Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

That grain of wisdom....

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

That grain of wisdom....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jan 2015, 02:40
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People usually forget clothing, headsets and bags as well. Once I had woman with a small purse of over 2kg... I don't wanna know what was in there The aircraft I fly is always on its rear CG limit before being too heavy, and those "little bags" really add up in the back.
Pirke is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2015, 07:34
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scales?

'That's what the scales at the flying club are for'.

This fascinates me. I can't say I can recall ever having seen scales at a flying club - ever. And on returning to flying in 2005 I visited about 12 flying clubs across the South-east of England over a period of two years. Although I do agree scales should be provided and their use by all personnel intending to fly mandated.

Personally, I never took passengers with me when flying and I always weighed myself and my kit on the bathroom scales at home. (My instructors always knew their own weight). So the absence of scales at the club or flying school never bothered me. I assumed most others must have done the same.

In the fifties even airline passengers had to be weighed before boarding; (in the days when BEA operated DC3s and Viscounts).

So which flying clubs do provide scales for members' use?

Regards,

BP.
BroomstickPilot is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2015, 08:08
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My grain of wisdom

I'm old in years but not in hours, but this is the main thing that underpinned my flying until I was compelled to pack in a few years ago on financial grounds.

I would say that to be a good pilot you need to be thorough, organised and meticulous, especially with the boring bits that you have to do on the ground, such as checking Met and NOTAMS. (How many times has a Red Arrows display been called off because some idiot has blundered into their display space because he/she clearly has not checked NOTAMS)?

Being meticulous and thorough, however, requires TIME. So it is necessary to arrive at the aerodrome with a good couple of hours to devote to it.

Every good flight commences with sound preparation on the ground. I made a checklist of all the preparations that had to be completed, or calculations made before flying, and laminated it in plastic. This could then be used every time I flew, completed items being ticked off with my permanent marker pen and the whole being wiped clean later in the day with some meths and a rag.

When carrying out a pre-flight inspection, (I hate the term 'walk-around check',) I would do the same things in the same order, so that if I was temporarily distracted then on resuming my check I knew exactly where I was up to.

Even my pilot case was divided up into compartments by partitions made from strong corrugated cardboard and packing tape so that everything I needed to fly had its proper place and its presence could be easily checked.

Well that's my two penneth.

Regards,

BP.
BroomstickPilot is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2015, 09:35
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So which flying clubs do provide scales for members' use?
There were some at Cambridge Aero Club. I haven't seen them recently, but they were hidden under a bookshelf or cupboard or something, you had to know they were there.

There's always the danger that if you do something helpful like provide scales they'll be removed by some H&S bod on the grounds that they're not calibrated. Thus forcing you to use the bathroom scales at home, which ... guess what! ... aren't calibrated either.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2015, 18:08
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF Benson FC definitely has scales. And IIRC the FOB says to use them...
tmmorris is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2015, 18:42
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tend towards the view that if i'm reduced to having to weigh things then we are probably too heavy anyway.
flybymike is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2015, 19:50
  #47 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,614
Received 60 Likes on 43 Posts
Assure the configuration of your aircraft (wheels, flaps, engine controls, fuel, etc.) before you do the next thing with it. Use a checklist if you like, but assure the configuration no matter what....
Pilot DAR is online now  
Old 5th Jan 2015, 01:44
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: nottingham
Age: 42
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airspeed

airspeed, airpseed, airspeed! I passed my PPL in March last year, 2014. this was drilled into me all the time.
Great advice, as often I would be looking external and my airspeed whilst not critical at critical points such as turn on final or takeoff - it was too close for comfort because i had been distracted!

Now its always correct and safe airspeed first.

I intend to complete my IMC this year and an Aero's course, all to help improve my flying and experience.

Ps, I am neither old or experienced but always look on here for experienced hands and advice, this is a great thread to learn from.

regards

Tris
PPLvirgin is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2015, 02:43
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,202
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
PPLVirgin

I call the ASI "the devils instrument" because falling under its siren spell is the beginning of the path to the aviation hell of inhabited by airplane drivers, not pilots.

I highly recommend you find a good instructor and go fly a bunch of circuits with the ASI covered. You will find that attitude plus power will always give you the desired airspeed and you can recognize the beginnings of gross deviations from the ideal by the feel of the controls
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2015, 03:04
  #50 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I've got to agree with BPF on the ASI issue. THe ASI is a wonderful instrument for assuring you that you're not flying the plane too fast (for those GA types capable anyway!). For slower flight, I would rather see the momentum/inertia, and flight path managed (which requires zero reference inside the cockpit in VFR flying). Feel the plane, and the momentum you carry, then consider the trend, and the available flight path. Do they all sum up to look good?

