubt Glasgow even has light signals, but could be wrong.
I know at another, smaller, licensed Scottish airfield, the Health and Safety said it was too dangerous to have batteries in the control tower. So they would have to be stored downstairs in a vented cupboard. Or why couldn't the light just be plugged in? Of course, the point for the airfield having batteries was if the power went off!
The answer there was that they have hand-helds, the fire truck has a radio and they allow non-radio traffic anyway. So if the aircraft radio fails, not an issue either.
As to light signals working, read the Flight of the Gin Fizz - a deaf US pilot following in Calbraith Rodgers first trans-continental flight route. Basically, being deaf he couldn't hear the radio. Even after contracting many airfields and being told they would use lights, he never saw the lights most times. Sometimes, airfields that said they had lights, didn't!
Me, if non-radio I would rather look out for other traffic than for non-existent lights!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd learn the meanings verbatim for the theory test, but in the real world, rely on something else, frankly.
His cellphone was in a bag in the back. Theoretically his passenger could have gotten it out and he could use that to call someone. That would have taken him, perhaps, five minutes. While holding in a CTR with several aircraft following him on the same arrival route. Not a good idea.
Fortunately the tower was on the ball (the lack of not just radio, but transponder as well must've given them a clue) and gave him light signals. He was safely on the ground a minute later. No drama whatsoever.
In addition to that - have you ever tried making a phonecall from inside the noisy cabin of a GA aircraft?
Personally, I think light signals are still a very good idea, even in 2015. If you remember red = bad, green = good, then you're halfway there.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Sometimes, airfields that said they had lights, didn't!
This query prompted me to look in Pooley's, which is the only book I carrywith me in the aircraft, to check whether it did actually have crib sheets for
- light signals
- marshalling signals
- interception procedures
these all being things that you never use but might, just, be useful once in a lifetime, and was somewhat disappointed to find that it didn't. One for the next edition chaps?
(I did have to follow a marshaller once, on a weather diversion to somewhere I hadn't planned to land. He waved his arms around, I went in the direction he was pointing. Seemed to work.)
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes
on
221 Posts
No, the tower wouldn't. Flashing red, aerodrome unsafe, do not land yet. No requirement to go away.
The advice given therein: (Flashing red light to aircraft in flight)
"Do not land, airfield closed".
There is no inclusion of the terms "unsafe" or "yet".
If you have plenty of fuel, I supose you could continue holding off, in anticipation of the re-opening. But it might not be today, of course. If you did so, you wouldn't endear yourself to the ATC'er who has to continue pointing the flashing the red light at you, until either the airfield re-opened, or you ran out of fuel and took the advice as intended.