C172 -> PA28-161 Time needed to convert?..
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C172 -> PA28-161 Time needed to convert?..
I would value your opinion as to the length of time it would take to achieve solo status on a PA28.161.
I am a PPL holder, with c.80 hours, 30hrs C172SP, 35hrs C152, 10 hrs gliding and 5 other SEP's. I am yet to experience flight in the PA28.
With this in view, what time frame should one aim for to achieve solo standard in a PA28?
Kind regards to all informative replies in advance!
TODA.1
I am a PPL holder, with c.80 hours, 30hrs C172SP, 35hrs C152, 10 hrs gliding and 5 other SEP's. I am yet to experience flight in the PA28.
With this in view, what time frame should one aim for to achieve solo standard in a PA28?
Kind regards to all informative replies in advance!
TODA.1
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: The frozen north....
Age: 49
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Guess like everything in flying it varies person to person but as long as you've studied the POH and are reasonably current I'd suggest its probably only 1 or 2 flights. Seem to recall thats what I had to do but it was about 18 years ago!!!
Regards
UA
Regards
UA
I'd suggest its probably only 1 or 2 flights.
Do your homework with the POH, be familiar with the systems, speeds, mass and balance, and takeoff / landing performance. Then up to an hour of G/H and an hour of circuits should easily cover it for most folks.
MJ
I agree with MJ
Assuming you show up with good flying skills, Around 1 hour on the ground to go over the POH, systems, and the walk around and 1 hour flight time including 3 or 4 circuits to get use to the airplane.
Assuming you show up with good flying skills, Around 1 hour on the ground to go over the POH, systems, and the walk around and 1 hour flight time including 3 or 4 circuits to get use to the airplane.
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C172 -> PA28-161 Time needed to convert?..
My sign off from c152 to pa28 was a couple of flights with an instructor - one in the circuit with different approaches (normal/flapless/glide) and one doing stalls just to note the different characteristics in the stall. I think you could probably do it in one 90min flight (pilot dependent) if you have read the POH beforehand.
Main differences I recall are switching fuel tanks every half hour and adding fuel pump into your pre take off and pre landing checks. Also a bit more float in the flare due to lower wing and more pronounced ground effect.
Overall I prefer it to 152/172.
Main differences I recall are switching fuel tanks every half hour and adding fuel pump into your pre take off and pre landing checks. Also a bit more float in the flare due to lower wing and more pronounced ground effect.
Overall I prefer it to 152/172.
I agree with everybody else.
Three gotchas going from C172 to PA28:-
(1) Numerous instructors will advocate extra speed on approach. You really don't need it - stick to the speed in the manual.
(2) The manual says not to use use carb heat on approach unless there is evidence of carb icing. This is rather different to a C172 where it's pretty much mandatory. I have 100+hrs on a -161 and never saw signs of carb icing with, or without, the carb heat including right in the middle of the icing curve.
(3) No door on the pilots side, which is irritating as you can't get your pax strapped in then have a last walk around the aeroplane.
Apart from that, they are pretty similar to fly, enjoy.
G
Three gotchas going from C172 to PA28:-
(1) Numerous instructors will advocate extra speed on approach. You really don't need it - stick to the speed in the manual.
(2) The manual says not to use use carb heat on approach unless there is evidence of carb icing. This is rather different to a C172 where it's pretty much mandatory. I have 100+hrs on a -161 and never saw signs of carb icing with, or without, the carb heat including right in the middle of the icing curve.
(3) No door on the pilots side, which is irritating as you can't get your pax strapped in then have a last walk around the aeroplane.
Apart from that, they are pretty similar to fly, enjoy.
G
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(2) The manual says not to use use carb heat on approach unless there is evidence of carb icing. This is rather different to a C172 where it's pretty much mandatory. I have 100+hrs on a -161 and never saw signs of carb icing with, or without, the carb heat including right in the middle of the icing curve.
It took 4 minutes of carb heat and me wondering if we were going to be able to maintain altitude before we recovered full power. By that point, I was already within gliding distance of the airport I had diverted towards.
Don't take it for granted that a Lycoming powered PA28 won't get carb ice.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Normally the C152 to PA20-180 checkout at the club I instruct at is about an hour in the air.
However there is about three hours on the ground looking at the technical aspects such as W&B, aircraft performance and the Avionic system.
