Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

The Coventry Incident - the ONLY thread?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

The Coventry Incident - the ONLY thread?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Aug 2008, 12:31
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does Coventry Tower have an ATM?
matspart3 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 12:36
  #142 (permalink)  
CRX
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK.
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to confirm that the 'other' female onboard was indeed an instructor with the company, but that it WAS NOT Capt Burnham, well known in flight training circles and for flying the DC3. She will no doubt be acting as a strong pillar within the company right now, as she did with us at Highland when we lost our colleague several years ago. The lady deserves wider recognition (though she would never want it!) for her steadfastness and professionalism in every aspect of her work, I for one have been grateful for her wise words many many times.
Thinking of those at CVT in the long days ahead.

Paul.
CRX is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 12:58
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 752
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
mmflynn: there is absolutely no way at this time that I will have adversarial dialogue with you over this terrible accident.The airspace issues @CVT/DSA are well documented within my company(note,not other airfields)and despite everybody's best efforts the worst case scenario has happened.It could only be worse in terms of scale if a commercial airliner was involved.I do not know why 'sad for all involved' needs to be quoted but it manifestly is.Out.
olster is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 15:54
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: FL35
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to confirm that the 'other' female onboard was indeed an instructor with the company
Sad Loss

RIP to all
dreamliner787 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 16:45
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hampshire
Age: 50
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RIP all those tragically involved. From a personal perspective, WW will never seem quite the same again.

Those of us left - please lookout/listen out as much as is humanly possible. All of our lives depend on it.

Heartfelt condolences to the families of everyone involved.

Al
plinkplinkfizz is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 17:04
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firstly, this is a tragic accident and my thoughts are with family and friends who have suffered a loss.

In reading through this thread, whilst it is always helpful to see healthy discussion over the likley cause of any accident - and in so doing hopefully avoid a repetition - I am concerned over any speculation as to WHO might be to blame.

Clearly, something went seriuosly wrong here and questions need answers. Firstly, what happened? How did this happen? How can we avoid this happening again?

Until these questions are answered we will be no wiser. I am not familiar with CVT but , at 3 miles out the KR3 might reasonably have been turning finals and being in a banked left turnn would have had the approaching Cessna under his Straboard wing. Equally, the Cessna being established on the approach ( landing gear down), would have the KR2 obscured under the port wing.

Eyewitness reports the KR2 flying into the Cessna but it just as plausible that the Cessna descended into the KR2. Whatever the circumstances there was a fatal collision and neither aircraft saw the other until too late. There will be a reason their aircraft found themselves occupying same airspace - both perhaps in the belief that the other was elsewhere.

If the KR2 vanished under the port wing/engine of the cessna and the Cessna was blanked by the KR2 starboard wing in a left turn an accident of timing ( I guess 70Kts Vs 120Kts) might have easily resulted in the relative juxtapositions at 3 miles out.
Munnyspinner is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 17:18
  #147 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least we know that the Air Accident Investigation Branch have the resources to conduct a full and unmitigated investigation, and that a soon as they can release any substantial facts (prior to the publication of the full report) which may help such an awful accident happening again, they will do so.

Until then, professional discussion or genuine questions are perfectly acceptable, finger pointing or specualtion helps no one, especially the families etc of those involved.
niknak is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 18:42
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In Exile...
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bose-X - One of the females on board flew for AACF but not on the Dak. More often seen helming the Prentice or Dragon Rapide. A tragic accident. My condolences to all involved - everyone knows everyone in that particular corner of Coventry West, my thoughts are with you at this time.

Last edited by x933; 20th Aug 2008 at 20:24.
x933 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 18:48
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paul I can Confirm that Kath is alive and well in Nova Scotia. I just wish I could say the same about Sybilla, Harvey, Sofie and Jim.

Last edited by singleacting; 20th Aug 2008 at 19:55.
singleacting is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 20:07
  #150 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The BBC is now showing the names of all five who died.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 20:24
  #151 (permalink)  
CRX
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK.
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Singleacting- Thanks for the post, however I think you misunderstood mine, I was confirming to BOSE X that she wasnt on board as a result of his post.
Confused? Me too.
Anyhow I have had comms from Kath since Sunday, thanks mate.
And I share your feeling about the others only too well.
Stay strong.

