Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Buying a light aircraft

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Buying a light aircraft

Old 3rd Sep 2012, 20:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lechlade, Glos.UK
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Buying a light aircraft

Buying a light aeroplane is a doggy business. Buy an old one and it is just the same as buying an old house or car. But a 'proper' aeroplane is expensive. So how about a VLA (Very Light Aircraft). But which one? It must be economical to run, use half the fuel consumption of a Bulldog, have a range of over 500 nm, cruise at least 110 - 120 kts, carry two + bags, cost not much more than £130K, low wing; so which one:

Aquila
Sting
Breezer
Sportstar
Sport Crusier

?????????
sharpend is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 05:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They all have there problems, the ultra light build that is required has made these aircraft a bit fragile and even new aircraft are starting to exhibit problems.

In the hands of a careful owner the problems can be contained, group owned aircraft are another thing !

Take someone who has maintained these aircraft along with you to inspect any aircraft you are considering buying...........it won't be long before you find out why the Cessna 152 is still the preferred option for a club trainer.
A and C is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 07:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: U.K.
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:Jodel 120/117. Load 600lbs, 19ltrs/hr, 100kts, range 500nm £12k.
Croqueteer is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 07:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Worcs/Glos border
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
His budget is £130k, not £13k.

Dream on...
Humaround is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 08:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is your intended requirement? I started off with this;

120k min
Mogas
Two adults 40lb fuel and 4 hours fuel min
Derig easily
Etc.

How heavy are you? I am over 90kg and this ruled out several aircraft. Have you flown in Rotax powered machines before? If not I would be happy to take you up for a ride round and discuss maintenance etc (midlands based) – I have looked after my home built VLA for the last 8 years or so.

Compare wing loading. Some of the aircraft you have on the list have very light wing loading, others less so. This has a huge impact on the ride quality in turbulence.

Do not be put off by the “VLA is too light” argument – a C150 would fall into the VLA cat and some VLA aircraft are now over 15 years old and have well over 7000 hours in club use in Europe. Vital to find someone who understands the aircraft – particularly the Rotax, which is superb if looked after right but a complete nail if not.

Good luck,
Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 08:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,350
Received 70 Likes on 30 Posts
This would be my choice...



Sport Cruiser

Pretty much fits the spec and within budget.
ETOPS is online now  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 08:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the mission profile? VFR/IFR / UK / Euro touring?

500nm usable range means a zero fuel range of a lot more than 500nm.
peterh337 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 08:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kent
Age: 61
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many times I have been told:
If it Flies, Floats or F*@#s
Then it's cheaper to rent by the hour
Of course I ignored the wisdom of my elders and, many years on, having (part) owned a boat and a couple of aeroplanes I an confirm the first 2 are true.

Wanting to continue in my current wedded bliss I won't comment on the 3rd one.

OC619
OpenCirrus619 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 08:42
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lechlade, Glos.UK
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Sportcruiser??? Are they not a bit fragile around the nose leg area?

As for the rest, I am 90 kgs clothed and some of my passengers are also. I will mainly fly UK/Northern France. Occasional IMC (yes I know most are prohibited). Yes, I accept hire is cheaper. Range should be at least 500 nm with reserves. Build quality and robustness are important. As is stability in turbulence.

Thinking at present, Aquila or Breezer. Presently fly Cirrus (group) & Bulldog (hire). Aeroplane mainly for me and I have over 10000 hrs.

Oh & I would like to operate off grass... not something a Cirrus is good at!

Last edited by sharpend; 4th Sep 2012 at 08:43.
sharpend is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 08:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire
Age: 48
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Humaround
His budget is £130k, not £13k.

Dream on...
I think that is exactly the point that Croqueteer was making. Sharpend could get an aircraft that meets all his requirements at 10% of the cost.
stevelup is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 09:37
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it Flies, Floats or F*@#s
Then it's cheaper to rent by the hour
Only if you don't care who else has been messing with it (her)

I would not get into most rental hardware if you paid me for it (seriously).

Probably OK for going from Shoreham to Goodwood, if keeping well away from the sea

If you want the highest level of maintenance, safety, convenience, access for long trips (and without the occassional long trips, you will get bored soon enough) then ownership outright, or in a small syndicate of well matched people, is the only way. N-reg is even better.

Sharpend could get an aircraft that meets all his requirements at 10% of the cost.
Only if he is happy to fly junk.

Last edited by peterh337; 4th Sep 2012 at 09:37.
peterh337 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 10:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Midlands
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
''Sportcruiser??? Are they not a bit fragile around the nose leg area?''

Yes it is true that there have been some issues with the early type of noseleg, particulary where it is a group owned aircraft and groupies don't know how to land it properly.
Mine is an original leg operating off a roughish strip and it has been fine in 150hours.

All aircraft have issues and foibles that you will have to live with that are peculiar to that aircraft. The perfect aircraft has yet to be made!...and they are always a compromise between performance and carrying capacity and STOL, plus a multitude of other things.

