BA Strike - Your Thoughts & Questions II
Join Date: May 2010
Location: middle earth
Age: 60
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would disagree with your classifications, mine would be;
CC BASSA hardliners..yes (will do whatever they want regardless of consequence)
CC BASSA sheep..yes (will do whatever BASSA tells them)
CC BASSA timid..yes ( too scared to do anything)
CC BASSA Realist...yes (definately in the minority)
CC Realist.. Backing BA
But your comments regarding PCCC are spot on imo.
CC BASSA hardliners..yes (will do whatever they want regardless of consequence)
CC BASSA sheep..yes (will do whatever BASSA tells them)
CC BASSA timid..yes ( too scared to do anything)
CC BASSA Realist...yes (definately in the minority)
CC Realist.. Backing BA
But your comments regarding PCCC are spot on imo.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
johno,
I have spent over 20 years flying as crew and the one thing I do know is that pax expect those in charge of them to be able to stand up and confidently take the lead when things go wrong.
From what I have read, and again this may well be seen as a sweeping generalisation there are vast numbers of BA CC who are frightened fartless of even going to work during a strike and upsetting their friends, hence the taxi's, travel out of uniform, escorts in and out of buildings etc etc policies. CC who sit in their rooms down route for fear of causing offence, who are frightened to own up to other crew members about the fact they do not support the strike and the list goes on.
Imagine how this must read for the travelling public.
I have read some very emotive posts from those at the head of the PCCC and I am in agreement with what they stand for. But I am of the opinion that they should have put their heads above the parapet quite some time ago to show the BASSA hardliners that the fight is really on and to re establish the confidence of the travelling public that they are being cared for by capable people and not shrinking violets.
I have spent over 20 years flying as crew and the one thing I do know is that pax expect those in charge of them to be able to stand up and confidently take the lead when things go wrong.
From what I have read, and again this may well be seen as a sweeping generalisation there are vast numbers of BA CC who are frightened fartless of even going to work during a strike and upsetting their friends, hence the taxi's, travel out of uniform, escorts in and out of buildings etc etc policies. CC who sit in their rooms down route for fear of causing offence, who are frightened to own up to other crew members about the fact they do not support the strike and the list goes on.
Imagine how this must read for the travelling public.
I have read some very emotive posts from those at the head of the PCCC and I am in agreement with what they stand for. But I am of the opinion that they should have put their heads above the parapet quite some time ago to show the BASSA hardliners that the fight is really on and to re establish the confidence of the travelling public that they are being cared for by capable people and not shrinking violets.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When questioned regarding continued payments to the union i would look astonished and outraged." I never noticed, im gonna ring them immediately and put a flea in their ear". If questioned regarding the apparent lack of communication indicating a desire to remove myself from the union. I would firmly explain the phone call, email, letter of such and such date was sufficient and if they couldn't find it or didn't act on it, well, it sort of reinforces my reasons for leaving such a shambolic union. Of course if not questioned I would find it prudent to "discover my continued membership" and inform the union toot sweet .
The membership administration is a total mess, it has to be.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Neptunus Rex
100 Academics
On that other forum, the current Bassa troll is claiming the "support of 100 academics," railing about Union busting.
Academics? Many young folk espouse Socialist ideals, then, as life experience grows, become more practical. The cloistered academic, with no real experience of life outside academe, does not mature in quite the same way.
One wonders how many of these Dons with unsaleable degrees will soon be be forced out into the real world for the first time in their lives?
On that other forum, the current Bassa troll is claiming the "support of 100 academics," railing about Union busting.
Academics? Many young folk espouse Socialist ideals, then, as life experience grows, become more practical. The cloistered academic, with no real experience of life outside academe, does not mature in quite the same way.
One wonders how many of these Dons with unsaleable degrees will soon be be forced out into the real world for the first time in their lives?
I seem to remember that at the time someone analysed the background of the "academics" and all were left wing and/or ex trade union or sponsored by trade unions.
A flawed cross section ???
BASSA spin again.....
I've been away for a week, but it seems not much has changed 
The latest BASSA incarnation on the main thread spouts the same old nonsense such as this strike is all the fault of Willie & the Pilots etc, while ignoring factual posts that expose the flaws in their arguments.
Meanwhile, it seems that about half of the cabin crew members in BASSA seemingly don't have an opinion on the most important decision they have yet to make in their career.
One wonders what Unite will make of the results. Surely they will advise BASSA of the folly of further IA given the very real risk of dismissal for their members and the virtual certainty that further IA will be ineffective in any event. But will BASSA listen to reason? I very much doubt it.
The latest BASSA incarnation on the main thread spouts the same old nonsense such as this strike is all the fault of Willie & the Pilots etc, while ignoring factual posts that expose the flaws in their arguments.
