Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Joining Procedure Blackbushe

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Joining Procedure Blackbushe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jan 2008, 21:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Daventry
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Joining Procedure Blackbushe

Will be flying into EGLK next month,could use some local advice for joining from the north so as not to upset the neighbours..Can't see any restriction for OHJ and I noticed that the circuit just clips Odiham MATZ.

All advice welcome.

MM
modelman is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 22:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Circuits are to the south for noise abatement but N. of the M3 in order to keep clear of Farnborough traffic. Circuit height for fixed-wing singles is 800ft by day, fixed-wing twins 1200ft by day, light Helis min 500ft but join mid-point. Night circuit height is 1000ft. Keep clear of noise-sensitive areas Yateley and Hartley Wintney. The survival of the airport depends upon this.

25 Left-hand from the North:

If you don't want to join overhead then track 160M to cross the 07 numbers at circuit height then integrate into the LH circuit. Turn base at the sailing club lake. The 25 FAT is curved to the south to avoid Yateley.
Watch out for aircraft flown by pilots who are unable to understand Rule 12 ie. not giving way to the traffic pattern by joining directly downwind or straight-in 25. If joining from the north-west or west avoid right turns on the dead-side in a left-hand dead-side joining pattern. I have seen many close shaves there. Larger helicopters may sometimes join for a noise-abated tight right-hand low-level circuit to land 25 western end.

07 Right-hand from the north:

Track 140 to fly down the disused R/W 14 for noise abatement, cross the 25 numbers at circuit height then turn right to track 160 crosswind to integrate into the circuit. Turn base before Hartley Wintney. Watch out for aircraft flown by pilots who are unable to understand Rule 12 ie. not giving way to the traffic pattern by joining directly downwind or straight-in 07.

Report downwind when abeam the upwind numbers and Final when established on FAT at or above 500 aal.

Ignore the Odiham MATZ. It only has a mandatory application to military aircraft. The Blackbushe ATZ has a greater status under Rule 45.

Expect an exemplary Flight Information Service on 122.3. The Biggles Bistro restaurant, run by a very nice Polish lady, is recommended. Enjoy your visit!
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 22:29
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Daventry
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many thanks

Tdm,
Thanks very much for the informative and speedy reply,will memorise it for my trip (and print it to keep).

When I get there,my friend may like a local 25 min flight,anything interesting to see in the area?

Thanks again

MM
modelman is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 22:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basingstoke...............
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 22:37
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Daventry
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basingstoke

Unfortunately,will not be carrying any ordnance
modelman is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 22:42
  #6 (permalink)  
Formerly HWD
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indochina
Age: 57
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you don't want to join overhead then track 160M to cross the 07 numbers at circuit height then integrate into the LH circuit...Track 140 to fly down the disused R/W 14 for noise abatement, cross the 25 numbers at circuit height then turn right to track 160 crosswind to integrate into the circuit.
Best give them a tinkle on the dog and bone to affirm. The procedure for a crosswind join when I was there last (about 18 months ago) was not to join over the numbers but to bisect the runway as the aircraft like 152s may manage to climb a few hundred feet by the upwind numbers. Also quite close to Yately for the 25 numbers.
Tony Hirst is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 22:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking of ordnance, just west of the sailing (Hawley) lake is REME at Minley Manor. They have a demolition pit where they play about with explosives so don't be surprised if you hear big bangs downwind, they may not necessarily be from your engine.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 22:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It could well be me answering that 'dog and bone'.....

Don't join midpoint.
Otherwise you will cut in front of bona fide downwind traffic who will least expect a 'Cabair'-style midpoint join.
It has never been standard procedure. Well, not since 1975. It would have to be one hell of a wind for a C152 to make 800 ft aal by the upwind numbers. Level at 400 aal on climb-out or go-around in orderto miss the 800ft crosswind leg traffic over the upwind numbers.

Follow runway 14 for 07 right-hand and you will miss Yateley.