Question:- Are you looking for a LAA machine, to build and maintain it yourself? or do you want to hand it over to someone and then pay the bill at the end?..EASA regime.

Aquila comes under EASA so can't build or maintain yourself, so does a Breezer.
Sportstar, if its the Max (MAUW 600kg) then you will again be under EASA. LAA if the lighter version so you can build/maintain yourself.

A new option that is just coming on to the UK scene and was at the LAA rally at the weekend.....The Bristell. Definitely worth a look and once again a LAA machine in the Sportcruiser mould (same designer)that will be approved in the next 12months or so.
Shoestring Flyer is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 10:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire
Age: 48
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by peterh337
Only if he is happy to fly junk.
Rubbish. I'd much rather fly a 40 year old well cared for Jodel than a flimsy VLA.
stevelup is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 10:18
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FMMI
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Besides the cost and cruising performance, please go ahead and sit in all of your contenders.

You'll find out that there is a huge difference in all the aircraft you are naming. I have experience with a DA(V)-20, P2002 and the Aquila. The specs may seem comparable, but the space you have in an Aquila is just incomparable with a Katana. Aquila is also blessed with German build quality and if you compare that to a Tecnam and money is no issue, you'll end up buying the Aquila.

In the end they all perform about the same, the 10 knots difference is not worth choosing one over the other.

For example a 400 NM trip with 110 kts cruise: 3 hours 20 min.
120 kts cruise over same distance: 3 hours 37 min.

Those 17 minutes are in my opinion not worth choosing one over the other.

Look at:
-reliability (maintenance/Rotax)
-space inside the aircraft and comfort (as mentioned wing loading)
-build quality

Just a note, all the aircraft you are looking at are certified in the CS-VLA category. That means that IFR flying is never possible, because the certification standard does not allow that.
Immortal is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 10:28
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel economy is an interesting thing, my Cub with it's C90 engine drinks a little under 18ltrs mogas an hour. I have a friend with an RV4 which is probably about 28 litres AVGAS an hour but I get 75 kts and he gets 160kts. So per hour I'm cheaper but distance wise he's significantly less expensive.

VLAs as far as I'm aware none of them are cleared for IFR flight and I have to say I wouldn't want to either they bounce around a bit in fairly smooth conditions.

That said, the LAA is well under way for getting appropriately equipped aircraft certified to fly IMC/IFR. So you should not be turned off too much by LAA aircraft so long as they have the gear, not sure how long it will take but it will happen.

Suggestions for consideration, with a budget of £130k you have a lot of options.
1. It should be easily resold, nothing worse than having a rare non desirable aircraft, so be warned - if you decide to sell it on and chose something rare you will find difficulty selling it on.
2. Spares, it should be easy and not too expensive to find spares. For instance the TB20 you can find spares for but they're rarely cheap, the TB10 is a different matter entirely. Cessnas and Pipers are much easier but anything with a CofA requires a form 1 along with it, it translates to a great deal more expense for a piece of paper.
3. It should not prevent you from landing at almost any airfield you want, so if you need something that does grass, get something that's good on grass. It might mean high wing.

With your budget in mind, if it was me buying the aircraft.
Vans RV8/RV7, the tailwheel version. Imports can be total garbage but the UK home built ones tend to be very good, even if they aren't they'll provide good economy for range and are likely to be well equipped for IFR flight, if not you can use the £50k you'll have left over to equip for IF.
All of the RVs are fast up to about 200mph, many of them can/do run on MOGAS. I don't like the nosewheel ones but without any real justification.

Carbon Cub SS. Probably not as fast as you're looking for but well equipped, on an EASA Permit ready to fly, it's new and a seriously good bit of kit. I want one to the core of my bones . There is no airfield in the UK that would be difficult to get into.

Super Decathlon, or one of the other ACA aircraft. Fast enough, economy isn't quite what you want but will be certified for IFR and you can buy new with your budget. Very comfortable tourer lots of space, lots of useful load and should provide you with the range you desire. I've flown a couple of these and like them a lot.

Cessna 182 Q (or later) or RG, you probably wont like the thirst of this machine but it will get you in anywhere and is plenty quick enough, there are N reg ones around that come with long range tanks, have plenty of bells and whistles, are certified for IFR are popular enough to resell and parts are easily attained.

TB20, plenty around to buy, very fast, parts can be pricey and a pain to get but for touring, my belief is that there is nothing more comfortable. You wont get mogas in it Also fairly thirsty but again, speed provides the economy.

The Sportcruiser is nice, the noseleg is weak and my understanding is from a reliable source that after a couple of replacement noselegs, other stuff starts to warp and bend. Care is required on landing.

Still a Vans will do all you expect and significantly more, an RV 7 with a 180hp engine would do what you want and you'll have plently left over to cover the costs of more fuel used per hour - also the maintenance will be significantly cheaper. That's what I'd have
Dan the weegie is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 10:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a note, all the aircraft you are looking at are certified in the CS-VLA category. That means that IFR flying is never possible, because the certification standard does not allow that.
Yes, absurdly enough an LAA with the right equipment will have more privileges than a CS-VLA - in the UK only I would imagine.
Dan the weegie is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 10:57
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LAAs can't fly abroad, well not without hassle, except where there are reciprocals.