Meanwhile, it seems that about half of the cabin crew members in BASSA seemingly don't have an opinion on the most important decision they have yet to make in their career.
One wonders what Unite will make of the results. Surely they will advise BASSA of the folly of further IA given the very real risk of dismissal for their members and the virtual certainty that further IA will be ineffective in any event. But will BASSA listen to reason? I very much doubt it.
Still flying with BA - there's support!
I find it interesting that a number of posters have commented on here that they have long haul flights booked with BA, and so far, all have expressed the wish to fly on a strike day.
Does anyone who has a long haul BA flight booked want to fly on a non-stiking day? If yes, would you explain why?
PS - JSL, GG et al - note that my next l/h is with BA...........
Does anyone who has a long haul BA flight booked want to fly on a non-stiking day? If yes, would you explain why?
PS - JSL, GG et al - note that my next l/h is with BA...........
Lessons from history
After lurking on this thread and the other one from the beginning, here’s my two-pennyworth, based on 35 years in BA, most of it with a BALPA position and part of the time with a management hat, though nearly all on the technical side.
BA’s CC always seemed to be the worst managed bit of the airline, and what’s happening now looks like the last act in a drama that started 50 years ago. Back in the 60s and 70s CC had a lot of ex-liner stewards in senior positions and the advent of the 747 provided the opportunity to push for increased status: “there are now so many cabin crew needed they have to have a full-time manager on board”. The position of Cabin Service DIRECTOR was created with this in mind, analogous to the Cruise Director on a large liner who is responsible for all the in-board entertainment, catering, entertainment etc. for thousands of people for weeks at a time. Such a person might even have an “office” under the stairs, but certainly wouldn't personally serve meals! CC management even tried to get this position of “Cabin Captain” recognised as second-in-command of the aircraft. Needless to say this created a reaction from flight ops and BALPA. It was firmly rebuffed but the trend was started whereby CC unions and management colluded to overstate the role of CC especially CSDs.
Many CC managers also seemed to love to micro-manage everyone below them, so like scheduling systems which give most crew little control over their own lives. The sickness rate in CC is well known to be grossly inflated by “social sickness”, which is simply individual CC taking back control of when they work and more importantly when they don’t. This causes instability and inflates the headcount with standbys, When standby is incorporated in lines of rostered flying, if the standby is used it can cause further instability by knocking out later trips. So you need more standby crew….
That same system was used for pilots in the 60s and early 70s, and the sickness rate improvement and overall satisfaction when a bidding system was introduced was remarkable. When CC strikes were called in the past and massive disruption resulted, it was nearly all due to “sickness” not striking. During one such period of unrest I made this point to a senior CC manager, who just said most CC weren’t “mature enough” to be trusted with a preferential bidding system. Of course the senior union reps and their supporters were happy with the existing system too, as they found ways to make things satisfactory for themselves, and over the years the CSD position in particular accrued significant benefits way above the reality of the responsibility involved.
Adding to this internal empire-building conspiracy between management and union reps was of course the increasing emphasis on the central importance of CC as the employees with the maximum exposure to passengers. While true up to a point, for some, in their own minds, it meant that they above all others ARE the airline. The most militant CC seem to be people who have largely been brought up in that culture of over-inflated self-esteem.
Meanwhile, newer generations of CC recruits have different ideas about what their role can and should be in the cut-throat economics of the 21st century. But they have been treated like badly-brought up children, often praised but given no responsibility. Confused by a continuous stream of half-truths from their “leaders” who mostly have a different agenda entirely, they don’t know what to think and so don’t even vote in potentially career-changing ballots.
They are not helped by the fact that many of the more militant ones seem not to be even fully devoted to the career they profess to be defending. I would question the right of a 50% worker’s vote to strike carrying equal weight with that of a full-time worker – after all they have a 50% less chance of being required to follow through by refusing to report on a strike day, and have less to lose than a full-timer if things go wrong (as they have in the current situation). As for using deliberate disruption of long-planned and hard earned trips of passengers as a weapon to re-institute the ability to get to the head of the queue while commuting to a part-time job from another continent using a non-contractual “perk” – words fail me!
The end result seems to be that BA has finally determined to get a grasp on the nettle that it needs to uproot. It grew largely a result of its own actions many years ago. It cannot afford to, and will not let it re-root. Hopefully a new and less inward-looking CC management team can find more truly representative union people to deal with in future. For BASSA, it looks like the game is over.
