Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

laa permit aircraft for tug use

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

laa permit aircraft for tug use

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2013, 14:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: wales uk
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
laa permit aircraft for tug use

Many thanks in advance to anyone taking the time to answer my questions and read my ramblings. Please assume I know nothing whatsoever about aircraft.
My son wants to be a commercial pilot and has done for years. He has put lots of effort into his dream gaining 5 gcse, 2 a level’s and is now in his final year of a science degree. He has also done about 30hrs in a motor glider with an instructor.
His instructor has now told me that he needs to progress onto a different aircraft as he has advanced beyond the motor glider, he suggested a euro fox, he also advised me that I should be looking for an LAA permit aircraft with a mogas engine as they are relatively cheap to run and maintain. The instructor’s airfield has planning restrictions limiting it to glider, motor glider and glider tug use, but we could store the aircraft in his hangar and use his runway if the aircraft complied with the restriction by having a tow hook.
I don’t have euro fox money and have struggled to raise £35k. this I hoped would get my son to ppl and then hour building towards cpl. My plan was to buy an aircraft, my son use it as long as he needed and then sell it to pay for the next step in his training.
I did think that a zenair ch 601 would be perfect until I found out the wings have failed in use on 7 occasions killing 11 people.
Are second hand LAA permit aircraft safe?
What do they cost to maintain?
I really don’t know what to do for the best and don’t have a clue what I should be looking for or doing in order to help the best I can. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
mydogsprat is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 15:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Delsey
Posts: 744
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
His instructor has now told me that he needs to progress onto a different aircraft as he has advanced beyond the motor glider, he suggested a euro fox, he also advised me that I should be looking for an LAA permit aircraft with a mogas engine as they are relatively cheap to run and maintain. The instructor’s airfield has planning restrictions limiting it to glider, motor glider and glider tug use, but we could store the aircraft in his hangar and use his runway if the aircraft complied with the restriction by having a tow hook.
Are you sure his instructor isn't simply after a new free tug and pilot? Buy him a share (c £5000) in a Cessna 150 or a PA28.
500 above is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 16:09
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: wales uk
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
100% sure that is not the case. his instructor runs a flight school with just a motor glider.
nearest airfield to us is 90mins by car other than this small one. son not old enough to drive.
mydogsprat is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 17:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would the eurofox be in the right weight category to count for hour building towards a CPL? Not sure under new EASA rules what goes for hour building towards CPL, just know that microlights don't count, you'd have to check up on the status of the eurofox.

You say you want to buy it, operate it so he can build his hours then sell it to fund the remainder of the training. You won't be making any money on it, so why not just spend the money on training at a proper school like everyone else does, rather than investing all your capital into an aircraft where it will be tied up if you are unable to sell it at the end. Aircraft ownership is very expensive, and an aircraft sitting in the hangar isn't doing anyone any favours. The best rate will be at a busy FTO where the aircraft are flown almost as much as possible, and if it breaks down for any reason there will be another one parked right next to it also owned by the FTO which you can take on. What happens when you get a prop strike or someone cooks the cylinders while tugging? who's paying for the new engine?
RTN11 is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 18:36
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: wales uk
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not going to be used for tugging, it needs to be able to tow in order to comply with a planning restriction on the airfield. this airfield would be very cheap, very close and my sons instructor will be onsite.
i am told that i can run an aircraft in this category for about £35 hour wet, buy one for about £20k and sell a year later for a small loss.
i am also told that if my son is the sole owner he can use it for his training.
mydogsprat is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 18:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever the outcome, your supportive attitude is a pleasure to read.

I'm with the others though, buy him a share or rent for the hour building. Sole ownership is a very expensive way to do it and fraught with risk. It will cost you a fortune to keep the asset airworthy and could be scary money when it has some kind of mechanical failure, which may not even be your son's fault.

I run a six person group so am very in touch with our expenses and accounting.
jollyrog is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 18:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He must be old enough to drive if he's done A levels and is in a degree. Spend some of the saved money on driving lessons and a car for him, let him drive the 90 minutes.
jollyrog is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 19:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: London
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many hours has your son accumulated so far?

I'm sure the British Microlight Association (BMAA.org) still run sponsorship. You and your son, working hard as you are, may be able to get a microlight scholarship.
HWEST is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 19:29
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: wales uk
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no he is not old enough to drive.