Paul.
CRX is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 20:39
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry Paul

Give me a call sometime I think you know who I am.

I too have been in touch with Kath when I can get hold of her , my place in NS where she is staying has no phone line!
singleacting is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 22:04
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
mm flynn:
this could equally have happened in Class D airspace (operated to ICAO standards), and it could have happened regardless of which flight rules the 402 was following
Exactly. The "separations" between IFR and VFR - or VFR and VFR - on final approach in Class D are in effect the same as in Class G. They rely on what IO540 has dubbed "grey areas". There is one other thing though. Aircraft in contact with Tower and operating in the vicinity of an ATZ are receiving an ATC service and are expected to comply with ATC instructions - even if they're in Class G.

clearly if the 402 was receiving a RAS service he would be separated from everything
Not in this case. Coventry can't provide a RAS below 1700 feet in this area and in any case if he's been transferred to Tower he's effectively (another grey area...) no longer in receipt of a radar service.
NS
NorthSouth is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 22:59
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As the AAIB press release states BOTH a/c were inbound to Coventry this is more of an issue about how airports such as CVT operate than a Class G unprotected approach issue IMHO.
22/04 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 23:44
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newcastle
Age: 52
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apology

Please accept my apology of incorrect phrasing ref controllers around the Birmingham and Eastmids area.(I have amended the para) This was not aimed at anybody and my comment did not mean to highlight this area only there are many hotspots with high risk of a collision between luton and stansted is a classic and most of the london area. this was intended to be helpful and create awareness of high risk areas.
This accident could have happened to anybody pretty much at any time and I believe all of the crews to be of a very high standard. ATC in the uk provide an excellent service.

I offer my thoughts to all affected crews, families and ATC involved. this was a tragedy and a big loss to aviation.
SA120 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2008, 00:41
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm absolutely gutted for all those involved.
Sybille will leave a huge gap in the company - I did my initial IR with her and worked under her for a year prior to flying full time - she took no sh!t off anyone and knew her stuff inside out . . . hugely respected, , ,

I flew with Harvey too - a true gent . . . .

Rest in Peace you guys
CB
5150 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2008, 00:49
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A thought for the controller(s)?

Not wishing to drift the thread here (I am as saddened as any.)

However, out there right now there is/are one or two CVT controllers who were, most likely, doing their professional best last Saturday morning - and all within the constraints of the CVT ATC/ANO infrastructure many of us have known for years.

My own experience flying from CVT (starting 1968) was always that CVT controllers have been 100% helpful, co-operative and endlessly patient. You'd need a heart of stone not to feel for whoever was i/c on 119.25 on Saturday. Bless you and sleep well, you can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear.

Memories of many happy days restored by this tragic event.

Cheers bm
BoeingMEL is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2008, 05:54
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft in contact with Tower and operating in the vicinity of an ATZ are receiving an ATC service and are expected to comply with ATC instructions - even if they're in Class G.
Many people would disagree with the above (Class G is Class G regardless of who you are talking to) even if it seems perfectly reasonable to me that one should follow ATC instructions since they are usually given for a good reason.
IO540 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2008, 07:48
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Inverness-shire
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Much earlier on in this thread, someone mentioned that TCAS can have problems at low level and/or can give spurious readings from a/c on the ground if they have transponders switched on.

Can anyone provide informed comment?
astir 8 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2008, 08:16
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "GA" TCAS systems e.g. the Avidyne 600 work just fine.

They give useless readings from Mode A transponders because there is no altitude information.

But in the circuit, the information is presented OK, and is usable if everybody is transponding Mode C/S.

I've for some time been tempted to get the system but it's about £15k (plus or minus 5k depending whether G or N reg, which avionics shop you use, and whether you free issue parts bought from the USA) and the biggest problem is that existing antennae need relocating and that makes the installation into a very large job requiring the removal of the entire aircraft interior, and not many avionics shops can do a neat job of that on a TB20.
IO540 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.