Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Mid-air collision over Colorado

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Mid-air collision over Colorado

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Feb 2010, 23:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,561
Received 41 Likes on 20 Posts
I'm sure someone could come up with a small, lightweight, low power transponder for gliders IF it wasn't for bureaucracy.....Or how about mandate Mode S & ADS-B for us power lots, and mandate that gliders carry passive traffic systems to detect us
They have -- it's called FLARM. There's also PowerFLARM which will alert to Mode S and C transponders -- and there's PCAS which alerts to Mode C.

I suspect that for the price of not very many annual Mode C/S altitude calibration checks, light aircraft could install FLARM and get alerts.
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 00:27
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kelowna Wine Country
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 11 Posts
While we all discussing whether the glider should have,/could have a transponder fitted we're missing the point that the Pawnee could have. So far any discussion about warning equipment is just speculation as far as this case goes, it will only be valuable if it spurs someone to come up with a useful solution and the most obvious is mandatory expensive equipment. Unfortunately when governments mandate such things they tend to do so universally which will be a pity for those of us who fly in less crowded airspace.
ChrisVJ is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 00:58
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 280
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe this accident shows just how useless a BRS parachute recovery system is. The Cirrus crew were not saved by it, despite the aircraft appearing to be mostly intact during final descent. In fact, it appears that due to the slow and almost vertical descent, the aircraft cockpit was exposed to fire and smoke throughout the descent. It is impossible to know if the aircraft was flyable after the collision, but as most of the smoke is seen coming from the engine, maybe it might have been. In that case a controlled, steep, side slipping descent might have kept them alive.The BRS took that option away. You are a passenger once it is deployed.
777fly is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 02:03
  #24 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is an odd view that says the addition of a BRS takes AWAY options??? I guess it is pretty tricky to remain controlled if a wing is missing....If anything it added one option....the option not to plummet to the ground. It looks like terrible luck, that the brs works just fine, but the fire killed them...horrible way to go, poor buggers. But you could equally blame the avgas for being too flammable or the engine for being hot, or the fuel tanks for holding too much fuel....

But at the end of the day, had they not been in the same place at the same time, it would never have happened.. I'd rather have the option of a brs if I were in their position.....
englishal is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 06:38
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To complete the quote from the UK airpox board, with an added 'Smile':

Lessons Identified | UK Airprox Board

"About 10% of all Airprox are glider-related – that’s about 20 incidents a year. Almost all occur in Class G airspace which is of course for everyone to use. In such airspace, “see and avoid” is the primary means of collision avoidance. Modern gliders can be very difficult to see so a better understanding of where gliders may be found should assist everyone to choose routes and levels that minimise the chances of an encounter. The Airprox Board’s gliding specialist offers the following advice to pilots, drawn from Airprox.

Glider sites are clearly marked on the topographical charts but be careful with some versions - and particularly electronic charts - as not all publishers have included them yet. Note that the heights shown on the charts refer to the maximum height of a winch launch. On CAA charts these are shown nowadays as the altitude above sea level (QNH). If height above the site (QFE) is used, either on older CAA charts or on your non-CAA chart, then note that most gliding sites specify a maximum winch launch height of either 2000ft or 3000ft above ground level. Several sites are perched on tops of hills so a glider’s altitude (QNH) at the top of a winch launch could be 4000ft if the site is 1000ft above sea level.
Avoiding the winch launch area is essential as the wire will certainly cause structural damage and probably remove a wing with fatal consequences, irrespective of aircraft size. But j
ust avoiding the winch height/altitude by a margin may not be sufficient to avoid a close encounter as several gliders may well be in the area having been launched earlier. The airspace above the winch launch may also be full of gliders. In addition, many of the sites will use aircraft to launch, typically anywhere between 2000ft and 4000ft above the site and occasionally higher.
The best advice is therefore to avoid a glider site by a good margin if at all possible, paying particular attention to the areas immediately above and upwind of the site. Most summer operations can be assumed to be up to cloudbase but well above it when wave conditions prevail. Wave can occur at any time but is generally more active during winter months, particularly at those sites that are nearer hill and mountain ranges.
If you find yourself approaching a glider launch site, do not rely on the launch crew seeing you in time to stop a launch. Calculations have shown that if you are flying above 120kts it is unlikely the launch crew will see – or hear - you in sufficient time to take such action.
Finally, gliders can be safely launched in very high wind speeds so it is unwise to assume the site is not launching just because other GA airfields in the area have ceased operations.
GA Book 12, which can be downloaded from elsewhere on this site, covers a number of gliding-related topics identified from Airprox in recent years. There have been a couple of very close calls and you may like in particular to look at the following:

