Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Disruptive Passengers - MERGED

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Disruptive Passengers - MERGED

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th May 2015, 05:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Doncaster
Age: 50
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sympathise with Cabin Crew...

We flew Heathrow to Vegas on Thursday with BA. Although the plane was old, the flight became even older, thanks to a few people who drank far too much.

The Cabin Crew dealt with them exceptionally well (although when one of them lit a cigarette in the toilet I suspect we were close to diverting), and put up with what could only be described as a rabble.

We spoke to some as we left the airport and they said it was the worst they had seen. They worked hard for their pay, and I hope that some will see this and take on board the appreciation meant.
davidjpowell is online now  
Old 24th May 2015, 09:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They should have diverted to Greenland and left them there!
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 24th May 2015, 19:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 39
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope they at least reported the smoker to the authorities on arrival in the USA. Putting an airliner in danger isn't something the LVPD would look on too favourably I imagine.
edi_local is offline  
Old 24th May 2015, 21:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 68
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Noted following in Transport Canada occurrence reports for May 19:

Due to an unruly passenger, a British Airways Boeing 747 400 (BAW274), from Las Vegas (KLAS), NV, to London (EGLL), UK, requested to change its destination to Montréal (CYUL), QC. BAW274 landed without incident at 0857Z and with no impact on the operation.
If you are looking for peace and quiet, LHR-LAS appears to be a flight to avoid
ExXB is offline  
Old 24th May 2015, 21:28
  #5 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,145
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Reminds me of a trip at least 25 years ago to Montego Bay (out of LGW, I think) on a BA 744 (I think it must have been)

We had managed to get the exit row in Y (I was young and fit in those days!) and children ran up and down the aisle and played around noisily in front of us, dashing in and out of the loos and banging the doors. The CC sympathised and said, "If we say anything to the parents - we'll get sceamed at."

One of them said something I have not forgotten, "We are on a 7 hour sector and we presume the parents know that but AS they step on board - they ask for free nappies for the baby."

So I think we can say that pax have been making their demands for a long time ...
PAXboy is offline  
Old 24th May 2015, 22:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somewhere Warm
Age: 71
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Today, making that nappy request might be considered extortion or a terroristic threat. After all, if the parents don't get them, then the passengers end up with hours and hours of baby poo smell. Oh the horror!
TrakBall is offline  
Old 25th May 2015, 06:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,271
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Vegas is the new 'chav' destination. It will give some slight relief to the Costas
crewmeal is offline  
Old 25th May 2015, 17:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are looking for peace and quiet, LHR-LAS appears to be a flight to avoid
People who willingly go to LAS deserve what they get ....what a dump.
mixture is offline  
Old 25th May 2015, 18:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Near Gatwick
Age: 50
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Passengers that treat crew terribly are essentially allowed to because the airline probably won't back their staff up and support any decision made by the people they employ.


Like any organisation which deals with the public, airlines get the customers they deserve.
InSeat19c is offline  
Old 25th May 2015, 19:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Centre of Universe
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sympathise with Cabin Crew...

Inseat
My experience of BA is they support their staff when it comes to this sort of crap. Yes they had some spates industrially but I'd be surprised if they didn't support their hard working cabin crew
Twiglet1 is offline  
Old 25th May 2015, 19:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps what we're missing here is that, unlike the paranoid overreactions we see with American crews these days, this crew managed to deal with the problem and ensure all got to LAS safely and on time. Perhaps we should at least give them and BA credit for that.

Standing by for incoming from my American cousins
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 25th May 2015, 20:10
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Doncaster
Age: 50
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We spoke to someone while waiting for the rental shuttle who knew someone on the flight crew of the flight mentioned that did divert. Apparently got on board drunk and proceeded to be quite sick, eventually the crew had enough. (The drunk - not the crew!)

I suspect our flight was very close to being diverted. Certainly the stewards became very firm and direct in the end.

As for Vegas. It's my first time over here. We've got our 9 year old daughter which is very restricting. While I'm not overly bothered about getting drunk, a beer in a bar would be nice.

