Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

[FAA]Commercial Pilot without instrument rating

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

[FAA]Commercial Pilot without instrument rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jul 2013, 04:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: seoul
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[FAA]Commercial Pilot without instrument rating

Hello folks.

I know that the carriage of passengers for hire on cross-country flights in excess of 50 nautical miles or at night is prohibited.

But does it actually says that on the limitation portion of certificate?

14 CFR 61.133 says

"(b) Limitations. (1) A person who applies for a commercial pilot certificate with an airplane category or powered-lift category rating and does not hold an instrument rating in the same category and class will be issued a commercial pilot certificate that contains the limitation, “The carriage of passengers for hire in (airplanes) (powered-lifts) on cross-country flights in excess of 50 nautical miles or at night is prohibited.” The limitation may be removed when the person satisfactorily accomplishes the requirements listed in § 61.65 of this part for an instrument rating in the same category and class of aircraft listed on the person's commercial pilot certificate."

Last edited by FLYABLE; 17th Jul 2013 at 05:04. Reason: added some BB codes
FLYABLE is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2013, 07:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No you just follow the rules like everyone else

And no there is nothing stamped on your license
Scottish.CPL is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2013, 11:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This commercial pilot without an IR rating issue came up recently when i was in ground school for my FAA IR written, I asked the instructor why on earth would someone go to the trouble of getting a commercial rating without getting an IR, he said it was kind of crazy as he doubted that an insurance policy would be written for a commercial operation using non instrument rated pilots.

I have read on the ntsb air crash investigations site where a non IR guy in a twin Cessna in Texas killed himself and his fee paying passengers when he ran into trouble that would probably not have been an issue if held a current IR. I think it is a pretty bull**** deal that the FAA allows this as the average member of the public with little or no aviation knowledge would have a reasonable and legitimate expectation that the air taxi/charter flight they are climbing aboard is piloted by someone competent enough to handle routine weather and visibility deficiencies.

I would be really pissed off if I was a paying passenger and some ******** in the left seat announced during the flight that he held basically a VFR ticket with a few bells and whistles that taught him how to fly to stricter tolerances but we were SOL if we ran into weather. Its kind of like jumping in a taxi and finding out the drivers only got a moped licence and training.
piperboy84 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2013, 16:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Crop Dusters, banner and glider tow, meat bomb drivers, none of them should ever get near a cloud in the course of their work.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2013, 16:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ones above do not routinely carry pax. To me it looks like it was designed to allow pleasure flying - why would you need an IR for that, the 50 mile limit makes sense then.

Last edited by foxmoth; 17th Jul 2013 at 16:47.
foxmoth is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2013, 07:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aerial photography; Aerial baptism; Reconnaissance and Observation;
Oh and flight instructing, right ? All of these can be ways to get your hours from 250 to 1500, and I know a few people who were above the 400 hour mark when they started on their IR.

The fact that you are a commercial pilot also assumes that your knowledge of weather is better.

No-one would hire you for any kind of corporate charter flying, even if it is just for hopping across the Mississippi River. And an air taxi requires rather more than a commercial pilot to get an operators license.

I fail to see the problem here. In Europe we think we need to regulate and restrict everything. The result is a diarrhea of legislation, general confusion, sloppy compliance (flown in Spain recently ? How about Slovenia then ?) and an overall diminished business friendlyness that will cost us dearly.
proudprivate is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2013, 10:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 1,092
Received 77 Likes on 55 Posts
Also used for sightseeing flights, which don't happen in poor weather.
You do need your instrument rating prior to earning the instructor rating, except in gliders.
Bryan

Last edited by IFMU; 18th Jul 2013 at 10:31.
IFMU is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.