That's why I asked about the mission profile.

Going abroad (easily) is a huge massive plus in making and keeping flying interesting in the long term.

TB20, plenty around to buy, very fast, parts can be pricey and a pain to get but for touring, my belief is that there is nothing more comfortable. You wont get mogas in it Also fairly thirsty but again, speed provides the economy.
I wasn't going to mention the TB20 because the OP's original list suggested he was looking totally elsewhere, but that's not actually true about parts or economy. It is common pilot forum stuff though....

Parts are as pricey as all certified-aircraft parts, but are easy to get. And very few parts have to come from the airframe manufacturer (ask anybody with a Commander etc etc).

In long range cruise I get 140kt TAS at FL100, burning about 9.5USG/hr (36 litres/hr).

At low level, say 3000ft and not particular after economy, I burn 11.3USG/hr for 138kt IAS.

Unbeatable for touring, in the SEP class, while retaining the ability to do local hacking. Loads of planes are better for long range touring (PA46 comes to mind, if you watch the engine "rather carefully" ) but are no good for local UK hacking around. And, yeah, you could pick up a PA46 for £130k, too, with, ahem, a few, ahem, outstanding ADs.... there is a "bit" of a learning curve in the ownership game.

The 1300nm+ range is fantastic. It makes even trips around Greece (I am off there shortly) doable; the customs/avgas matrix in Italy and Greece etc would be a logistical nightmare (for a non perpetually retired pilot) in a plane whose range is actually 500nm. In fact 500nm is no good except for local hacking around the southern UK, by the time you factor in decent reserves to a weather diversion (diverting from Shoreham to Goodwood or vice versa doesn't really cut the mustard and diverting from Shoreham to Lydd only begins to cut the mustard if you can actually, never mind legally, fly the ILS).

That's why I asked about the mission profile

£130k might just maybe get you a nice 2002 TB20GT; one of the last ones made like mine



I have a friend with an RV4 which is probably about 28 litres AVGAS an hour but I get 75 kts and he gets 160kts
He actually gets 160kt (IAS or TAS?) at 28 litres/hr?

Last edited by peterh337; 4th Sep 2012 at 11:04.
peterh337 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 11:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My first share was a TB9, parts were a nightmare to get at a sensible price and known a few TB10s but thus is the hassle of group ownership, if it had been solo then perhaps I'd have been less bothered.

Looks lovely by the way, I love the TB20 comfy, spacious, fast .

There's reciprocals now with many local EU countries for LAA, certainly France and Ireland which meets the mission.

Yes, he actually gets that, he has a a fairly coarse pitch prop on a 160 Lycoming and that's IAS at 2000ft on a 20C day in normal UK conditions, it takes another 40yds to get off the ground but has to keep it at around 2100 RPM to keep it under Vne take off is still very short. a VP prop might be better suited but more expensive to run. It's a very capable machine which is in my opinion what makes this an ideal fit for the OPs requirements.

Last edited by Dan the weegie; 4th Sep 2012 at 11:09.
Dan the weegie is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 11:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting why TB9/10 parts were hard to get. That is not current or recent experience. However there are some dumb maintenance shops who might order say an air filter from Socata when actually it is a £10 Brackett item from any old aviation parts shop and is used all over the GA scene. Socata don't help, by allocating their Z00... part numbers to everything in the IPC, so a bit of a brain is needed, not to mention a desire to not rip off the punter.

The TB9/10 is not such a good choice. They are basically much more comfy versions of the PA28 140/160, but few are in a good condition now because their sales were poor after the early 1980s (due to overpricing). Anyway the OP's £130k budget means he doesn't have to look there.

A quick google on the RV4 fuel flow suggests that your friend is getting about 10% over book figures, perhaps due to the prop.

But the RV4 is a tiny cockpit - 2-up tandem. Again, one needs to be sure that this meets the requirements. It's not suitable for holiday trips, carrying the usual stuff as well as a life raft, oxygen, etc. And crucially few women will want to go anywhere in that way

Last edited by peterh337; 4th Sep 2012 at 11:28.
peterh337 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2012, 11:42
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And crucially few women will want to go anywhere in that way
Some might say that's a bonus. My wife for instance has absolutely no desire to go flying in any aircraft, she just doesn't get it . Going on expensive holidays on the other hand - that's more like it .

The RV7 is a better machine for the profile roomy enough plenty of load space. The 4 is just for fun and for people who like flying on their own .

The RV8 is a big RV4, and truly only for the people who want a tandem machine. That's what I would want, I like Tandem. Side by side is for work .

On the Socata parts, I think you probably hit the nail on the head with regard to the maint shop but that's not something I would discuss in an open forum when folk know who I am
Dan the weegie is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.