As the PA28-180 is the first aircraft that the guys will fly that can take them distances that can make fuel consumption and engine management critical and they can load the aircraft outside the limits while also being well away from the eye of an instructor we like to make sure that the guy is not going to make any stupid mistakes.
As the pilots have been trained to fly the C152 IAW the manual speeds we have no problem with them flying the PA28 at the correct speeds so the actual flying of the aircraft is not a big part of the conversation.
However there is about three hours on the ground looking at the technical aspects such as W&B, aircraft performance and the Avionic system.
As the PA28-180 is the first aircraft that the guys will fly that can take them distances that can make fuel consumption and engine management critical and they can load the aircraft outside the limits while also being well away from the eye of an instructor we like to make sure that the guy is not going to make any stupid mistakes.
As the pilots have been trained to fly the C152 IAW the manual speeds we have no problem with them flying the PA28 at the correct speeds so the actual flying of the aircraft is not a big part of the conversation.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had 4 hours on the PA28 when I got carb ice in 75% power cruise. At 1000 AGL. At night. (This happened just 2 nights ago.)
To the OP, I would say one flight with general handling and a few circuits chucked in at the end will do it. The biggest difference IMO is the view, you can actually see where you are going when you turn. Quite novel at first.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pa 28s are cool , quadrant throttle, low wing, rudder trim and all the diffs the above posters have mentioned which are all very valid.
But the coolest thing about the pa 28 is the manual flap lever. Electric flap is so naff and slow. It's the only aircraft where you can really show the effect of flap. Chunking the flap in shows that attitude change immediately. Electric flap is so slow the attitude changes kind of morph.
The best fun is demonstrating full flap to zero flap retraction in one go at go around speed ( at a suitable height). That will peel the skin back from your eyes and make you understand why you retract flap gradually.
Great training aeroplane.
But the coolest thing about the pa 28 is the manual flap lever. Electric flap is so naff and slow. It's the only aircraft where you can really show the effect of flap. Chunking the flap in shows that attitude change immediately. Electric flap is so slow the attitude changes kind of morph.
The best fun is demonstrating full flap to zero flap retraction in one go at go around speed ( at a suitable height). That will peel the skin back from your eyes and make you understand why you retract flap gradually.
Great training aeroplane.
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: EU
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About an hour or so. Also remember to switch fuel tanks.
Speaking of PA28 flap, I have seen people holding the lever up (giving an extra inch or so of travel above the last 'notch') and claiming it makes all the difference. Any thoughts?
Speaking of PA28 flap, I have seen people holding the lever up (giving an extra inch or so of travel above the last 'notch') and claiming it makes all the difference. Any thoughts?
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Speaking of PA28 flap, I have seen people holding the lever up (giving an extra inch or so of travel above the last 'notch') and claiming it makes all the difference. Any thoughts?
Drivel
Not a particularly unique system, but I just use the long hand of my watch.
If it's pointed right, I should be on the right wing tank; if it's pointed left, I should be on the left wing tank.
Tends to ensure a tank change about every half an hour, keeps me in balance, and requires virtually no mental effort to get right.
G
If it's pointed right, I should be on the right wing tank; if it's pointed left, I should be on the left wing tank.
Tends to ensure a tank change about every half an hour, keeps me in balance, and requires virtually no mental effort to get right.
G
I have seen people holding the lever up (giving an extra inch or so of travel above the last 'notch') and claiming it makes all the difference.
In that situation I think your hand would be better on the throttle ready to go around.
MJ
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tend to agree with Mach Jump, the extra flap movement will make no difference at all apart from putting the aircraft in the hedge at the far end of the runway because your hand is in the wrong place to get the power on for the go around.
As for 18 Greens pitch change demo, rather than demonstrating what you should not do, I would have favoured teaching the positive aspects of slowing the aircraft to about 70 KTS before deploying any flap thereby avoiding an uncomfortable amount of pitch change and being gentile on the aircraft.
As to it being a good trainer, it is an adequate trainer............ The C152, PA38 & DHC-1 are good trainers.
As for 18 Greens pitch change demo, rather than demonstrating what you should not do, I would have favoured teaching the positive aspects of slowing the aircraft to about 70 KTS before deploying any flap thereby avoiding an uncomfortable amount of pitch change and being gentile on the aircraft.
As to it being a good trainer, it is an adequate trainer............ The C152, PA38 & DHC-1 are good trainers.