he has done 40hrs in a motor glider and 6 in a cessna 172. he has however only been able to log 9 of them due to age.
mydogsprat is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 20:11
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: wales uk
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To clarify the situation a bit.
I have been told he needs a further 36 hrs for his ppl @ £200 per hour at the closest airfield offering flight training which is 90mins each way by car. Then another 100hrs @£114 per hour towards his cpl. Or £18400 total.
His instructor has recommended he buys a ” light sport aircraft.” I have found them with about 200 hrs on them for around £20k his instructor says that you can run them for around £35hr wet and would charge £30 hr for his training. He also says that we would lose very little reselling it maybe £2-£3k. So 36 hrs @ £65 then 100 hrs @35 is a total of £5840 + depreciation is still half the price (if nothing goes badly wrong)
I don’t know enough to decide if this is a good idea, or how safe these “light sport aircraft” are as most of them were sold as kits. I also feel it would be an advantage for my son to be able to fly whenever he likes/can.
Would a share in something work out cheaper? Would he be able to use an aircraft he had a share in for his ppl training? I am told things like Cessna 150 ect are now thought of as “old iron” and are rotting on airfields in droves because they cost so much to run, is this true?
Thanks to all so far that have taken the time to respond. As you can see I have limited knowledge of all things aviation.
mydogsprat is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 20:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, the Eurofox is a lousy tug. It can't handle the heavier two seat trainers, especially with no wind and wet grass. Although the impression you give is that it would not be used for tugging, but just converted so it could tug to satisfy some arbitrary requirement at your airfield.

Sounds like your son is looking to get a CPL, he would need an EASA PPL would would need to be done in an EASA aircraft, which the Eurofox certainly isn't.

If he was looking to train for an LAPL in the Eurofox, be very careful, as any down time of the aircraft can seriously hold up flight training wasting more money, time and effort.

I really do not want to crush your enthusiasm, I just think you need to explore a different route, and that this instructor may have been looking for someone to get a new tug for the gliding strip so has fed you the lines that are best for him rather than best for your son.
RTN11 is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 20:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Age: 39
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are at Lleweni Parc in North Wales as I suspect, (with Denbigh flight training) the words "barge pole" and "wouldn't touch with" immediately come to mind. This is with first hand experience of the place.

I echo the advise you have been given by other forum members, just bite the bullet and go to a training school/club.
FoxtrotLimaYankee is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 23:22
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Farningham
Age: 80
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your son is training at a Gliding site ?
Does he fly Gliders ?
If not ? Why not?
With a BGA Glider Pilot Licence ( Bronze With X/C endorsement) already has enough hrs to convert to a NPPL.

Has he had a CAA medical ?
There's no point spending money unless a Class 1 can be acheived.

I think you need to do more research into how he could achieve his ambition at minimum cost.

When he's finished his Degree and worked hard to get top grade why not try to get an Airline to sponsor.

You never Know there maybe a place for him !
Oldbiggincfi is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2013, 23:31
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: wales uk
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
many thanks indeed for all the info. you have all cleared things up a bit for me and things are starting to make sense.
the info i had prior to starting this thread was clearly a dead horse and i shall stop flogging it.

Your son is training at a Gliding site ?
yes
Does he fly Gliders ?
motor glider
If not ? Why not?
With a BGA Glider Pilot Licence ( Bronze With X/C endorsement) already has enough hrs to convert to a NPPL.
thanks for the info
Has he had a CAA medical ?
no
There's no point spending money unless a Class 1 can be acheived.
i will look into it asap, thanks.
I think you need to do more research into how he could achieve his ambition at minimum cost.
doing that now, started this thread to pick all of your brains.
When he's finished his Degree and worked hard to get top grade
predicted 2.1
why not try to get an Airline to sponsor.
or he could learn to ride one of the many pigs that passes overhead
You never Know there maybe a place for him !
mydogsprat is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2013, 10:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Norfolk, England
Age: 58
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are talking serious amounts of money, so I'd carry on putting serious amounts of thought into this!

How old is your son? Any hours logged from age 14 can count towards both his PPL and CPL.
He can use 30 hours flying motor gliders to count toward his CPL. An NPPL SLMG converted to PPL would probably be his easiest route to a PPL with his present experience, so there's little point in changing to SEP until he gets that.
Once he has his NPPL SLMG he could convert easily with a few hours at a reputable flying school flying EASA SEP as he will need (for want of a better phrase) Group A SEP hours, not microlight ones to credit towards his CPL.
It's not really worth him buying a permit aircraft until he gets his PPL as it's a mire of regulation about where, who by, and what he can train in to get an EASA SEP PPL (which is what he will need). Yes he could train in his own aircraft, but with what experience he has, he's close enough to get the PPL easily without the confusion of regulations ect.
Once he has his PPL, an LAA permit aeroplane is a good way to go for hour building. For cheapness (and IMHO reliability and safety) buy something like a Jodel or other well proven design (maybe single seater for really cheap) rather than a more modern kit build. They may be older, but they will be well proven and fly safely. If hangarage is a problem go for something with folding wings (some may scoff, but look up Clutton FRED to get an idea of what I mean).
People will come along and say it's not the "right" kind of flying to lead to a CPL, but I would argue that a wide variety of flying is just what a CPL should have! If he's serious, a cheap single seat PFA type is perfect for hour building. A relatively fast one would probably be best (ok, not a FRED lol) as he will need at least one long cross country (ideally several) under his belt for a CPL.
What his instructor suggests has some merit, but like others have said ... It sounds like some self interest is creeping in there! I certainly would not recommend what he/she is suggesting.

Be careful what you decide!

Good luck to him, SS
shortstripper is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2013, 12:12
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hampshire, UK
Age: 72
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He has put lots of effort into his dream gaining 5 gcse, 2 a level’s and is now in his final year of a science degree.
son not old enough to drive.
no he is not old enough to drive.
So he's not yet 17 years old, but has almost finished a science degree.

