man-phl-las
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: stockport uk
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
man-phl-las
some friends and i are in the process of booking a trip to las vegas later this year.
the plan so far is to fly from manchester to philadelphia and onwards to vagas,the problem is assuming we arrive in phl on time the booking form says we have 2 hours 5 mins to transfer onto our connecting flight to vegas which i belive departs from a different terminal.
my arguement is that by the time we have cleared us customs/immigration we will be hard pressed to make our conection ,on our return the transfer time is 1 hour 26mins again i feel that gives us very little leeway.
your thoughts and advice please guy's
many thanks in advance.
all flights will be with us airways.
the plan so far is to fly from manchester to philadelphia and onwards to vagas,the problem is assuming we arrive in phl on time the booking form says we have 2 hours 5 mins to transfer onto our connecting flight to vegas which i belive departs from a different terminal.
my arguement is that by the time we have cleared us customs/immigration we will be hard pressed to make our conection ,on our return the transfer time is 1 hour 26mins again i feel that gives us very little leeway.
your thoughts and advice please guy's
many thanks in advance.
all flights will be with us airways.
Last edited by purplehelmet; 8th Jan 2013 at 13:10.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Either the back of a sim, or wherever Crewing send me.
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Slim chance, especially outbound where you will also have to collect your luggage and re-check-in. However if US Airways are selling it as a through ticket it's their responsibility to get you to your destination, ie they accept liability if their service is late, or the connection just doesn't work. So you could go with that in your back pocket. The only other factor is when you're returning, the next flight is a day later, and US Airways are highly likely to leave you high and dry for the 24 hours, ie accommodation etc is at your expense.
I know everyone goes on about how bad the London airports are, and if you are looking at flights from Manchester I assume you live "up North". However, connections over US hubs can be a bit of a nightmare. I'd seriously consider coming down to London and flying non-stop (which means either BA or Virgin). You could say that transatlantic carriers are in a race for the bottom; the US carriers (all of them) are leading that race right now.
Inbound connections at US hubs mean queuing for immigration, collecting your bags, going through customs, finding check in to hand over your bags again (usually not a major issue - just outside customs), find you way to the next terminal, go through US security (don't buy any duty free liquids or if you do make sure you put it in your luggage before you recheck it) and then find the gate.
Coming home is easier (hence the shorter connecting time) since you don't have to do customs and immigration.
A thought - the fare will almost certainly permit a stop of up to 24 hours at the point where you change planes so you could actually stop in Philadelphia for a night either/each way (at your expense). I did that once coming home from Denver via Chicago and, by getting a flight out of Denver that arrived Chicago after the London flight had departed I got the best part of a day in Chicago.
But in the end I strongly suggest either driving or taking the train to London or even take a connecting flight to London.
Inbound connections at US hubs mean queuing for immigration, collecting your bags, going through customs, finding check in to hand over your bags again (usually not a major issue - just outside customs), find you way to the next terminal, go through US security (don't buy any duty free liquids or if you do make sure you put it in your luggage before you recheck it) and then find the gate.
Coming home is easier (hence the shorter connecting time) since you don't have to do customs and immigration.
A thought - the fare will almost certainly permit a stop of up to 24 hours at the point where you change planes so you could actually stop in Philadelphia for a night either/each way (at your expense). I did that once coming home from Denver via Chicago and, by getting a flight out of Denver that arrived Chicago after the London flight had departed I got the best part of a day in Chicago.
But in the end I strongly suggest either driving or taking the train to London or even take a connecting flight to London.
I would agree with Hartington. You will also get somewhat better service on BA or Virgin or Air France or Lufthansa (well, not always with them) than you will from any of the US carriers. DO NOT use a BA flight that is a code share with American Airlines, though.
My suggestion would be BA to Phoenix, as immigration there is usually pretty quick, unlike Chicago, New York, Miami, etc. Then drive or take South West or failing them, US AIR to LAS
My suggestion would be BA to Phoenix, as immigration there is usually pretty quick, unlike Chicago, New York, Miami, etc. Then drive or take South West or failing them, US AIR to LAS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
to be fair it rarely takes over an hour at most US airports to get through Immigration - everyone has a horror story - normally involving Miami, JFK and worst of all LA
last few times I had two under 10 minutes and one around 50 minutes inbound
Outbound is relatively easy
last few times I had two under 10 minutes and one around 50 minutes inbound
Outbound is relatively easy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: stockport uk
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for the replys.
in response. i did mention to the group about going via lhr/gat but was out voted as we only live 15mins from man in a taxi.(i know). also virgin dont have flights on the dates we want to travel, the price with us airways is a lot cheaper than any other flights we have seen.
its good to know that it is doable,but im still a bit unsure.
in response. i did mention to the group about going via lhr/gat but was out voted as we only live 15mins from man in a taxi.(i know). also virgin dont have flights on the dates we want to travel, the price with us airways is a lot cheaper than any other flights we have seen.
its good to know that it is doable,but im still a bit unsure.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ireland
Age: 52
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Consider via DUB?
It might seems a bit off the wall, but could you route via DUB to avail of the USCBP per clearance? That way there is no need to collect and recheck bags in PHL and immigration is completed before you arrive in the USA.
Ignore the doom mongers extolling the virtues of LHR.
MAN has very good connections to the USA.
