As an ex military helicopter pilot, it has confirmed my belief that most long haul pilots are over paid prima donnas!
|
Why should the off duty crew be entitled to first class anyway. Implying business class is not good enough for them is not a good PR look for the airline.. Given that contracts are a result of a negotiation it is simply the contract in action. |
Put yourself back in the interview for the role as pilot. If a question on this scenario was asked, what would you say you would do?
How about just having a non standoff attitude, looking after your employer and your livelihood and just grabbing any seat, putting the people who pay your wages first (the customer). Pathetic! |
Originally Posted by oldbeefer
(Post 10288065)
As an ex military helicopter pilot, it has confirmed my belief that most long haul pilots are over paid prima donnas!
|
Originally Posted by WindSheer
(Post 10288300)
Put yourself back in the interview for the role as pilot. If a question on this scenario was asked, what would you say you would do?
How about just having a non standoff attitude, looking after your employer and your livelihood and just grabbing any seat, putting the people who pay your wages first (the customer). Pathetic! The pax in J seats hadn't paid for J either.and made a fuss over nothing also!! Not handled well by anyone. |
So am I reading that if a passenger pays for a first-class seat or a business-class seat (this is speaking generally and not about this particular incident) and is asked to move to a lower class because pilots need to be transported for their duty and it's in their contract to be carried in first or business (as the case may be) the passenger is obliged to do so because the pilot's contract with his/her airline employer stipulates such a class of travel in the circumstances? Hasn't the passenger also entered into a contract with the airline to fly business or first (whichever he/she booked)?
|
Originally Posted by WindSheer
(Post 10288300)
Put yourself back in the interview for the role as pilot. If a question on this scenario was asked, what would you say you would do?
How about just having a non standoff attitude, looking after your employer and your livelihood and just grabbing any seat, putting the people who pay your wages first (the customer). Pathetic! To ask that Captain and crew to suddenly change a life time of culture and years of company arrangements? In the West we might now agree a compromise but, 40 years ago, would we have done so? Was the Captain of the ship still master of all he surveyed? As I said before, Thai Airways will (probably) learn from this but don't expect overnight changes. |
So am I reading that if a passenger pays for a first-class seat or a business-class seat (this is speaking generally and not about this particular incident) and is asked to move to a lower class because pilots need to be transported for their duty and it's in their contract to be carried in first or business (as the case may be) the passenger is obliged to do so because the pilot's contract with his/her airline employer stipulates such a class of travel in the circumstances? Hasn't the passenger also entered into a contract with the airline to fly business or first (whichever he/she booked)? |
Why should the off duty crew be entitled to first class anyway. Implying business class is not good enough for them is not a good PR look for the airline.. |
Originally Posted by Exup
(Post 10287467)
Or maybe the Airline should just honour the contract
|
Yes, the one under which the passengers paid to get a seat. |
Originally Posted by parabellum
(Post 10289064)
Any company worth its salt will block off crew seats well in advance, providing they have notice, crew movements are often scheduled and can be easily planned for without upsetting anyone.
The person I feel sorry for is the poor gate agent who is going to upset someone whatever they do - and they wont get any support from management over the decision made. |
Surely the as all the passengers in first class had been upgraded, the cabin crew decide who was likely to cause the least fuss and TELL them they had been upgraded incorrectly and the first class passengers had arrived, so they must reseat to business class. Not ideal but mistakes do happen. |
Surely the as all the passengers in first class had been upgraded, the cabin crew decide who was likely to cause the least fuss and TELL them they had been upgraded incorrectly and the first class passengers had arrived, so they must reseat to business class. Not ideal but mistakes do happen. |
Originally Posted by tescoapp
(Post 10289170)
I think you need to read the print of the seat contract your actually purchasing when you buy a ticket.
The pasengers paid top get on that flight at that time and the deadheads did not. Its pretty simple to understand unless you believe the airline exists for the benefit of pilots. |
Originally Posted by GrahamO
(Post 10290033)
I think you should stop trying to use semantics to avoid the simple fact that there's paying passengers who are entitled to a seat on that aircraft.
The pasengers paid top get on that flight at that time and the deadheads did not. Its pretty simple to understand unless you believe the airline exists for the benefit of pilots. |
I just paid for first class travel with Singapore. Is there a real chance that I might not get it ?
If so I would rather reschedule. Are certain airlines known for this kind of problem. |
SIA are an excellent airline, very passenger orientated and no chance you would be asked to move or displaced by positioning crew. Positioning crew travel on Economy tickets that are upgradable to First class IF SEATS ARE AVAILABLE. If you have already paid for a First class ticket your seat is confirmed.
|
Originally Posted by ZFT
(Post 10290054)
except no one paid for J seats on that flight so there was no entitlement
They paid for seats so their contract should come ahead of those who don't pay. Passengers first, deadheaders last. |
Originally Posted by GrahamO
(Post 10292342)
Yet more semantics which proves my previous point - an expectation that fee paying passengers are only there if there are no pilots who want the seat.
They paid for seats so their contract should come ahead of those who don't pay. Passengers first, deadheaders last. Nobody was offloaded. Nobody flew in a seat that was inferior to the one they had paid for. What part of that are you having trouble understanding ? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:33. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.