Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Norwegian new seats 16.8 inches wide!?!?!

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Norwegian new seats 16.8 inches wide!?!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jul 2018, 23:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Norwegian new seats 16.8 inches wide!?!?!

Norwegian will introduce the new seats on their fleet of Boeing 737 Max’s.

The new seats will be 16.8 inches wide with a 30 inch pitch.

The average seat width is approximately 17 inches, while some American airlines offer as much as 19 inches.

Norwegian’s new fleet will be used for their UK to New York and Boston routes. UK to NY with 16.8 inches wide?!?!?!?
“However, customers who find airplane seats are already too narrow (the new seats are as much as 2 inches narrower than most American airlines), will find their comfort will be reduced, even more so as there will no longer be seat cushions.” and no seat cushion.....
underfire is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2018, 23:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sussex
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AA, according to seat guru, have achieved 16.6 on a MAX...
Gulf Julliet Papa is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2018, 23:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
What’s the point of reducing seat width to such a painful dimension?


Its not like you can squeeze in an extra seat across, I understand reducing the pitch as that can allow extra rows but this seems pointless


It seems incredibly uncomfortable
stilton is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 00:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NV USA
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe they're increasing the width of the flight attendants?
cappt is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 01:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: London/Fort Worth
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UK to New York on the 737? - not sure I fancy that whatever the seat width is.
BAengineer is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 01:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: #N/A
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or setting themselves up for sale, so the legacy carriers can offer more of a differentiated product
rationalfunctions is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 05:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Only occasionally above FL50
Age: 71
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
If an average seat is 17 inches wide and some American airlines have seats 19" wide then simple math(s) suggests that seats less than 17" wide must not be uncommon. Is the average person going to notice if a seat is 0.2" (5mm) narrower than average? Who works out these averages anyway?
Andrewgr2 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 05:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More aisle space is helpful for fast turnarounds and on time ops. However Norwegians are tall and XL guys that need some space. Almost as much as chubby Germans.
Kerosene Kraut is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 06:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,272
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Perhaps they're trying to dissuade obese pax from flying with all that extra weight.
crewmeal is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 06:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wiedehopf is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 07:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,536
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
It means sitting down is similar to maneuvering a vehicle into a tight parking space. Basically your hips and thighs will be touching the sides most of the time, if you have significant love handles then these will be rubbing as well. The increased comfort from the extra legroom is partially negated by the reduction in width. Tall and thin are best suited to this.
krismiler is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 08:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by krismiler
Tall and thin are best suited to this.
If the reported 30" seat pitch is correct, they aren't.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 09:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you don't like it, then don't fly with them. If enough people did that the airlines would get the message. The problem is most of the travelling public want to fly for peanuts and then complain about their discomfort! I, for one, do not fly with airlines which don't provide me with my minimums for comfort, regardless of how cheap their fares might be.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 11:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
You might get someone to fly the first time. Getting repeat business could be another matter. I had a workmate who was 4ft 11 in old money and told her she had a great future in testing airline seats.
Peter47 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 13:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Age: 78
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wiedehopf posted the real answer - only the bulkhead seats are narrower to accommodate the tray table. I thought it had to be something to do with the armrests as the seat rows remain at 6 and aisle width was unchanged. So only bulkhead seats change, just like I have seen on many airliners in the past. Not much of a story here.
NWA SLF is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 13:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The South
Posts: 305
Received 55 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Hotel Tango
If you don't like it, then don't fly with them. If enough people did that the airlines would get the message. The problem is most of the travelling public want to fly for peanuts and then complain about their discomfort! I, for one, do not fly with airlines which don't provide me with my minimums for comfort, regardless of how cheap their fares might be.
I agree in principle, however, it depends where you live sometimes. In some areas the availability of flights to the destination you need is pretty limited. I recently flew with a well known Irish airline - which I always avoid if at all possible - and could barely get hold of the seat belts if they were between me the side of the seat and I am not exceptionally wide. I am over 6 foot tall and anything other than an emergency exit on a low cost carrier is close to impossible. If a legacy airline served my needs I would willingly pay for the better quality of travel.
It is worth noting in the present industrial climate that the crew were professional and charming; the employer doesn't deserve either them or the business it attracts.
Timmy Tomkins is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 15:42
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 48
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hotel Tango
If you don't like it, then don't fly with them. If enough people did that the airlines would get the message. The problem is most of the travelling public want to fly for peanuts and then complain about their discomfort! I, for one, do not fly with airlines which don't provide me with my minimums for comfort, regardless of how cheap their fares might be.
That works very well if you're the one that's paying the fare. With roughly 40% of air travel being for business, paid for by business, with air fares chosen based on the lowest fare per CWT, Concur or whatever agency the business uses, a lot of people will not have a choice to make.
ph-sbe is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 20:23
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Delta seat widths per ac...https://www.delta.com/content/www/en...900er-739.html
You must also check where the measurement is from. Some use center of armrest to center, others use distance between armrests

Last edited by underfire; 6th Jul 2018 at 20:36.
underfire is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 20:33
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: London/Fort Worth
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NWA SLF
Wiedehopf posted the real answer - only the bulkhead seats are narrower to accommodate the tray table. I thought it had to be something to do with the armrests as the seat rows remain at 6 and aisle width was unchanged. So only bulkhead seats change, just like I have seen on many airliners in the past. Not much of a story here.
I agree, it's a non story. If you take any airline that has fixed armrests to accommodate the tray table then I doubt that they will be significantly different from these measurements if at all.
BAengineer is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2018, 21:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kerosene Kraut
More aisle space is helpful for fast turnarounds and on time ops. However Norwegians are tall and XL guys that need some space. Almost as much as chubby Germans.
Tall guys need more leg room, especially if they don't have the seat width to allow a bit of diagonal leg alignment. If they're tall and wide then they really need both.
llondel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.