LHR landing: going up in stacks after lightning
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: FRA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LHR landing: going up in stacks after lightning
Hi everyone!
I experienced a very disturbing flight as a PAX into LHR yesterday.
Coming from the European continent, the A320 Neo descended into very dark clouds over London. We were struck by lightning (loud bang) which I believe I could see out the widow hitting the right wing. At this point we were at just over 800meters hight.
The pilot immediately revved up the engines and "jerked" the plane up to 1400 meters. It felt like it was flying irradically for a while with lots of powerful moves which made me feel all the Gforces.
Pilot then announced that it was a lightning strike and that Heathrow was too busy to let us land. We would try again in 5 minutes.
The 5 minutes felt like a real struggle (PAX perception obviously).
We finally re-started a straight descent into LHR and landed with windshears etc but safely. The cabin crew with over 20 years experience seemed utterly disturbed upon landing. So was I.
I have worked as cabin crew for years and although I have experienced lightning, I have never experienced such a strange sudden increase in speed and problematic approach.
Any ideas what could have been the issue? Would ATC at LHR really instruct to go up in the stacks? The clouds were just as bad at the other flight level.
Here is the tracking for the flight: https://fr.flightaware.com/live/flig...310Z/EDDF/EGLL
Thanks!!
I experienced a very disturbing flight as a PAX into LHR yesterday.
Coming from the European continent, the A320 Neo descended into very dark clouds over London. We were struck by lightning (loud bang) which I believe I could see out the widow hitting the right wing. At this point we were at just over 800meters hight.
The pilot immediately revved up the engines and "jerked" the plane up to 1400 meters. It felt like it was flying irradically for a while with lots of powerful moves which made me feel all the Gforces.
Pilot then announced that it was a lightning strike and that Heathrow was too busy to let us land. We would try again in 5 minutes.
The 5 minutes felt like a real struggle (PAX perception obviously).
We finally re-started a straight descent into LHR and landed with windshears etc but safely. The cabin crew with over 20 years experience seemed utterly disturbed upon landing. So was I.
I have worked as cabin crew for years and although I have experienced lightning, I have never experienced such a strange sudden increase in speed and problematic approach.
Any ideas what could have been the issue? Would ATC at LHR really instruct to go up in the stacks? The clouds were just as bad at the other flight level.
Here is the tracking for the flight: https://fr.flightaware.com/live/flig...310Z/EDDF/EGLL
Thanks!!
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds perfectly normal, lightning strike on approach so go around, check that all is well, and try again.
A go around at LHR can feel a tad hairy because the airspace is very congested so manoevering is restricted.
A go around at LHR can feel a tad hairy because the airspace is very congested so manoevering is restricted.
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Watched it on FR24 and it looked to be a perfectly normal manoeuvre following the lightning strike. As mentioned above, it would have been wise, just to be sure, for the crew to initiate a GA following the lightning strike to ensure all was well rather than continue that approach in IMC conditions. The subsequent track clearly indicates that ATC neatly vectored the aircraft around into the next available "slot" in the landing sequence. At no time did the aircraft re-enter the stack.
Edit: Was busy faffing whilst DR basically posted the same conclusion.
Edit: Was busy faffing whilst DR basically posted the same conclusion.
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dundee
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Once sat through a go around landing in a BA737 at Gatwick. First thing was engines spooling up followed by a wee tug upwards and away she went, quite exhilarating actually but some frowns from around cabin. ga triggered by fod on runway which was a panel from previous to. Think the pilots like the opportunity to employ some of the latent performance available.
Generally speaking, lightning = thunderstorm, and thunderstorm = turbulence. Wouldn't really surprise me at all to get a rough and disturbing flight in the vicinity of lightning.
That's in addition to the tight turns and maneuvering the airspace may require, as correctly described previously.
That's in addition to the tight turns and maneuvering the airspace may require, as correctly described previously.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: FRA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all this insights gents! Makes alot of sense. Yes, I have experienced go-around at LHR shortly before touch-down on the runway which was fine.
DaveReidUK why do you think the return flight was delayed even though the aircraft landed on time? Inspection for lightning damage?
DaveReidUK why do you think the return flight was delayed even though the aircraft landed on time? Inspection for lightning damage?
DaveReidUK why do you think the return flight was delayed even though the aircraft landed on time? Inspection for lightning damage?
Lufthansa Technik: Lightning strikes during flight
.
The pilot immediately revved up the engines and "jerked" the plane up to 1400 meters. It felt like it was flying irradically for a while with lots of powerful moves which made me feel all the Gforces.
Pilot then announced that it was a lightning strike and that Heathrow was too busy to let us land. We would try again in 5 minutes.
The pilot immediately revved up the engines and "jerked" the plane up to 1400 meters. It felt like it was flying irradically for a while with lots of powerful moves which made me feel all the Gforces.
Pilot then announced that it was a lightning strike and that Heathrow was too busy to let us land. We would try again in 5 minutes.
In actual fact, looking at the trace of the track, the whole team would have been working their butts off the moment the final approach was disturbed by the strike, and co-ordinated the aircraft back round as first priority in the minimum possible time, while handling everyone else on the approach who are now making way for this aircraft.
I think the comment about LHR being too busy to let us land falls into the say something that doesnt worry the passengers much and of course while no doubt LH pilots speak excellent English its not their first language . In any event it sounds better than 'we have been hit by lightening and are going around again in case it has damaged the aircraft '
I am sure LH pilots who are large and regular users of Heathrow would never bad mouth LHR ATC intentionally .
If I could diverge into a huge thread drift, the only common thing being a 'surprise' during a landing-I have just come back from Sri Lanka and when the LHR-CMB flight touched down , a nice stable approach followed by a nice solid firm landing , the reversers deployed normally and powered up but after about 5 seconds the brakes came on at level I have never previously experienced and there was a massive deceleration which flung everyone against their belts . i know there are many possible reasons from runway incursion to misjudging trying to make a taxiway but it sure was a graphic demonstration of the power of modern aircraft brakes (A330-300) and more importantly why you should make sure your seat belt is properly fastened , no belt on this trip and you would have got face full of seat back very very quickly .
I am sure LH pilots who are large and regular users of Heathrow would never bad mouth LHR ATC intentionally .
If I could diverge into a huge thread drift, the only common thing being a 'surprise' during a landing-I have just come back from Sri Lanka and when the LHR-CMB flight touched down , a nice stable approach followed by a nice solid firm landing , the reversers deployed normally and powered up but after about 5 seconds the brakes came on at level I have never previously experienced and there was a massive deceleration which flung everyone against their belts . i know there are many possible reasons from runway incursion to misjudging trying to make a taxiway but it sure was a graphic demonstration of the power of modern aircraft brakes (A330-300) and more importantly why you should make sure your seat belt is properly fastened , no belt on this trip and you would have got face full of seat back very very quickly .
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WHBM... you sure have a "Hollywood" view on LHR ATC. Nobody would have worked their buts off. A go-around, as suggested by Dave's post, is not unusual and it is no big deal fitting a go-around back into the landing stream. A maximum of two controllers would probably have handled the "event". Sorry to disappoint you!
