why aren't Motor Gliders more popular?
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I operate the Tandem Falke comfortably from 250m of Tarmac in 5 knots. Clear approaches both ends though............
The big wings are a bit of a pain ground handling and on small manoeuvering spaces but you learn to live with it. The turning circle is not the best but you learn to live with it................the extended climb rate (400ft/min) is not the best but you learn to live with it...............the fuel burn is 2.5 gallons an hour but you learn to live with it..................
WRT to comments on touring I agree with the comments about the S-10 but you don't really buy something like that to go 'touring' in the conventional sense. You 'tour' other glider sites where you fit in the traffic patterns and airfield movements with minimal problems. If I had £100K and plenty of time to use it I'd buy one tomorrow.............
Arc
The big wings are a bit of a pain ground handling and on small manoeuvering spaces but you learn to live with it. The turning circle is not the best but you learn to live with it................the extended climb rate (400ft/min) is not the best but you learn to live with it...............the fuel burn is 2.5 gallons an hour but you learn to live with it..................
WRT to comments on touring I agree with the comments about the S-10 but you don't really buy something like that to go 'touring' in the conventional sense. You 'tour' other glider sites where you fit in the traffic patterns and airfield movements with minimal problems. If I had £100K and plenty of time to use it I'd buy one tomorrow.............
Arc
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no, 'tis a mobile snack-bar....one appendage for slicing boiled-eggs, sandwiches for the use of,,,,,,,the other for making chips(second pass needed to convert slices to sticks).
I'm fascinated by the links and pix....several look like a normal (gp A ? ) aircraft with a slightly larger wingspan, others are very definitely the archetypal sailplane with the enormousbendy wingspan (LAK, in particular)
Am I right in assuming all these Motor Gliders require the pilot to hold a full PPL with (AIUI) a TMG endorsement?
I believe the easiest licence to obtain is a pure gliding license, then comes Microlight, followed by SEP ???
I'm fascinated by the links and pix....several look like a normal (gp A ? ) aircraft with a slightly larger wingspan, others are very definitely the archetypal sailplane with the enormousbendy wingspan (LAK, in particular)
Am I right in assuming all these Motor Gliders require the pilot to hold a full PPL with (AIUI) a TMG endorsement?
I believe the easiest licence to obtain is a pure gliding license, then comes Microlight, followed by SEP ???
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, not all. Lak FES is a sustainer and needs no licence but gliding qualification/approval in the UK (pre EASA, and within the BGA), or even no qualification at all (outside the BGA), or a sailplane pilots licence (Post EASA). We are in a transition period until April 2015, when the latter will apply.
One Lak FES ( effectively a prototype for the modification) was developed to have self launching capability, but AFAIK one cannot buy one. If one could, it would be like other self-launching sailplanes (not TMG) and would need a licence. An ordinary PPL will not do – these are too different from normal GA types or TMG’s. I am not expert enough to say what will happen post EASA/April 2015t, but I expect somebody will explain.
Chris N
One Lak FES ( effectively a prototype for the modification) was developed to have self launching capability, but AFAIK one cannot buy one. If one could, it would be like other self-launching sailplanes (not TMG) and would need a licence. An ordinary PPL will not do – these are too different from normal GA types or TMG’s. I am not expert enough to say what will happen post EASA/April 2015t, but I expect somebody will explain.
Chris N
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Europe
You can hold an NPPL SLMG (not technically a 'full' SSEA PPL) or a JAR PPL with a TMG rating (a full PPL). A Glider licence on its own is not sufficient to fly an SLMG or TMG.
My earlier post refers regarding what I believe is easiest system for Gllider Pilots requiring to fly any glider with an engine - the FAA system in the US.
Arc
You can hold an NPPL SLMG (not technically a 'full' SSEA PPL) or a JAR PPL with a TMG rating (a full PPL). A Glider licence on its own is not sufficient to fly an SLMG or TMG.
My earlier post refers regarding what I believe is easiest system for Gllider Pilots requiring to fly any glider with an engine - the FAA system in the US.
Arc
Any motorglider I could afford (if I stretched my finances) is probably not going to soar any better than a Schweizer 2-33. Any motorglider that soars as well as my old 1-35C is way out of my price range.
Bryan
Bryan
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If one could, it would be like other self-launching sailplanes (not TMG) and would need a licence. An ordinary PPL will not do – these are too different from normal GA types or TMG’s. I am not expert enough to say what will happen post EASA/April 2015t, but I expect somebody will explain.
To fly a glider, you will need an Sailplane license (SPL) or Light Aircraft Pilot's Licence (Sailplanes) (LAPL(S)). They are pretty much the same, except for the medical requirements.