United to DHW and EWR (Daily)
US Airways to PHL (Daily)
American Airways to JFK and ORD (Daily)
Virgin Atlantic to LAS (Not very often)
Support your local airport and it will flourish.
MAN has very good connections to the USA.
United to DHW and EWR (Daily)
US Airways to PHL (Daily)
American Airways to JFK and ORD (Daily)
Virgin Atlantic to LAS (Not very often)
Support your local airport and it will flourish.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Either the back of a sim, or wherever Crewing send me.
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
As long as the tickets are bought as a single journey, then you are safe as the airline will re-book you on the next available flight.
Don't worry
Don't worry
if you miss the inbound flight from PHL to MAN.In that case would the fare be cheaper than going via London, Amsterdam etc?
Try skyscanner.net for a variety of options and fares
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the flightpath
Age: 61
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, try the Dublin option sometime when heading over the Pond. The pre-clearance of US immigration means you arrive in the USA as a domestic passenger, and will therefore have more time to make a connection. Although several US airlines fly from Dublin, I'd avoid all of them; Aer Lingus is OK, but will only take you to Boston, Chicago or JFK. From Manchester, I'd take the Virgin direct service.
I hope you enjoy your trip to Las Vegas. I went there once and was quite amazed and astounded by it. People talk about culture shock when travelling in India or China; but Las Vegas was so far removed from reality - even by US standards - that it was like being on another planet. I'm glad I went, but don't think I'll need to repeat the experience. You can eat really cheaply (and plentifully) in the casino restaurants.
I hope you enjoy your trip to Las Vegas. I went there once and was quite amazed and astounded by it. People talk about culture shock when travelling in India or China; but Las Vegas was so far removed from reality - even by US standards - that it was like being on another planet. I'm glad I went, but don't think I'll need to repeat the experience. You can eat really cheaply (and plentifully) in the casino restaurants.
I have connected in Eastern USA many (prob 40/50?) times, and only missed one connecting flight, and that was a couple of weeks after 9/11, and the US hubs were in understandable dissaray.
It is certainly cheaper than going direct, in most cases, and can make a big difference in total cost when travelling with a large family or group of friends.
Inbound, no problems, your bags are checked through to UK, and you only have to travel from one gate to another. Outbound you have to queue at immigration at the US hub, this can take 10 minutes or 90 depending on which hub, amount of staff on duty, amount of international flights arriving at the same time etc. You then collect your bags from the carousel, go through US customs and hand in one form (normally no or little wait). You do not have to go to check in, just drop your bags at a transfer drop off point, normally right outside customs, and then go back through security to the gate for your US domestic flight. When you arrive at Las Vegas, you are a domestic customer, so just collect your bag and go and lose some money!
So, if cost is not an issue, yes, it is better to go direct. But don`t be put off by some of the stories about what can go wrong, in my experience it hardly ever does, and I have saved 10s of thousands of pounds over the years with 6 of us regularly travelling together.
Good luck, Vegas is certainly an interesting place.
It is certainly cheaper than going direct, in most cases, and can make a big difference in total cost when travelling with a large family or group of friends.
Inbound, no problems, your bags are checked through to UK, and you only have to travel from one gate to another. Outbound you have to queue at immigration at the US hub, this can take 10 minutes or 90 depending on which hub, amount of staff on duty, amount of international flights arriving at the same time etc. You then collect your bags from the carousel, go through US customs and hand in one form (normally no or little wait). You do not have to go to check in, just drop your bags at a transfer drop off point, normally right outside customs, and then go back through security to the gate for your US domestic flight. When you arrive at Las Vegas, you are a domestic customer, so just collect your bag and go and lose some money!
So, if cost is not an issue, yes, it is better to go direct. But don`t be put off by some of the stories about what can go wrong, in my experience it hardly ever does, and I have saved 10s of thousands of pounds over the years with 6 of us regularly travelling together.
Good luck, Vegas is certainly an interesting place.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hazel Grove, Stockport
Age: 83
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Havedone this route a couple of times, though not to LAS. Last time arrived at PHL 30 minutes early and was through Immigration and Customs, got my hire car(was Fly Drive this time) and on the I 95 before the scheduled arrival time. Found the staff in PHL were very organised when you enter the Immigration Hall and allocate you a line to get in.
As said previously, forget the doomsayers on here, you will be OK subject to normal operating methods and normal weather etc.
As said previously, forget the doomsayers on here, you will be OK subject to normal operating methods and normal weather etc.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been "out of the loop" for a few years but there always used to be a "minimum connecting time". This would vary depending on certain situations such as if it was the same carrier, changing terminals where applicable etc. You will have to clear US customs at the first point of arrival of course.
Its well worth considering transferring at IAD if possible, as there are separate immigration desks for transfer passengers in, if memory serves me right, Terminal B. As a regular connector from LHR through IAD, I don't think I've ever spent more than 30 mins from deplaning to rechecking bags post-immigration.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: stockport uk
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for all reply's plus all the tips and advice guys.
the trip has been booked man-phl. phl-las.
@ johnny f@rt pants we booked via the company you mentioned as they were a good deal cheaper than the others we looked at,so cheers for that i owe you a drink
once again thanks all.
ph.
viva las vegas
the trip has been booked man-phl. phl-las.
@ johnny f@rt pants we booked via the company you mentioned as they were a good deal cheaper than the others we looked at,so cheers for that i owe you a drink
once again thanks all.
ph.
viva las vegas
