Bulldog
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bulldog
Dear all,
I wish to pick your brains regarding the Bulldog.
Can anyone offer advice regarding the following
Maintenance costs (annuals , 50 hour checks etc) Fuel burn
Handling ( heard spin recovery can be a pig)
Would it make a good group aircraft?
I have spent all my time on touring aircraft so I have very little knowledge regading this type. Any views / opinions are gratefully received..........
Many thanks ZZ
I wish to pick your brains regarding the Bulldog.
Can anyone offer advice regarding the following
Maintenance costs (annuals , 50 hour checks etc) Fuel burn
Handling ( heard spin recovery can be a pig)
Would it make a good group aircraft?
I have spent all my time on touring aircraft so I have very little knowledge regading this type. Any views / opinions are gratefully received..........
Many thanks ZZ
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bulldog
ZoomZoom,
Old Sarum Flying Club operate two Bulldogs. From what I can understand, the big problem with the Bulldog is spares, which are both difficult and expensive to source. Hence, hire charges on the Bulldog are very high.
The person to talk to at Old Sarum is Mr. Simon Burt, their ops manager. I'm sure he will be able to fill you in on the joys and tribulations of operating a Bulldog.
Personally, as a group aeroplane I would have thought a Slingsby T67M would be a better option. You'd get much the same kind of performance and spares should be much less of a problem.
Broomstick.
Old Sarum Flying Club operate two Bulldogs. From what I can understand, the big problem with the Bulldog is spares, which are both difficult and expensive to source. Hence, hire charges on the Bulldog are very high.
The person to talk to at Old Sarum is Mr. Simon Burt, their ops manager. I'm sure he will be able to fill you in on the joys and tribulations of operating a Bulldog.
Personally, as a group aeroplane I would have thought a Slingsby T67M would be a better option. You'd get much the same kind of performance and spares should be much less of a problem.
Broomstick.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looked at the "dog" as an aerobatic aircraft for a flying club but I could not make the numbers work due to the fatigue index thing.
Untill someone gets to do the spar re-work and finds out how to get the cost down to something realistic the "dog" is a non-starter, this is a bit of a shame because it would be an ideal club aerobatic aircraft.
Untill someone gets to do the spar re-work and finds out how to get the cost down to something realistic the "dog" is a non-starter, this is a bit of a shame because it would be an ideal club aerobatic aircraft.
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Ultimate High operate some as well, so they must have an idea on the pluses and minuses.
Anything ex-MoD is bound to be expensive, over-complicated and hard to source spares for
Anything ex-MoD is bound to be expensive, over-complicated and hard to source spares for
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oxford
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My own Bulldog experience reveals that you get a lot of aircraft for the money, with maintenance costs comparable with any other 200HP injected Lycoming engine aircraft. Spares don't seem to be a problem for the Bulldog specialist maintenance orgainisations, and I suspect the buy price of a Bulldog + the mod to extend fatigue life (which will reduce in price once owners start getting it done) will still be less than a T67. For private ownership, even one at 95% of its fatigue life will give many years of typical PPL-type use, before you are faced with the decision on the modification. (Swedish, etc ones are lifed on hours rather than Fatigue Index). I would agree with the thoughts that if one were used a club aerobatic trainer, the fatigue life could be quickly consumed, though. However, doing 40 or so hours per year with gentle aerobatics sessions once or twice per month seems to have little impact on the fatigue index. I have been told that there is a market for fatigue-life-expired Bulldogs in the USA where they can continue flying under the 'Experimental' category, but haven't verified this.
When not doing aeros, you can put 100kg of luggage and stuff in the back, and go touring with decent range and speed.
Handling is delightful, if a little heavier than a Chipmunk for example. Visibility is great, so nice views - especially looking up at the ground, and it's difficult to make turns of less than 60 degree bank angle. Spin recovery is no problem - just learn how to do it with a suitably qualified instructor, and plenty of altitude. In reality even screwed up aeros don't seem to result in a spin - just hold everything central and you recover from an incipient spin into a nose-down attitude.
It's difficult to fault the Bulldog. If you're tempted by the type of flying it enables you to do... go for it!
