PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) (https://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf-self-loading-freight-61/)
-   -   Thomson-Questions, comments, bouquets & brickbats (Merged) (https://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf-self-loading-freight/363011-thomson-questions-comments-bouquets-brickbats-merged.html)

rm2242 20th Feb 2009 12:24

Thomson-Questions, comments, bouquets & brickbats (Merged)
 
Hi all

Booked to fly the TOM4242 on 23rd June 2009 (returning 4243 2 weeks later) from Gatwick to Skiathos. Originally the flight times suggested a stopover at Thessaloniki on the way home, so im guessing B738 equipment (i.e. not a 757 which does it non-stop, and no ex-FCA A320's based at Gatwick for S'09).

Now when i try and book the same holiday, the flight time on the way home is about an hour shorter.

So my question is - has the equipment been upgraded to a B757???

Also, used to have access to the TOM flight schedules on the ANA cargo website, but this no longer seems to hold them. Would love another source if anyone knows....

Regards

rm2242

anengineer 6th May 2009 15:58

All of you eat - or none of you.
 
I just tried adding in-flight meals to my holiday flight, (having booked the holiday weeks ago but not choosing meals at that time). Two of the three in our party want meals, the other one doesn't. Thomson have just told me that either we all have meals - or none, giving me some bizarre explanation about the meals all being located at one end of the aircraft (well, I didn't think the Captain kept them under his seat !).

I can't think of any justifiable reason for them to refuse to take meal orders for only part of our party. It smacks of rip-off tactics to me.

Are there any genuine reasons why this would be so ?

G-BPED 6th May 2009 17:19

I think this is due to the fact that all passengers that are having meals will be seated in one part of the aircraft to make the meals service easier.

The system may only be able to cope with Meal or No Meal for an entire party and not individuals in the party because of the seating arrangements.

Of course I stand to be corrected.

Regards,

G-BPED

sagered 6th May 2009 18:50

G-BPED You are correct, last time I flew with Thomson that was the case, all passengers with meals were seated together on the plane.

Sage

Saintsman 6th May 2009 20:56

Similarly with excess baggage. It was either 6 of us pay or none at all. That was something like £90. Now I'll make sure I'm under the limit.

anengineer 6th May 2009 22:14

Thanks for the replies. It seems rather a silly practice to me. However, I coughed up and paid for all three of us - the 'non eater' can still have nothing - and I can have double :ok:

A2QFI 7th May 2009 05:55

Eating two airline meals voluntarily! That is true desparation!

Envoy320 7th May 2009 08:32

aircraft meals for passengers are ticketed.....the lead passenger saying yes or no to a meal generates a reference for the whole party.

if everyone chose what they wanted in every group of passengers on a plane - it would never work.

WHBM 7th May 2009 13:09


Originally Posted by Envoy320 (Post 4910845)
if everyone chose what they wanted in every group of passengers on a plane - it would never work.

Hmmm ... I would guess you've never worked for a major scheduled carrier. :)

Envoy320 7th May 2009 13:37

WHBM - the meal or no meal option, when pre-booked, is for charter operations.....an altogether different "type" of operationand flight.

It would not work.

I believe the thread was in erlation to a Thomson holiday....charter carrier.

al446 7th May 2009 14:05

So you might even end up with almost a decent quantity.

Dropline 7th May 2009 16:12

Why would anyone pay extra for an airline meal???

Michael SWS 7th May 2009 17:58


Why would anyone pay extra for an airline meal???
Indeed. You can pick up a much tastier (and more nutritious) take-away meal from Pret or Eat in the departure lounge for about the same price or less.

Gulfstreamaviator 8th May 2009 14:11

beer drinkers sit together too
 
How stupid can aviation be...

All those who want to eat must sit together.

All those who drink red wine must sit together, and beer drinkers must sit in back three rows, to be near the toilet.

Have we all gone mad.?

Dont tell MOL.?

jetset lady 10th May 2009 21:37

Not that simple Gulfstreamaviator! The flights in question are with Thomson. Take their normal 757 aircraft. That's 235 seats, unless it's changed, and provisionally 235 passengers. Say,for example, that around half of those passengers have decided to book an inflight meal, thats 117 passengers to find from the list, assuming that none have swapped seats.

Now what is going to be quicker? Seating those 117 people in the same section of the aircraft or scattering them about all over the place and having to look for them one by one? I was priviledged enough to be working for Britannia, as it still was back then, when the joys of "Your Holiday, Your Choice" first came into being. During those first few days, passengers that had ordered a meal were scattered about the cabin, while the system glitches were worked out. It was, frankly, a b****y nightmare! Those that hadn't chosen to eat had to wait while we served the meals before they could get a drink, due to the meal carts being in the aisle, while the poor souls at the back of the aircraft that had paid for meals, were sat for ages waiting for them and then being offered tea and coffee before they'd even got the lids off the starters. In the meantime, those at the front were stuck with empty trays in front of them for far longer than should have been neccessary.

By grouping the passengers together, those that are eating should get their meals promptly, whilst those that have chosen not to eat, are able to have their drinks and snacks from the bar in the meantime. Much simpler, I think you'll agree, for everyone concerned.

As for suggesting that those drinking beer should be separated from those drinking wines etc? It's not quite comparable, seeing as the bars contain a mix of drinks...but then again, maybe it's not the same in your Gulfstream world! :rolleyes:

anengineer,

I hope this gives you some idea of why the seating is arranged as it is.

Jsl

P.S. I have to admit to not having worked for Britannia/Thomson for some years now so I apologise to all if things are done differently now or if I have remembered anything incorrectly! :O

13 please 12th May 2009 09:24

Great explanation jetset lady..!

I always wonder why some people when they don't understand something just completely condemn it, without just asking politely,

"why..?"

denachtenmai 14th May 2009 15:44

Thomson Airways. Tom 030
 
We are booked to go on TOM 030 to Montego Bay in June, I am assuming that it's operated by a Thomson 763, does anyone have any idea of the best seats to go for?
I have tried seatguru but Thomson Airways doesn't come up, I would like to get an exit seat as my wife had a total knee replacement in December:ouch:
Regards, Den.

eliptic 14th May 2009 15:59


exit seat as my wife had a total knee replacement in December
http://static.pprune.org/images/smilies/shiner.gif


:= against regulations

Lightning5 14th May 2009 16:02

Try 08701900737. This is Thomson airways and you can buy extra leg room seats, mainly at the overwing exits. Or Premier seats if you have lots of "dosh". However seat pitch has been increased to 32 in. and they are not to bad. Hope this helps.

**777lover** 14th May 2009 19:06

You'll be on a 757.


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:22.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.