Gliding site examples: 2005/010; 2005/018; 2005/066; 2006/016; 2007/015
Winch launch examples: 2004/155; 2005/061; 2005/073; 2005/199; 2007/052"

cats_five is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 07:19
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Inverness-shire
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are way way off thread here, but we seem to be in the process yet again of perpetuating the myth that gliders are only found in the vicinity of gliding sites. Reading the airprox reports, both military and civilian power pilots frequently express surprise at having seen (or in some cases not seen) a glider when there was no local gliding site.

Yes, there are more gliders near gliding sites. And there are winch cables and tug/glider combinations. But on a good soaring day there are a lot of gliders doing long cross country tasks well away from gliding sites. And they are particularly common in class G "pinch points".

So lets be careful out there.

Last edited by astir 8; 9th Feb 2010 at 08:19.
astir 8 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 08:36
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: now in Zomerset
Age: 62
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said Astir

In this case, the glider was still on tow with what looks like two air experience passengers. So it would have been operating in a known gliding area.

However, as I have seen myself, a lot of pilots don't really flight plan sufficiently. They draw a route on the GPS, write down frequencies and check runways, but don't think about local rules.

At our own airfield we have people joining in the overhead when parachute dropping is happening, or flying wide on the dead site and overflying the local gliding site.

It is all clearly marked on charts and in flight guides to avoid this, but it still happens.
peter272 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 09:44
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by peter272
<snip>
At our own airfield we have people joining in the overhead when parachute dropping is happening, or flying wide on the dead site and overflying the local gliding site.

It is all clearly marked on charts and in flight guides to avoid this, but it still happens.
It happens at other places as well - read the UK Airprox Reports. Pilots with so little situational awareness need a good dose of retraining IMHO - and don't think it's just novices that do this sort of thing. The incident I was involved in (which was dealt with informally over the phone which I gather was a suitably embarassing experience for the other parties) involved a list aircraft being flown by two instructors.

Also, don't think that carrying transponders will remove all risks - the UK Air Prox reports have examples where both aircraft were equipped. They also have examples where both were receiving an ATC service, and at least one recent one where the ATC routing could have been better...
cats_five is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 10:38
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Retford, UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are way way off thread here, but we seem to be in the process yet again of perpetuating the myth that gliders are only found in the vicinity of gliding sites. Reading the airprox reports, both military and civilian power pilots frequently express surprise at having seen (or in some cases not seen) a glider when there was no local gliding site.

Yes, there are more gliders near gliding sites. And there are winch cables and tug/glider combinations. But on a good soaring day there are a lot of gliders doing long cross country tasks well away from gliding sites. And they are particularly common in class G "pinch points".

So lets be careful out there.
But I guess its still valid to remind pilots to give glider sites a wide berth laterally and vertically if possible.

Also, it's not really a useful tip that you could meet gliders anywhere in class G - after all, it's incumbent on us to keep a good look out for any aerial device in class G airspace. It's not as though we could, or would even want to keep an eye out specifically for gliders.
MichaelJP59 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 14:11
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Third rock from the sun.
Posts: 181
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why all this talk of gliders?