You also need to be trained in (and signed off by an instructor if you add it later) for the launch method - winch, aerotow, bungee or, (in the case being considered), Self Launch.
To fly TMGs, you need to add a TMG rating to the SPL or LAPL(S). You will also be able to add a TMG rating to a PPL or LAPL(A). So glider pilots will more easily be able to fly TMGs than they can now.
Paul
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not so much the technical issues that put me off motor gliders but the fact that I would most likely have to keep it at a gliding club.
I can't be doing with the endless politics, back biting and ridged inforcment of petty rules that a small minority of people who don't do much flying seem to impose on gliding clubs.......... All I can say is the majority of glider pilots must really like gliding a lot to put up with all the rubbish that is involved with gliding club membership !
I can't be doing with the endless politics, back biting and ridged inforcment of petty rules that a small minority of people who don't do much flying seem to impose on gliding clubs.......... All I can say is the majority of glider pilots must really like gliding a lot to put up with all the rubbish that is involved with gliding club membership !
Originally Posted by Arclite01
A Glider licence on its own is not sufficient to fly an SLMG or TMG.
Originally Posted by Arclite01
My earlier post refers regarding what I believe is easiest system for Gllider Pilots requiring to fly any glider with an engine - the FAA system in the US
Originally Posted by Arclite01
My personal favourite at the moment is the ASK-21Mi if I win the lottery.........or maybe the ASH-25e...........
Originally Posted by Arclite01
If you can find a TMG examiner.
I used to own and fly a Monnet Moni homebuilt single seat motor glider. Although it was no problem taking off (provided you remembered not to over rotate; engine was 300cc and about 30hp), landing was a bit critical as you had to 'fly' it on with no flare; if you flared, the lift decayed so quickly you would suddenly drop onto the runway and bounce! Stopping it on 800m was sometimes a bit marginal as it only had a wheel brake on the nosewheel, and that was just a hardened pad which rubbed against the tyre. The wheels were too small for it to be used on grass.
Only problem was, once you got airborne, with a sailplane like reclined seat, it would have been easy to relax and fall asleep!!
Only problem was, once you got airborne, with a sailplane like reclined seat, it would have been easy to relax and fall asleep!!
Last edited by chevvron; 15th Nov 2013 at 13:42.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 61
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is until you turn up at the average GA airfield - and find you cannot
get between the markers, cannot turn around, simply do not fit!
We have a Taifun at my field, needs three people to unfold it - I refer to it as a
Perodactyl. One person cannot actually move it when in the hangar. Virtually
needs a gale or the curvature of the earth to get airborne. Lovely when flying
and murderous on maintenance and care when not.
We also have a Grob -
which is much more practical - buit still needs a fair amount of space and has
an engine which seems quite frail. Endurance is certainly not everything.
get between the markers, cannot turn around, simply do not fit!
We have a Taifun at my field, needs three people to unfold it - I refer to it as a
Perodactyl. One person cannot actually move it when in the hangar. Virtually
needs a gale or the curvature of the earth to get airborne. Lovely when flying
and murderous on maintenance and care when not.
We also have a Grob -
which is much more practical - buit still needs a fair amount of space and has
an engine which seems quite frail. Endurance is certainly not everything.
I think you are being a little unfair Gasax. Having owned both, I think that the Taifun is the nicer aircraft and that (if both were left rigged) a Taifun is probably more practical than a Grob 109, being faster for the same fuel burn. T/O and Ldng distance for the two aircraft are about the same.
However, you are right in much of what you say.The Taifun will cruise at over 100kts burning less than 15 ltrs/hr for well over 600nm but with a low power to weight ratio take off and climb performance is not stellar - although this can be remedied by fitting an uprated engine/prop. I like the Taifun but I have to agree that it is now outclassed in performance by many of the modern generation of LAA aircraft.
TMGs all have the same problem in that by definition the wings are big (a Taifun is 17m span). As you say this is often a challenge at GA fields where marker boards can be awkward. It is also a problem in terms of hangar space. The Taifun wings fold back which cuts down on space but as you say is a pain to rig for an hour's flying. I think you will find that the Grob is just as bad if not worse.
Added to that is maintenance charges. While LAA owners can do their own thing, TMGs with a type certificate holder fall under the EASA banner. This is eased somewhat by having the BGA act as a CAMO but it still means compliance with all the EASA bulls**t.
This isn't to say the motor gliders don't have a role - the new generation of powered sailplanes are fantastic pieces of kit for exploring soaring possibilities - not great for touring though.
It comes back to the old chestnut - decide what mission capability you need and choose the best aircraft to fulfil it.