When not doing aeros, you can put 100kg of luggage and stuff in the back, and go touring with decent range and speed.
Handling is delightful, if a little heavier than a Chipmunk for example. Visibility is great, so nice views - especially looking up at the ground, and it's difficult to make turns of less than 60 degree bank angle. Spin recovery is no problem - just learn how to do it with a suitably qualified instructor, and plenty of altitude. In reality even screwed up aeros don't seem to result in a spin - just hold everything central and you recover from an incipient spin into a nose-down attitude.
It's difficult to fault the Bulldog. If you're tempted by the type of flying it enables you to do... go for it!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Goodwood
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ZZ
Bulldogs IMHO much under-rated. Super piece of kit, lovely handling, great viz, strong if heavier than ideal. Unlike a T67 it will actually roll and has far more room inside. Spin faff not an issue if flown properly, whether by CFS or AC recovery technique.
Come along to Aero Expo this weekend to have a look at one of ours and I'll happily discuss costs. Spares not ideal but not as bad as many make out either.
Bulldogs IMHO much under-rated. Super piece of kit, lovely handling, great viz, strong if heavier than ideal. Unlike a T67 it will actually roll and has far more room inside. Spin faff not an issue if flown properly, whether by CFS or AC recovery technique.
Come along to Aero Expo this weekend to have a look at one of ours and I'll happily discuss costs. Spares not ideal but not as bad as many make out either.
The poor reputation for spinning came from it's introduction into the RAF. At first, the spin recovery used was similar to the Chipmunk's. The problem with this (and a problem which didn't occur on the Beagle Pup from which it was developed) was that the very large canopy partially blanked the rudder during the recovery. A couple of aircraft were lost. A change in technique resolved the problem and there are no recovery problems. However, the aircraft may go 'high rotational' in a spin. It looks dramatic but is easily recovered.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Goodwood
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
High rotational spin only occurs (very occasionally) if stick is not held firmly back against the stops whilst applying pro-spin controls.
Incipient spin recovery in any case works very well in practice if inadvertently starting to spin.
Incipient spin recovery in any case works very well in practice if inadvertently starting to spin.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Bulldog is a fantastic aircraft, I totally agree with the other comments regarding the sweet handling! I think I used to pay about £120 per hour to rent it so I dont think the maintenance costs could have been that bad?
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't fault anything that ALC says but my usage was based on a minimum of 300 hours a year, so untill the spar thing is sorted no "dog" for me !
Last edited by A and C; 24th Jun 2006 at 16:56.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Meon Valley
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought the RAF had one dog re-spared just before they sold them, to drawings and cert ? should be to hand.
As for cost, could it be a case of they need it so lets set the prise to milk them.
I remember a Beech sundowner had a new spar fitted aboutn 4-5 years ago (due to corrision on a 1700 hrs airframe) by airtime EGHH for about £ 3k, as part of a CofA issue.
Then again the dog was built strong, lots of easy to get at parts !!! so hours to complete works take longer and thats the main reason mx costs ate high.
As for cost, could it be a case of they need it so lets set the prise to milk them.
I remember a Beech sundowner had a new spar fitted aboutn 4-5 years ago (due to corrision on a 1700 hrs airframe) by airtime EGHH for about £ 3k, as part of a CofA issue.
Then again the dog was built strong, lots of easy to get at parts !!! so hours to complete works take longer and thats the main reason mx costs ate high.
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Handling ( heard spin recovery can be a pig)
ZZ: I'd reinforce what others have said about the handling, the Bulldog is a lovely aeroplane. We've operated them successfully at Old Sarum Flying Club for nearly 10 years - mainly for aerobatic training. Superb in roll, a little heavy in pitch, not terribly fast for the power. They have a "proper" spin when induced but are unlikely to spin from manouevre unless seriously provoked, spin recovery is standard.
The engine is standard Lycoming IO-360 (same as Arrow, Seneca and many more) so spares are very easy. The propeller is Hartzell. Fuel flow is roughly the same as an Arrow (10-14 gph leaned for best power, 8-10 when leaned for best economy). Engine is lifed at 1800/2000 hours.