Still it's all about our wedding in a few hours.... Then we're off to Florida to relax
davidjpowell is online now  
Old 27th May 2015, 17:30
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hats off to the Cabin Crew for what seems to be a horrid flight. I sincerely hope any airline backs it's crew up in situations like this.

As a passenger I would hate to witness anything like this and to inconvenience everyone by forcing a plane to divert should carry the most extreme penalties.
Cromerpaul is offline  
Old 28th May 2015, 13:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Herts, UK
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Passengers that treat crew terribly are essentially allowed to because the airline probably won't back their staff up and support any decision made by the people they employ.


Pile of rubbish. My airline deals with about 400 similar incidents a year and we back the crew every time (so long as evidence supports that the crew acted in accordance with their procedures and training). Every other UK carrier is exactly the same. It doesn't stop the rate going up each year, society is changing and people are becoming more belligerent and less accepting of being instructed.

Can you share what your experiences are of carriers failing to support crew when passengers have broken the law, and the crew have acted in accordance with their training? And you can't use that Korean peanut one, that was quite the anomaly!
Laarbruch72 is offline  
Old 28th May 2015, 19:00
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,271
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Agreed. Airlines work hard to train crew to be able to deal with different situations that may occur. There will be lots of role play based on situations that have happened. Training will take many forms with the emphasis on security and 'playing down' an incident. In reality if all fails then the Capt will be a position to divert as required.

To say airlines don't back their staff is utter crap!
crewmeal is offline  
Old 28th May 2015, 19:47
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 21 Posts
is causing planes to divert to chuck off passengers displaying drunken rowdiness and general chav behaviour a peculiarly British thing? I know the US has a fair share of diverted flights but they seem more related to the 'nutter ' factor prevalent there.

I spent many years in Bermuda and still regularly check out the local paper there and they seem to have a quite frequent trade in diverting UK-Caribbean/Mexico fights to drop off drunk Brits.

before people say that's not a bad place to get chucked off it is horrendously expensive and moralistic so a big fine immense bill for even a few days in hotel and very expense BA single back to the UK sobers them up I am sure , but are other nations as bad?
pax britanica is offline  
Old 28th May 2015, 20:43
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but are other nations as bad?
Generally, I would say no. I travel mainly on German, Dutch and Belgian airlines. I've occasionally come across groups having fun and becoming loud, but without any aggression. If the crew ask them to turn it down they generally apologise and comply. The only aggressive groups I have ever personally witnessed have, with only one exception, been Brits. And that is just about anywhere. The Brits are by no means alone, but they are the biggest culprits by far.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 29th May 2015, 02:01
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,642
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
Mother kicked off United flight because her two-year old was crying

http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/topstories/...-son-1.3091165
India Four Two is offline  
Old 29th May 2015, 03:41
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: U.K.
Posts: 1,868
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
To give them credit, my airline (and I think practically every airline) would back up myself and my crew if we requested the captain call ahead for the authorities or to consider diverting.

The Brits are big drinkers, it often forms part of their holiday and when 'most' people work so hard for their week or two away I'm certainly not going to judge them on it, most are great people. Indeed, most 'loud' groups are actually nice passengers you just have to keep them in check, get them to tow the line. Occasionally some passengers will complain and often try to pin the blame on the crew. The hardest thing is that tolerances amongst other passengers differs widely, the same goes for crew.

Generally, despite people's perceptions , the problem flights are these long haul sectors where people probably feel the effects more as the flight goes on. Anecdotally, some will tell you that it is also pretty prevalent in the premium cabins aswell.

However, you then get the odd passenger who is 'truly' disruptive and in my experience, this isn't always the Brits.
easyflyer83 is offline  
Old 29th May 2015, 06:27
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 68
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, we wern't there. Two different stories as well. Who to believe?

On a bit of a drift I,ve always thought the infant/lap bady rule should be based on the child's weight, and not it's age. Yes, I know that would be difficult but it's the safety of the child that comes first.
ExXB is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.