BA’s CC always seemed to be the worst managed bit of the airline, and what’s happening now looks like the last act in a drama that started 50 years ago. Back in the 60s and 70s CC had a lot of ex-liner stewards in senior positions and the advent of the 747 provided the opportunity to push for increased status: “there are now so many cabin crew needed they have to have a full-time manager on board”. The position of Cabin Service DIRECTOR was created with this in mind, analogous to the Cruise Director on a large liner who is responsible for all the in-board entertainment, catering, entertainment etc. for thousands of people for weeks at a time. Such a person might even have an “office” under the stairs, but certainly wouldn't personally serve meals! CC management even tried to get this position of “Cabin Captain” recognised as second-in-command of the aircraft. Needless to say this created a reaction from flight ops and BALPA. It was firmly rebuffed but the trend was started whereby CC unions and management colluded to overstate the role of CC especially CSDs.
Many CC managers also seemed to love to micro-manage everyone below them, so like scheduling systems which give most crew little control over their own lives. The sickness rate in CC is well known to be grossly inflated by “social sickness”, which is simply individual CC taking back control of when they work and more importantly when they don’t. This causes instability and inflates the headcount with standbys, When standby is incorporated in lines of rostered flying, if the standby is used it can cause further instability by knocking out later trips. So you need more standby crew….
That same system was used for pilots in the 60s and early 70s, and the sickness rate improvement and overall satisfaction when a bidding system was introduced was remarkable. When CC strikes were called in the past and massive disruption resulted, it was nearly all due to “sickness” not striking. During one such period of unrest I made this point to a senior CC manager, who just said most CC weren’t “mature enough” to be trusted with a preferential bidding system. Of course the senior union reps and their supporters were happy with the existing system too, as they found ways to make things satisfactory for themselves, and over the years the CSD position in particular accrued significant benefits way above the reality of the responsibility involved.
Adding to this internal empire-building conspiracy between management and union reps was of course the increasing emphasis on the central importance of CC as the employees with the maximum exposure to passengers. While true up to a point, for some, in their own minds, it meant that they above all others ARE the airline. The most militant CC seem to be people who have largely been brought up in that culture of over-inflated self-esteem.
Meanwhile, newer generations of CC recruits have different ideas about what their role can and should be in the cut-throat economics of the 21st century. But they have been treated like badly-brought up children, often praised but given no responsibility. Confused by a continuous stream of half-truths from their “leaders” who mostly have a different agenda entirely, they don’t know what to think and so don’t even vote in potentially career-changing ballots.
They are not helped by the fact that many of the more militant ones seem not to be even fully devoted to the career they profess to be defending. I would question the right of a 50% worker’s vote to strike carrying equal weight with that of a full-time worker – after all they have a 50% less chance of being required to follow through by refusing to report on a strike day, and have less to lose than a full-timer if things go wrong (as they have in the current situation). As for using deliberate disruption of long-planned and hard earned trips of passengers as a weapon to re-institute the ability to get to the head of the queue while commuting to a part-time job from another continent using a non-contractual “perk” – words fail me!
The end result seems to be that BA has finally determined to get a grasp on the nettle that it needs to uproot. It grew largely a result of its own actions many years ago. It cannot afford to, and will not let it re-root. Hopefully a new and less inward-looking CC management team can find more truly representative union people to deal with in future. For BASSA, it looks like the game is over.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
slast
I broadly support your post. Although from a different background to yours I shared roughly the same time with the "firm" One of your comments did strike a chord with me. Namely that part time CC whether 75%, 50% or lately on 30% rosters have the same weighting as full time staff when it comes to balloting. Many of these folk are frankly "hobby jobbers" with little commitment in my opinion to the fortunes of the airline going forward. Is it really democratic that part-time staff should have such sway in a ballot? Does any one out there no what proportion of the 12,000+ headcount are genuinely full time? After all a disproptionate ratio of part-timers is also a cost to the company. Think of the additional mandatory training, uniforms, admin etc... Employment legislation probably accounts for some of this but has BA been too generous in allowing CC to switch to reduced hours contracts?
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have seen plenty of references to BA being able to fly 100% of longhaul flights during the next strike (if there is one). Does anyone know about shorthaul? We are booked LHR to Bordeaux on August 14th (long-awaited family holiday, all the usual stuff) - does anyone fancy my chances of getting there if it falls on a strike day?
Junior trash
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have seen plenty of references to BA being able to fly 100% of longhaul flights during the next strike (if there is one). Does anyone know about shorthaul? We are booked LHR to Bordeaux on August 14th (long-awaited family holiday, all the usual stuff) - does anyone fancy my chances of getting there if it falls on a strike day?
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bucks
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Travelling on strike days
Hi Octopussy,
I have now traveled short-haul 3 times on strike days - twice to Newcastle and once to Geneva. On all occasions I got there with no problems!! I did have to retain flexibility as there were definitely quite a few cancellations but BA allow you to change your flights if they happen to fall on strike days so you just change to a flight that IS running. The plus was that some people had obviously not traveled so the airport was a bit quieter and the staff were excellent (I assume that these are the ones who are keen to promote the company rather than destroy it!!) so the onboard service was great though the flights were pretty full!! Hope that reassures you,. I think it is important that we regular customers don't desert BA and allow BASSA and people like the guy now posting absolute rubbish on the other forum (Duggie) to even vaguely think that they have managed to put us off!!