If you have honed this important "eyes out" skill, the rest of the flying is going to work out very well.
9 lives is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2015, 08:25
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIRSPEED...stop looking at the instruments.....

Forget what that guy said, if you were looking out for traffic you had your priorities RIGHT.

Of course in PPL training, they don't practice spins any more, but I certainly hope you could recognise approach to a stall? Even though some airline pilots have a problem with Airspeed, in any light aircraft or glider if you have ANY airmanship at all, you can FEEL your airspeed is OK. You don't have to nail it!
(Though it is useful to maintain proper approach speed when on approach; a quick glance at the ASI from time to time should do.)

Like I keep telling everybody, to become a good pilot, learn to fly WITHOUT an engine....in gliders. That will give you the true basics.

And LOOKOUT is the one that can save your life if it is your habit to always be aware of whats coming at you! After you have your ATPL, then you can blame the controller....
mary meagher is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2015, 19:06
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've said it before, been round the circuit at least twice with the pitot cover still on. I can't recall what the threshold speed is that I use. All down to my instructors beating "attitude" into me. Gliding I remember an old Polish guy who flew with almost no instruments in the panel being asked " how do you know how high you are?" "When my fag goes out it's high enough". Reliance on a bunch of numbers in a light aircraft is a nonsense. What is Vr? FFS.
Crash one is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2015, 19:14
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Wild West (UK)
Age: 45
Posts: 1,151
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
On my first solo I inadvertently left the alternate static open reducing the ASI by about 10 knots. On a gusty day in a Tomahawk I'm very glad I trusted my intuition that there was something wrong and added a fair bit extra.
abgd is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2015, 19:55
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Guys.

I know you mean well, but please stop telling newly qualified pilots that it's somehow 'cool' to ignore their ASIs during critical phases of flight, and to rely instead upon some mysterious sense of 'feel' they have not yet sufficiently developed.

Tris.

In time you will develop an inceasing 'sense' of what 'feels like' the right speed for various situations, but even then, you will use it in combination with the ASI. Have a great time with the IMC and aeros. Both of these will help develop that sense of 'feel'.


MJ
Mach Jump is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2015, 00:56
  #55 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but please stop telling newly qualified pilots that it's somehow 'cool' to ignore their ASIs during critical phases of flight, and to rely instead upon some mysterious sense of 'feel' they have not yet sufficiently developed.
How about we tell new pilots that it's okay for them to refer to the ASI, but not rely upon it? The underlying implication being that it may not work one day, so they best have a plan B.
9 lives is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2015, 01:16
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,643
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
so they best have a plan B
Absolutely. It's happened twice to me. Once after takeoff, due to a mud-dauber wasp's nest in the pitot. I had forgotten to check the ASI during the takeoff roll.

Once due to rain water in the system - and a water-ballasted Open class glider behind me. I elected to continue the takeoff rather than risk having the glider run into me, if I aborted.
India Four Two is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2015, 15:06
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: nottingham
Age: 42
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks MJ - good advice as always.

India Four Two - on your second point - in my naivety i would think that was pretty dangerous to continue as you might have put yourself in iminent danger? or were you aware that a glider behind would have been critical and needed to land anyway?

I know when my abort line is and what my ASI should be, so until i have much more extensive experience(although even then) if the ASI is not working I would probably abort - surely this is the safest thing to do at all times?

regards

Tris
PPLvirgin is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2015, 20:39
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPLvirgin, you sure have been brainwashed! I think you need to fly with a gnarly old instructor and ASK HIM TO COVER UP YOUR ASI!!!! If you have more than 20 hours solo, you will be pleasantly surprised that you can actually survive without being glued to the instruments.

India Four Two is plenty experienced or he wouldn't be a tug pilot. and he correctly weighed up the risks. If you are not actually flying in Instrument Flying Condition, even an average pilot can manage without most of them.
Do I need an ASI? no, not even on approach. three times flew with the pitot tubes taped up (my mistake, but no problem). And Altimeter? Cows get bigger. Trees look quite detailed. Radio up the duff? who needs a radio anyhow? GPS? follow the road. Or the shoreline.

The only thing that will spoil your entire day is meeting another aircraft which you fail to notice. Because you were fixing your attention inside the cockpit instead of outside.
mary meagher is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2015, 22:24
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Wild West (UK)
Age: 45
Posts: 1,151
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
surely this is the safest thing to do at all times?
'All' is a very big word.

What if, by the time you realise, there isn't enough time to stop before the end of the runway?

What if your aircraft doesn't have an ASI? My very first aircraft didn't. And I'm not talking about radio control ones. Though their pilots seem to manage pretty well too.
abgd is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2015, 23:14
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF Benson FC definitely has scales.
So does RAF Waddington FC. Must be an RAF thing. We just like to know stuff about people.
thing is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.