Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Motorway Flying ...

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Motorway Flying ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Nov 2013, 17:50
  #201 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: manchester
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please see below an email that has been sent to a senior Manager at Barton.

"You may be aware of the thread on Pprune, Ref:" Motorway flying". In a nutshell, are you able to obtain a trace from Hawarden, Liverpool or Manchester of my flight on the 2nd of November 2013 over the lunchtime period. The aircraft flown was G-AWPU and the exercise undertaken was operation at minimum level. The route started at Barton and the first leg was to Leigh Flash. The next leg took us to the Wigan flashes, after that we circumnavigated Wigan to the east and then flew west between Wigan and Standish. At the Gathurst junction I then followed the railway line to Burscough. At Burscough I then headed south to the M58 (Junction 3). I then tracked east to the M6 junction and then followed the the M6 south to the junction at the M62. At the M62 I then followed the motorway back to Barton.

I have already received the ATIS information during the flight period from the control tower, and therefore a trace of the flight would be much appreciated, if that is possible. There is no doubt whatsoever that I was on the above route and I feel that I need to prove this to a certain gentleman that claims I could not have been on the route I described. Also I would be grateful if you could obtain the METAR's at the local airports, if possible.

Feel free to contact me, should you wish to discuss any matters.

Regards"



I shall not post again until such time I have further evidence regarding the flight.
hotcloud is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 18:17
  #202 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hotcloud, how likely do you think it is that you will get this information? (trace/mode c)
rustle is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 18:36
  #203 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Unna, Germany
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jesus Herbert Christ.
Look, if you ARE going to take my name in vain, then at least get it right. It's Horatio, not Herbert.....
Steve6443 is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 18:41
  #204 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: manchester
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rustle

Not sure, but I will do my best to get the information.

Best if I don't post until I am in receipt of further evidence. I understand that "Spanner in the werks" has been advised not to post and I therefore wish to respect that position by not posting either until such time I am in receipt of further information.
hotcloud is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 18:46
  #205 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 975
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warton might provide a better trace, however, I suspect the low alt may preclude anything useful from any of the mentioned radar units. ( I am not having a pop but from previous experience even being below 1500' might not provide a usable trace)

Ivor
Ivor Fynn is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 18:54
  #206 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Motorway Flying ...

Hot cloud,
I wouldn't bother posting again whether you receive further info or not, it's pretty obvious to any rational or sane reader that the OP for whatever reason got ahead of himself and raised a ruckus over nothing not expecting any response, when one was received in a logical and reasonable manner the OP can't stomach withdrawing or back pedalling and instead appears intend on heading directly for Australasia by means of manual excavation.
piperboy84 is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 19:06
  #207 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoylake
Age: 50
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how likely do you think it is that you will get this information? (trace/mode c)
Quite likely I'd think, a similar thing happened to me a few years back doing a few orbits over the parents house on the Wirral, somebody on the ground decided I too was well below 500' and wrote letters, one to the flight school I hired from and one to LPL ATC. "serious breach of Rule 5" "having studied the ANO" "risking inocent lives on the ground with stupidity"
ATC investigated using mode c data and acoustic monitoring data and the lowest I went to was 596' AGL....

Then we can all feed someone some humble pie!
I was asked if I'd like to respond to the complainant, which I did thanking him for pointing out I can fly 96' lower next time, which I did.
Nearly There is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 19:13
  #208 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Originally Posted by hotcloud
Rustle

Not sure, but I will do my best to get the information.
Cool. Thanks for the sensible reply
rustle is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 19:27
  #209 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is G-AWPU fitted with a MODE C transponder? If so, was it squawking with MODE C during this flight?
If a radar trace cannot be obtained from EGCC/EGGP or EGNO, it may be worth asking the Barton management to contact NATS at Prestwick Centre. They should still have access to the radar data from St.Annes and Clee Hill, which, although distant from the area where these events occurred provide good low-level coverage. Do act fast though. I can't remember offhand how long the recordings are kept for. Scottish Centre should also have the data from the Manchester Approach radar, which they composite with the 2 radars already mentioned for use by the TMA sectors.
Safe flying as always.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 20:08
  #210 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: GLASGOW
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Removed. I did not read the previous post correctly.
maxred is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2013, 15:02
  #211 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In a hole somewhere
Age: 46
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nearly There
how likely do you think it is that you will get this information? (trace/mode c)
Quite likely I'd think, a similar thing happened to me a few years back doing a few orbits over the parents house on the Wirral, somebody on the ground decided I too was well below 500' and wrote letters, one to the flight school I hired from and one to LPL ATC. "serious breach of Rule 5" "having studied the ANO" "risking inocent lives on the ground with stupidity"
ATC investigated using mode c data and acoustic monitoring data and the lowest I went to was 596' AGL....

Then we can all feed someone some humble pie!
I was asked if I'd like to respond to the complainant, which I did thanking him for pointing out I can fly 96' lower next time, which I did.
Haha very good
Pilot.Lyons is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2013, 15:45
  #212 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DORSET
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Country is full of jobsworths with nothing better to do, then too pompous to admit it.
sharksandwich is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 07:17
  #213 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Spanner has decided that discretion is the better part of valour.
shakehandsman is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 08:20
  #214 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

I suspect Spanner is merely complying with a request from a moderator not to post again...


But it may be more sinister than that after all Spanner is clearly a blind, paranoid jobsworth, only fit to be ignored and/or ridiculed... .

FTAOD the sentence above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is not serious.

The irony of pillorying Spanner in this thread isn't lost on me.

Last edited by rustle; 17th Nov 2013 at 13:18.
rustle is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 08:37
  #215 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect Spanner is merely complying with a request from a moderator not to post again..
I do hope that isn't what has happened.

Whether you agree with what he wrote or not (I don't) and even if he has conducted the subsequent debate stupidly as I personally think he has, he should have the right to express his opinion, right or wrong.

If the mods think the thread has crossed the line, they can lock it as they have in many other cases.

My £.02
Jonzarno is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 09:04
  #216 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its more likely they have contacted the CAA and the enforcement branch have told them not to post any more public comment in case it effects there evidence in court.

Then of course if it proved that they were incorrect the Pilot can take them to court for deformation.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 10:09
  #217 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 72
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And once he is back in shape, he can go for defamation.
fujii is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 10:10
  #218 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the pilot should take him round the back for deformation Jock. The court might object to the violence.
Crash one is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 10:27
  #219 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DORSET
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jonzarno - the freedom to express an opinion is generally: " subject to certain restrictions" including " respect for the rights or reputation of others" (Art.19 HRA)
sharksandwich is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 10:59
  #220 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shark sandwich

Sorry, but that's a bit of a stretch. He has expressed an opinion: yes, he has done it badly and no, I for one don't agree with him, but he has broken no law.
Jonzarno is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.