Right ....

SlipSlider is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2013, 12:39
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: wales uk
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So he's not yet 17 years old, but has almost finished a science degree.

Right ....

correct.

Last edited by mydogsprat; 28th Jul 2013 at 12:48.
mydogsprat is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2013, 13:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Delsey
Posts: 744
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
100% sure that is not the case. his instructor runs a flight school with just a motor glider.
I wouldn't be so sure, but maybe I'm cynical having been in the industry for a while. Has the instructor suggested that he 'looks after' or 'manages' the aircraft? Perhaps he has stated that he could utilise the aircraft a bit to 'mitigate' costs...?

What his instructor suggests has some merit, but like others have said ... It sounds like some self interest is creeping in there! I certainly would not recommend what he/she is suggesting.
Absolutely!

Sounds like your son is looking to get a CPL, he would need an EASA PPL would would need to be done in an EASA aircraft, which the Eurofox certainly isn't.
You need to look into this. Don't take a (possibly impartial?) glider instructors word for it. The poster is absolutely correct. Your son needs an EASA PPL(A), remember.

Would a share in something work out cheaper? Would he be able to use an aircraft he had a share in for his ppl training? I am told things like Cessna 150 ect are now thought of as “old iron” and are rotting on airfields in droves because they cost so much to run, is this true?
I'd strongly suggest he joins a small (4 person) group on an aircraft which is capable/legal for night flight for the night qualification, flight in IMC for the IR(R) and obviously for the PPL(A). This is indeed possible.

With a small group with the right members (weekend flyers etc) he would have most of the week to train for the above. Larger groups may pose a problem on more than one front. Seek impartial advice! The benefit of doing the above with a share in an aircraft based at an airfield/airport that offers decent commercial training is that he would already be familiar with that airports procedures and airspace. On saying that, I 'grew up' flying Luscombe's, Condors and a Chipmunk in and out of many short farm strips for fun. Flying from a controlled field in his early stages can also promote discipline in R/T etc. All of this can be learnt under any decent instructor from any sort of airfield/airport, however.

Last edited by 500 above; 28th Jul 2013 at 13:28.
500 above is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2013, 14:17
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ 500 above offers a lot of good advice, there.
I know of one PPL who had a nominal share in an AERONCA (1950's fabric covered, swing the prop to start AKA "Armstrong" starting

a very cheap PPL by comparison with "spam-can" rental....BUT AFAIK, due to all the regulatory changes, you won't be allowed to do an EASA PPL on a Permit aircraft (which I think is classified as "Annex 2" ....in plain english, it's a UK only , unless permission is sought from another country, to use it in their airspace.)...also, though a 2-seater and enormous fun, it was as slow as hell and guzzled AVGAS which is far more expensive than pump petrol, AKA MOGAS.
Permit aircraft, you can maintain yourself...a major cost-consideration other than Hangarage and insurance...not much use if you're not a spannerman.
A look on "Flyer" forum could be of benefit, several of the regulars here, also contribute over there!
I'm sure someone will be along to correct me shortly!...what I DO know ,is there is a directive from Cessna, to do a lot of inspection and replacement work on their ancient Spamcans (150/152/172 are the majority of cessna flying-school trainers) this means a lot will be , as you surmised, "beyond economic repair" SO BEWARE CHEAP CESSNA DEALS where the SID's have not been complied with.!!!!

If your son is going to fly and hours-build intensively, then ownership *could* make sense, but he'd need to do around 100 hours a year to make it worthwhile.
Why does everyone assume he needs a car to get to the nearest "proper" airfield?....motorbike/scooter would teach him more roadcraft than all the "learn to pass your test" driving schools combined.....a compromise would be the odd BMW fully-faired "scooter "- effectively a 2-wheel microcar with no sides!
Alternatively, there's stuff such as the AIXAM and Ligier which is a tiny car legally a quadricycle....slow, but enclosed and ultra cheap on tax / insurance and fuel...drive them on a motorcycle license.

Browse this forum and you'll soon pick up the jargon and get a feel for the nature of Aviation....see the LAA website for information about Permit aircraft and their relevance to EASA (which, it appears, is now the universal diktat of all things Aviation in Europe)
To just fly, Microlights *can* be ,at first viewing, *normal* light aircraft, but a reduction in engine-size and / or increase in wing-area makes for the reclassification. British Microlight Association website

My personal take on it , - the less regulated by EASA the more restrictive the usage and the more limited the class-specific license.

IF you browse the forums, you'll pick up an essential piece of advice
"NEVER PAY A LARGE SUM UP FRONT TO A TRAINING-ORGANISATION.

They go bust with monotonous regularity, taking all the prepaid dosh with them.

Sorry, long post, but so much ground to cover!
cockney steve is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2013, 15:15
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 85
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having owned a few aircraft myself I would strongly recommend sharing ownership. Life looking after an aircraft can be worrying at times, it is wonderful to have someone else to bounce concerns and ideas off of.
Owning on your own can be a lonely experience.
funfly is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.