Airframe spares haven't been too much of a problem. Batteries are expensive.
The stub spar needs a major mod around 5000 hours which extends the airframe life to 9760 hours (based on memory!); the estimate for the spar mod was £20k but I don't think anyone has done it yet.
Some aircraft have fatigue meters fitted and I believe the spar mod is required at F.I.114, but none of ours have had fatigue meters so someone else can confirm this. Most of the ex-RAF Bulldogs were sold with high FIs.
It would make an excellent group aircraft; easy to fly and with no vices. Some of the 'dogs on the market have basic panels and very high FIs and engine hours, others have an "airways" fit or dual panel and relatively low hours - prices vary accordingly.
Pop down the M3/A303 to Salisbury if you want to fly one.
Edited: oops, forgot to add:
DeHavilland support Ltd are the font of all technical knowledge http://www.dhsupport.com/beagle/index.html
Old Sarum are at 01722-322525, PM me if you want more details
HFD
The engine is standard Lycoming IO-360 (same as Arrow, Seneca and many more) so spares are very easy. The propeller is Hartzell. Fuel flow is roughly the same as an Arrow (10-14 gph leaned for best power, 8-10 when leaned for best economy). Engine is lifed at 1800/2000 hours.
Airframe spares haven't been too much of a problem. Batteries are expensive.
The stub spar needs a major mod around 5000 hours which extends the airframe life to 9760 hours (based on memory!); the estimate for the spar mod was £20k but I don't think anyone has done it yet.
Some aircraft have fatigue meters fitted and I believe the spar mod is required at F.I.114, but none of ours have had fatigue meters so someone else can confirm this. Most of the ex-RAF Bulldogs were sold with high FIs.
It would make an excellent group aircraft; easy to fly and with no vices. Some of the 'dogs on the market have basic panels and very high FIs and engine hours, others have an "airways" fit or dual panel and relatively low hours - prices vary accordingly.
Pop down the M3/A303 to Salisbury if you want to fly one.
Edited: oops, forgot to add:
DeHavilland support Ltd are the font of all technical knowledge http://www.dhsupport.com/beagle/index.html
Old Sarum are at 01722-322525, PM me if you want more details
HFD
Last edited by hugh flung_dung; 24th Jun 2006 at 08:39.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Meon Valley Flyer
You are quite correct that BAe did do the spar mod on one aircraft, and quoted the MoD a price per airframe that approached the level of the national debt of Bolivia.
So the MoD went off and found another type of aircraft to do the job, it is my contention that BAe was of the opinion that the MoD was over a barrel and would pay to have the work done but this backfired on them!
I have no doubt that when the time comes the UK GA industry will find a way to do the spar job at a fraction of the BAe price but I am told that a number of special bolts have to be made and it is financing the manufacture of these bolts that is the sticking point at the moment. Untill there is enough demand for a production run of these parts the total cost of the job is only speculation but I would not want to be footing the bill for the first aircraft spar re-life.
So the MoD went off and found another type of aircraft to do the job, it is my contention that BAe was of the opinion that the MoD was over a barrel and would pay to have the work done but this backfired on them!
I have no doubt that when the time comes the UK GA industry will find a way to do the spar job at a fraction of the BAe price but I am told that a number of special bolts have to be made and it is financing the manufacture of these bolts that is the sticking point at the moment. Untill there is enough demand for a production run of these parts the total cost of the job is only speculation but I would not want to be footing the bill for the first aircraft spar re-life.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Meon Valley
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So can anyone explain the real issue with the spar. Did SA just decide because the RAF were going to throw it around, they would give it a life limited to be safe, or was a problem found along the line.
As for expense of it. I have never flown any SA products and am not familiar with the design detail. But could someone explain the spar detail and why it costs so much to replace, hell I don't even know if we are taling about a wing spar or a ctr carry through ? After all its just a little ally fixed gear single !
As for expense of it. I have never flown any SA products and am not familiar with the design detail. But could someone explain the spar detail and why it costs so much to replace, hell I don't even know if we are taling about a wing spar or a ctr carry through ? After all its just a little ally fixed gear single !
