Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

PPL air law question QNH & QFE

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

PPL air law question QNH & QFE

Old 16th Nov 2008, 21:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: EGBB
Age: 35
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPL air law question QNH & QFE

Hi,

I have my air law exam next week and im totally stuck on one type of question! Ive used the search funtion but with no success
Please help
The question is...

You are setting your altimeter at an aerodrome, where the elevation is -31 ft. The QNH you have been given is 1029 millibars. What would you expect the aerodrome QFE to be?
A 1015 millibars
B 1030 millibars
C 1028 millibars
D 1032 millibars


How would you work this out??
Thanks alot for any help in advance and hope this is the right section to put it in.

Cheers
Conk
conk757 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 21:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick revision of the basics;

QNH - the pressure you set on your altimeter subscale that will result in the altitude being displayed as feet above mean sea level.

QFE - the pressure you set on your altimeter subscale that will result in the height being displayed as feet above aerodrome datum.

In a standard atmosphere the pressure decreases by 1mb (or 1HPa) for an increase in height of approximately 30 feet.

Thus at an airfield with an elevation of 330 feet above sea level the QFE will be 11mb lower than the QNH.

To answer your question - your airfield elevation is -31 feet, therefore the QFE will be 1mb higher than the QNH of 1029mb - ie 1030mb, answer B.

HTH
Air Soul is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 21:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 41
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rule of thumb 1mb = 30ft so id go for 1030mb.This is because you lose approx 1mb per 30ft in height you gain.


Almost the same type of questions appear in MET too..

Liam
liam548 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 21:57
  #4 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Below sea level and QFE will be greater than QNH. Not many airports are actually below sea level!!

If you set your altimeter subscale such that the "altitude" is zero, the setting should be equivalent to the QFE. Do the same for the airfield elevation, and the setting will read the QNH.

Cheers

Whirls

PS edit - Air Soul's excplanation is more accurate but I fly from Norfolk where there's v. little difference!!
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 22:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: E Anglia
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody spot air soul's deliberate mistook?

Cusco
Cusco is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 00:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No, what is it?

MJ
Mach Jump is online now  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 06:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massachusetts Bay Colony
Age: 57
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody spot air soul's deliberate mistook?

Cusco
He added, rather than subtracted, the 1 mb. The problem airfield is 31 feet below sea level, so the QFE would be lower than the QNH. Answer should be 1028mb. (provided I've done my sums right here, of course)
Pitts2112 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 07:04
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 186
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh Pitts, this could be the start of a bad day for you.
Tone is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 07:26
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massachusetts Bay Colony
Age: 57
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course. You're right. I shouldn't just wake up and try to do math. I think a cup of coffee is required first.
Pitts2112 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 07:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tone, you beat me to it......
S-Works is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 08:20
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: EGBB
Age: 35
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks fore the replys

According to air quiz the answer was B

Could some please post a formula up because im still struggling?

Im fine with questions like...

You are approaching an aerodrome at an altitude of 1230 ft, with QNH 1015 millibars set. You set 987 millibars QFE for landing. What will your altimeter read now?

Is it along the same principles?

Conk
conk757 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 08:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
conk, the formula is the same you have been using. You just need to do what Pitts forgot to do and read the question properly!

The aerodrome was MINUS 31 feet which puts BELOW sea level. In this case the QNH was going to be lower than the QFE or put it another way the sea level was above the airfield so you are going to add rather than deduct.

QNH = 1029

Airfield Elevation is 31ft so 1mb BUT it is a NEGATIVE elevation so

1029 +1 = 1030

If it was a postive elevation then it would be 1028

There are a few negative elevation airfields around, I seem to recall Texel may be.
S-Works is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 09:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: one dot low as usual
Age: 66
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dislike questions like this. It's a trick question really as in over 20 years and 12,000 hours of flying, I have never landed at an airport below sea level ones.

(Some of the sea level ones were slightly lower after my landing, but not before - old aviation joke).
Fright Level is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 09:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the risk of trying to reply before coffee time, here's y stab at an equation;

QNH - (Airfield Elevation/30) = QFE


Airfield elevation is in feet.

AS
Air Soul is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 09:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have landed at Schiphol many times and I seem to recall it is minus 11ft.
S-Works is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 09:17
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: EGBB
Age: 35
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ooooooo i get it now

thanks for the help hopefully ill pass the exam now!
conk757 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 09:51
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are a few negative elevation airfields around, I seem to recall Texel may be.
Texel is 2 feet above.

I have landed at Schiphol many times and I seem to recall it is minus 11ft.
Correct. Furthermore, Lelystad is -13ft. And my home base, Rotterdam, is even -14ft. Those are the three fields in the Netherlands that are below MSL.

But in the Netherlands we don't do QFE, just QNH so it's all a bit of a non-issue.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 11:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: E Anglia
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I landed at Furnace Creek (Death Valley National Park Ca. -210ft) a coupla years ago, even though I knew it was below sealevel and by how much, the altimeter readings so spooked me on final that I threw the approach away, went around and sorted myself out: second circuit = perfect landing.

Cusco
Cusco is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 11:39
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: long left base EGCC
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile exam advice

You just need to do what Pitts forgot to do and read the question properly
Still just about the best equation to use in any exam at all (maths or not ! ) :

R.T.F.Q = (at least) 1/2 T.F.A
C172 Hawk XP is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 12:30
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Isle of Sodor
Age: 44
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are approaching an aerodrome at an altitude of 1230 ft, with QNH 1015 millibars set. You set 987 millibars QFE for landing. What will your altimeter read now?


810ft?
Got my Airlaw in the next 2 weeks, bloody dreading it. This QNH & QFE throws me too.

Last edited by BladeM3; 17th Nov 2008 at 12:41.
BladeM3 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.