PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) (https://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf-self-loading-freight-61/)
-   -   Another business class only service: Silverjet (https://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf-self-loading-freight/256701-another-business-class-only-service-silverjet.html)

teleport 18th Dec 2006 12:41

Another business class only service: Silverjet
 
Interesting interview in the Financial Times today with the CEO of Silverjet.
There is similarity of EOS and MAXJet flying business class only from London to US East coast. A few novel features:
  • Dedicated checkin lounge/security
  • Ladies only toilets
  • Transfer via helicopter from Battersea
  • Minimal announcements
  • No overhead lights
  • No trolleys

Start next month to Newark from Luton

Avman 18th Dec 2006 16:11

Sorry, but unless they've got disgraceful amounts of dosh to throw away, I give them 6 months max. I hope I'm proved wrong!

PAXboy 18th Dec 2006 16:31

There is a long running thread about these folks in the Airports, Airlines & Routes forum. They have been preparing for some time and the thread consensus is that they stand a reasonable chance. IIRC they are now doing route proving, the first a/c was out of the paint shop last week.

teleport 18th Dec 2006 18:02

Is there room for another one?
Well, BA on its own sends at least 9 big jets back and forth daily to NY alone.
EOS and MAXJet may still be in the investment phase, but tell the travel press about reasonable load factors.

Tigger4Me 4th Jan 2007 13:28

Message for the Mods
 
Mods - Posts #5 to #19 on here all relate to Maxjet. As this thread relates to Silverjet could the posts be moved to the Maxjet thread please.

Done...

RealFish 4th Jan 2007 21:05

Seems that SJ have got their marketing relationships up and running and seem to know whta they are doing.

I had a mag and insert from Kuoni last week offering a very reasonable 4 nights in NY in a 4* with Silverjet flights included.

teleport 25th Jan 2007 14:29

Carbon offset
 
Today's FT reveals that SilverJet (which BTW launches its service today) charges a mandatory carbon offset contribution fee of about £10.

On the face of it may be OK, but what about the initial flights which are unlikely to sell out?

silverelise 25th Jan 2007 15:32


Originally Posted by teleport (Post 3026200)
Is there room for another one?
Well, BA on its own sends at least 9 big jets back and forth daily to NY alone.
EOS and MAXJet may still be in the investment phase, but tell the travel press about reasonable load factors.

I haven't seen the prices from SilverJet but Maxjet are cheaper than BA CW and offer a better product. The only downside I can see from a business perspective is Stanstead rather than Heathrow.

teleport 25th Jan 2007 16:42

London-New York - out Mon Feb 5, back Thu Feb 8

BA £3,960
Virgin £3,980
Eos £3,210
American £2,880
Maxjet £1,670
Silverjet £999

PAXboy 25th Jan 2007 17:15

Very sensibly, SilverJet are buying market share to get folks on board to spread the word. This kind of discount for the start-up period is standard practice.

My guess is that the people who will use Silver/Max/EOS are those who live closer ot them and do not want ot have to go to cronky old LHR. Although they may not get FFMs, there will be many benefits. If, say, someone is in Northampton, then LTN is well placed.

I expect that they will get some good package deals with cruise liners too bu thte dyed in the wool corporates will not move.

teleport 25th Jan 2007 17:53

CEO states that SilverLink will break even at 65% load and if it gets 20,000 passengers per annum or half a per cent of the market per aircraft.
However it (and MaxJet/EOS) clearly aims for the BA/VS premium travellers.

Some time ago I sat on an EOS flight at JFK(-LHR) which went tech. As soon as we were back at the gate, the city types made mobile calls and de-boarded to grab a flat bed on one of the fleet of BA/VS planes going across every night.

Question is: how does the reliability of the new small premium players stack up?
How important is it to the well heeled not to have to mix w. Y class travellers?

172driver 25th Jan 2007 18:00

why only NY ??
 
There's one thing I don't quite get with MAX/EOS/Silver - why only NY ? OK, it's certainly the biggest market, but it's also the route where C class makes least sense due to short duration of flight. Also the one probably (I have no figures to back this up) most travelled by corporates who are on a travel policy with BA/VS/UA whoever. I'm sure (or would at least hope) these guys have done their homework, but would destinations like LAX, SFO, MIA where the flying time in cattle class really becomes a pain not make more sense ??

J32/41 25th Jan 2007 18:15

I guess the 767's that Maxjet use & the 757's EOS use wouldn't make LAX non-stop with an average flight time of around 11hrs.

:) :)

Feck Nose 25th Jan 2007 18:59

New York is the busiest business route accross the pond so it makes sense to start on that route...

With only 100 pax the 767 should have quite a long range so dont rule out routes that would normally be a stretch with 300 pax + Baggage!

By the end of the year as they get more aircraft Silverjet should have a few different routes and higher frequency that suit the business traveller

Goodluck Silverjet!

PAXboy 25th Jan 2007 23:03

teleport

Question is: how does the reliability of the new small premium players stack up?
All carriers start small. I recall that VS started with a single 747 (series 100 or 200) and when they went tech, everyone shouted them down. But 21 years later?

If you book with one of this new generation you accept that there may be delays and upsets but you will gamble that for higher service and/or lower cost. Once in a while, the gamble will not pay off.

My guess is that the rest of the world will see more of these and then, in five years time, some consolidation. Good luck to all!

Globaliser 26th Jan 2007 16:26


Originally Posted by 172driver (Post 3089511)
OK, it's certainly the biggest market, but it's also the route where C class makes least sense due to short duration of flight.

On the contrary, because of the short duration of the flight this is a route on which it makes a great deal of sense.

The majority of business class passengers are not people who are swanning around the world to enjoy the fine wines and gourmet cuisine on board their aircraft. They're people who are going to get on board the aircraft at (say) 8 pm, fly for just over 6 hours, arrive in London at 8 am - and then be expected to be at their desks in the office as soon as they can get there, or even be in a meeting by 11 am. Every minute of sleep is valuable. That's why BA and VS have products like the Sleeper Service on these short routes.

When you add to that the fact that it's not only a big market but a very rich market as well (the only profitable year-round Concorde route ever, for example), the targeting makes sense.

If confirmation were needed, look at the way that Maxjet has temporarily dropped Washington - but New York remains in place.

Doors to Automatic 29th Jan 2007 10:05

From a route economics point of view such a service will only be viable if it can be serviced by a single aircraft, or multiples thereof, meaning it is unlikely that any route over 9 hours or so would be launched.

derekl 29th Jan 2007 22:39

Nice razor . . .
 
I've just received a promo mailshot from Silverjet -- a free Silverjet-branded tri-blade razor. "We shave £2500 off a flight to New York . . ."

I'll report on the razor later.


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:58.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.