In this tragic accident a collision occurred between two powered aircraft.
snapper1 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 15:26
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: suffolk
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly...but one poster at least is still trying to blame the glider for pulling off!
hatzflyer is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 18:11
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Age: 63
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The gliderpilot and passangers in an interview on MSNBC

Today Show Video Player
007helicopter is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 18:13
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Age: 63
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe this accident shows just how useless a BRS parachute recovery system is
777 got to say i think that is a really pathetic statement, what about the times it has saved lives?
007helicopter is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 19:20
  #34 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
apparently occurred is inside the Mode C veil making use of Tx mandatory for the powered aircraft with very few exceptions.
Which is why it is so confusing. It is also in an active TIS area and I would have expected the Cirrus to have at least TIS onboard.

Of course Mode C vales can be operated in without a txpdr with prior agreement with ATC so this could be a factor if as routine tug flight. I doubt it though, every aeroplane I have flown in America has a txpdr.

It may have nothing to do with transponders at all, and the cirrus may not have had a traffic system, who knows...
englishal is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2010, 20:58
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it likely in that area that they would have been too low for the radar to get a return to feed into the TIS?

dp
dublinpilot is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2010, 00:17
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Westborough
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No matter how you look at it the Cirrus if it was climbing, descending
or in level cruise did not have the right of way and had two people up front with four sets of eyes, and failed to see and avoid not one but two aircraft in flight and thinking both may have had there heads down inside the cockpit when they missed seeing both planes.
CenAir is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2010, 01:30
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,561
Received 41 Likes on 20 Posts
In the CBS interview, the pilot had pointed out one or two other gliders to the passengers, one of which contained her daughter and a friend.

The tow was at 8000' and climbing to 10,000' making the collision about 3000 AGL.

The glider pilot saw the Cirrus and immediately reached for the release -- my impression is that the Cirrus came from behind and obviously saw neither the glider or the tow plane.

I have observed gliders on tow countless times. The combination is considerably easier to pick out than a single aircraft as the glider is usually white and the towplane is usually in a high visibility color so that one of the colors stands out if the other color is hard to make out in the conditions.

Looking down on fall foilage, you spot the white glider first. The towplane blends in.

Against the sky the towplane usually stands out.
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2010, 09:46
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: now in Zomerset
Age: 62
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The film shows that the Pawnee was white but the glider was an odd set of colours.

The guys on the film certainly still looked to be in shock
peter272 is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2010, 01:07
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Westborough
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should be interesting to see the NTSB Report for the headings and altitudes for all the aircraft in this accident to see what really happened, not sure how anyone concluded the Cirrus was descending as well as behind the tow plane as I haven't seen any information for the same?
CenAir is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2010, 02:46
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Alexandria, VA
Age: 71
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tow Release Procedure

The Tow plane had a TX and was operational, or so it is supposed to be. The glider isn't required to have one, but there has been some improvements in the power consumption of TX's for gliders, That may become a requirement some day. But in this case, the TOW planes TX should have been all that was needed.

Someone asked what would happen when the tow line was released. It falls away some and the tow plane climbs some at the same time. The glider will normally turn to the right and the tow plane will turn to the left and begin to descend.So if someone is trying to fly under the tow rope, they might hit it. If they try to closely overfly or underfly the tow plane, they might hit it anyway.

So give a towed glider a wide birth in every direction. They do clear their turns, or are supposed to upon release, but don't bet your life on it. Following them is risky and certainly don't get into their blind spots as they can separate and manuver as I said before they see you.... Stay far away from them and make sure you know where they normally fly in your area. When a glider is approaching you head on or away, they are very hard to see. You usually see them when they turn, and you see those long usually white wings flash. And sailplanes are much faster than some may realize, the VNE for my Nimbus C glider is around 135 knots, so they can approach you quickly (I and most glider pilots normally cruise around 55 to 60 knots unless they are in a race).

That accident, I would bet, was due to lack of situational awareness on everyone's behalf. There were 3 pilots and some passengers that could have seen each other, but did not sadly. We tend to become complacent the more we do something, that is one of the greatest risks in aviation I think.

For those uninitiated in glider procedures, be aware of that glider turn right, tow plane turn left routine if you happen upon a towed glider some time....and don't forget about that tow line...

I'm a glider pilot and have released a few hundred times from a piper Pawnee like the one in the accident.

Mike
MASA Home
MikeVictor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.