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MVF
The RAF dogs have box that measures the stress (or fatigue) that is put on the airframe and the life of the spar assembly is lifed acording to the mesurments from this box, so if you fly only S & L the readings will be low and the aircraft will last a long time.
The snag is that aerobatics is what the dog is all about and it is a very good aerobatic trainer and so is often mis-handed this all amounts to the fatigue life getting used quite quickly if you use the aircraft for what it is good at (it is not a good touring aircraft!).
I looked at a dog for the leaseing business that I have and talked to DH support about the re-life of the spar and it requires the replacment of a lot of bolts with oversize items and the reworking of the bolt holes, the problem is the manufacture of the bolts requires a production run to make it economicly posable, so without an order for say thirty bolt sets the price of the bolts exceeds the value of the aircraft.
The dog is not the only light aircraft with a fatigue life the PA38 has a 13000 hour spar life and some of the UK fleet of PA38,s have already been scrapped as they have reached the spar limit.
It's all very well trying to get around the fatigue issue and if it is your aircraft and only you fly in it then you take the risk of it coming apart in the air and except that risk.
For me with a business I have to provide a product that meets all the requirments of a public transport C of A afterall if I did not the lawers would have a field day with me in case the of an accident even if the spar life had nothing to do with the accident.
The bottom line is how much is YOUR life worth to you?
The snag is that aerobatics is what the dog is all about and it is a very good aerobatic trainer and so is often mis-handed this all amounts to the fatigue life getting used quite quickly if you use the aircraft for what it is good at (it is not a good touring aircraft!).
I looked at a dog for the leaseing business that I have and talked to DH support about the re-life of the spar and it requires the replacment of a lot of bolts with oversize items and the reworking of the bolt holes, the problem is the manufacture of the bolts requires a production run to make it economicly posable, so without an order for say thirty bolt sets the price of the bolts exceeds the value of the aircraft.
The dog is not the only light aircraft with a fatigue life the PA38 has a 13000 hour spar life and some of the UK fleet of PA38,s have already been scrapped as they have reached the spar limit.
It's all very well trying to get around the fatigue issue and if it is your aircraft and only you fly in it then you take the risk of it coming apart in the air and except that risk.
For me with a business I have to provide a product that meets all the requirments of a public transport C of A afterall if I did not the lawers would have a field day with me in case the of an accident even if the spar life had nothing to do with the accident.
The bottom line is how much is YOUR life worth to you?
Last edited by A and C; 25th Jun 2006 at 09:17.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oxford
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interestingly, the hours life on Bulldogs not fitted with a fatigue meter must be based on worst case usage, as typical ex-RAF ones will have 8,000 to 9,000 hours, at 90 to 95% fatigue life. Straight and level flight adds nothing to the fatigue reading (but each landing is logged and has a tiny effect on FI), so with gentle flying, airframe life should not be an issue.
The current estimate on the spar mod cost is a similar order of magnitude to an engine replacement - TBO 1,800 hours. We all mentally or physically allocate an 'engine fund' - say £10 per hour, so another £10 per hour towards the spar mod isn't a huge deal... for a private owner for whom all this is some way off in the future. As a business proposition, it's clearly a different matter, as time to mod will be much shorter, down-time while it's being done means no income, etc.
Once done, the mod extends the FI from 114 to 200, so almost doubling the airframe life. I hope Bulldog owners can pull together and take advantage of economy of scale when it comes to commissioning a run of bolts, etc. That way the cost will be reduced for all of us.
The current estimate on the spar mod cost is a similar order of magnitude to an engine replacement - TBO 1,800 hours. We all mentally or physically allocate an 'engine fund' - say £10 per hour, so another £10 per hour towards the spar mod isn't a huge deal... for a private owner for whom all this is some way off in the future. As a business proposition, it's clearly a different matter, as time to mod will be much shorter, down-time while it's being done means no income, etc.
Once done, the mod extends the FI from 114 to 200, so almost doubling the airframe life. I hope Bulldog owners can pull together and take advantage of economy of scale when it comes to commissioning a run of bolts, etc. That way the cost will be reduced for all of us.