None of this is difficult.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 07:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,826
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
If you arrive via OCK, please call Farnborough first!! (Nice views of Epsom Racecourse and Brooklands coming this way)
chevvron is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 08:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: heathrow
Posts: 294
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its not difficult while positioning for a r/h for 07 to stray over yateley, especially if you are approaching from the NE. if you do, expect a tongue lashing from TDM. i have been on the end of one in the past, and never did it again!
cjhants is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 09:08
  #11 (permalink)  
Formerly HWD
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indochina
Age: 57
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TDM,

I stand humbly corrected. Just to add that was the way both schools were teaching the crosswind join for the several years that I trained there!
Tony Hirst is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 09:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No. 10:

Probably not me, but possibly a FISO whose job depends on Section 52 Planning Agreement compliance. If one is approaching from the NE that would probably be after leaving the London CTR in which case it would seem preferable to head west until north of the ATZ and make the non-circuit-direction turns outside and join directly from the north.

N0. 11:

Mid-downwind joins were certainly not taught by the previous incumbents of the flying school adjacent to the Bistro when I was instructing for them. As a local ATS CAA examiner I would like to know if joining mid-downwind is being taught by either school. Mid-downwind joins cause cutting-in and bunching. We do observe it frequently and usually results in an innocent party having to go-around.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 13:01
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 2nm due S EGLK
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, be aware if you're following a Cabair aircraft around the circuit, you may need maps of Kent and/or Dorset depending on circuit direction and possibly radio nav equipment to find your way back to the airfield.
ThePirateKing is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 13:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Stroud
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OT - but Minley Manor is Royal Engineers or RE. The Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers (REME) are at Arborfield near Reading... Just to keep the en route commentary absolutely accurate
greenslade is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 14:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, greenslade, for the correction, quite right. Sorry, slip of the acronym from RE to REME. As long as they don't take ME out when I am next overhead......
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2008, 08:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a slightly odd experience flying into Blackbushe for the first time the other day, from the north. I called them when I was at Woodley NDB and requested airfield information. On the second attempt, I was told that I was “too far out” – and the FISO either demanded or suggested (couldn’t be sure which as he was speaking so fast) that I contact Farnborough. Now, I haven’t got a chart to hand as I type this, but I doubt Woodley is more than about 6 nm from Blackbushe. If I’d then gone to Farnborough, who are always busy (and this was a sunny day), I’d have been across the Blackbushe ATZ and on the way to the coast by the time I’d been able to pass Farnborough a message and then switch back again.

I found this behavour odd, and unhelpful. There is nothing in the AIP or the flight guides about a need to use Farnborough as quasi-approach control. I’ve never encountered a “don’t call us until …” requirement anywhere; in fact, many airfields publish their wish for an early call.
Vlad the Imbiber is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2008, 09:40
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vlad, you are correct. There is absolutely no requirement to contact Farnborough. I can follow this up for you if you would like but I need to know when it was (Sunday p.m.?). PM me if you prefer.

Blackbushe does suffer from users transmitting outside the DOC of 122.3 (10nm and 3000ft) and it is to be discouraged. Naturally if FISOs warn offending users over the RT they are exacerbating the situation if inviting reply. Maybe that had something to do with it. I don't think WOD is an unreasonable distance at which to make the initial call.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2008, 10:52
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks very much, Talkdownman, that's helpful. No need to follow up. I don't have a grievance -- I just wanted to learn whether I had done something wrong.
Vlad the Imbiber is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2008, 18:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Don't join midpoint.

It has never been standard procedure. Well, not since 1975. It would have to be one hell of a wind for a C152 to make 800 ft aal by the upwind numbers. Level at 400 aal on climb-out or go-around in orderto miss the 800ft crosswind leg traffic over the upwind numbers.
I was once given a telling-off by an Examiner when on a renewal at Blackbushe for joining over the 07 numbers. He said that it wasn't the C152s that were the problem but the high-performance a/c like the B200 etc that could well intersect with you and that a mid-point join was SOP. This was about 15 years ago.

TheOddOne

ps
Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers (REME)
??? New to me, thought it stood for 'Rough Engineering Made Easy' or 'wReck Every Machine Eventually'

Hat, coat, etc
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2008, 19:11
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Gusto
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blackbushe does suffer from users transmitting outside the DOC of 122.3 (10nm and 3000ft) and it is to be discouraged
OK, I'll try that in my little jet, and see how you like it.
Zorst is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.