Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Questions for an Old, Bold Pilot...

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Questions for an Old, Bold Pilot...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Nov 2012, 20:03
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just to make sure you understand, use the POH section on SHORT FIELD LANDINGS (not over an obstacle or over an obstacle as you choose).

ALSO: if you haven't read "stick and rudder" by langweische, you are missing out on great advice on landings...in particular the method he calls the stall down landing, in which you start to reduce your speed prior tot he runway...be sure to read it and understand it before you try it.

Last edited by sevenstrokeroll; 5th Nov 2012 at 20:39.
sevenstrokeroll is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 07:21
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Unna, Germany
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sevenstrokeroll wrote
point one: if you are flying at 6000' you are flying at an IFR altitude...shouldn't you be VFR at 6500' feet? (assuming youare above 3000 agl)
That is how I learnt it in Germany, however in UK they use - I believe - the quadrant rule. Means magnetic track 0 - 89 - odd thousands. MT 90 - 179 odd thousands plus 500, MT 180 - 269 Even thousands and 270 - 359 even thousands plus 500 - at least that's what it says in my 2012 Jeppesen EG5 Chart....
Steve6443 is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 08:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The quadrantal rule is an IFR procedure flown on standard pressure and not a VFR procedure! There is nothing to stop you flying QNH OCAS VFR at 6000 feet

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 10:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Unna, Germany
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The quadrantal rule is an IFR procedure flown on standard pressure and not a VFR procedure! There is nothing to stop you flying QNH OCAS VFR at 6000 feet
Not wishing to step on your toes, but why does the reverse side of the Geppesen VFR Chart 2012 (EG5) say:

United Kingdom

VFR Cruising Levels

Flight Levels below 19500

Magnetic Track Cruising Level in Feet
000 - 089 odd thousands
090 - 179 odd thousands plus 500
180 - 269 even thousands
270 - 359 even thousands plus 500

Am I missing something? In spring I wanted to do a tour of UK, so this is something I would like to clarify.....

Last edited by Steve6443; 6th Nov 2012 at 10:23.
Steve6443 is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 10:26
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve its change I belive with the EASA stuff thats come in. So the quad rule is no more its the same as everywhere else


Jepp is pretty crap for use in the UK your alot better using the CAA charts. Either scale will do depending how much detail you want.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 10:54
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve

If that is the case its a nonsense! As a VFR pilot you are not expected to fly IFR tolerances so how they expect you to fly tolerances makes no sense?
It was always the case that the quadrantle rule was for IFR flight in the UK OCAS But that was not the case for VFR.
But I am happy to be corrected

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 11:23
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve its change I belive with the EASA stuff thats come in. So the quad rule is no more its the same as everywhere else
Is this actually with us now? I am confused with all the different and constantly changing dates.

D.O.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 12:03
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve,

The Quadrangle rule in the UK was compulsory for IFR and recommended but not compulsory for VFR (and as far as I can see almost universally ignored for VFR).

The UK is transitioning to ICAO standard semi circular rule for this. I'm not sure if this happened in September or happening in December, but either way it will be in play before your trip in spring, so you must operate according to the semi-circular rule that you are familair with and which operates in the rest of Europe.

dp
dublinpilot is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 13:00
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK, mainly
Age: 39
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The UK CAA are delaying the transition to Part-SERA until 4 December 2014 - see here. Perhaps something has been learnt from the Part-FCL debacle?
madlandrover is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 17:13
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quadrangle
Quadrantle
It's Quadrantal Goddammit......!

Makes a change from Biannual/biennial/Stansted/Stanstead.etc.

Oh alright then. God damn it.

Last edited by flybymike; 6th Nov 2012 at 17:18.
flybymike is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 17:49
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah well....it's not natural languange, but one forced on my by 700 years of oppression by an evil British empire So why not abuse it
dublinpilot is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 20:06
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
(and as far as I can see almost universally ignored for VFR)
It's clearly useless to someone who wants to fly in the natural place, ie as high as possible but below the cloud base.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 22:32
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(and as far as I can see almost universally ignored for VFR)
It's clearly useless to someone who wants to fly in the natural place, ie as high as possible but below the cloud base.
Also a bit of a challenge for someone who wishes to do aerobatics above 3000 feet.
flybymike is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.