I have now traveled short-haul 3 times on strike days - twice to Newcastle and once to Geneva. On all occasions I got there with no problems!! I did have to retain flexibility as there were definitely quite a few cancellations but BA allow you to change your flights if they happen to fall on strike days so you just change to a flight that IS running. The plus was that some people had obviously not traveled so the airport was a bit quieter and the staff were excellent (I assume that these are the ones who are keen to promote the company rather than destroy it!!) so the onboard service was great though the flights were pretty full!! Hope that reassures you,. I think it is important that we regular customers don't desert BA and allow BASSA and people like the guy now posting absolute rubbish on the other forum (Duggie) to even vaguely think that they have managed to put us off!!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pembrokeshire UK
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
slast You have summed up the situation perfectly. I spent 25 years flying as an Engineer Officer on B707s & B747s and observed the CC empire evolve as you describe. IMO the BASSA hardliners and all the CSDs should go, and the CC empire needs to be brought into the rest of BA. I believe WW has the balls to do it and the sooner the better for all of us, pax and ex crew.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kirkcaldy
Age: 76
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wish some CC and especially BASSA strike staff would visit here
Yes pay us a visit just to get a heads up, of what is out here in the real world
There are almost 3 Million unemployed
Companies can pick and choose like never before
If you wear the leppers badge ex BA CREW, not much chance, other airlines would not touch you with a barge pole (not that you would wish to work for poorer conditions off course)
So what does it leave
Well you can not take the desperate for cash to pay the mortgage route of crop picking as employers prefer the hard working willing to accept min wage immigrant workers
So that is out
Even bar work, employers would take ex barstaff as already aquainted with the life rather than new staff to the trade
OK desperation go to CONTACT CENTRE AS PHONE ADVISOR Sorry no
Although you just have to answer the phone and read scripts from a screen
there are so many out of work UNI GRADS 2.1 Who prefer it to shift work flipping burgers, that the usual pick of office staff are bottom of the heap
Ah HOSPITALITY manager, sorry there are dozens already looking for employment, the employer will take the ex Cruise Director to the CCD
From an airline (err lets make a decission here both inteligent but one manages twelve crew the other 2000 damn its hard)
Menial jobs, they will not take get up and go inteligent types because
Well they will get up and go (If they find something else BIG IF)
We all want the best in life, and to defend it, but in the present climes
CC you need to take a long hard look, and be thankful for what you have or even a reduction in it
"For exercise" "For exercise" "For exercise"
Next time you are off, Just pop into a JOB CENTRE and peruse what is on offer,, that is if you can stand the smell, the crush, and the desperate for work
HEY you will go back to BA and offer to work for free food only
The big benefits, live good for nothing, is only for people that have NEVER Worked
The ex worker has to suffer Two years of hardship and be down to NOTHING (including the loss of the home) before any reasonable help will appear
I am an erk in an office, now my peers are all UNI 2.1 GRADS, since 2008
It used to be two bit secretarys
I do not know WHY I posted this heads up because I much prefer the flights on strike days, and the airline would be better off without the militants
I posted it because I do not wish to see my fellow man in destitution
Jack McH
There are almost 3 Million unemployed
Companies can pick and choose like never before
If you wear the leppers badge ex BA CREW, not much chance, other airlines would not touch you with a barge pole (not that you would wish to work for poorer conditions off course)
So what does it leave
Well you can not take the desperate for cash to pay the mortgage route of crop picking as employers prefer the hard working willing to accept min wage immigrant workers
So that is out
Even bar work, employers would take ex barstaff as already aquainted with the life rather than new staff to the trade
OK desperation go to CONTACT CENTRE AS PHONE ADVISOR Sorry no
Although you just have to answer the phone and read scripts from a screen
there are so many out of work UNI GRADS 2.1 Who prefer it to shift work flipping burgers, that the usual pick of office staff are bottom of the heap
Ah HOSPITALITY manager, sorry there are dozens already looking for employment, the employer will take the ex Cruise Director to the CCD
From an airline (err lets make a decission here both inteligent but one manages twelve crew the other 2000 damn its hard)
Menial jobs, they will not take get up and go inteligent types because
Well they will get up and go (If they find something else BIG IF)
We all want the best in life, and to defend it, but in the present climes
CC you need to take a long hard look, and be thankful for what you have or even a reduction in it
"For exercise" "For exercise" "For exercise"
Next time you are off, Just pop into a JOB CENTRE and peruse what is on offer,, that is if you can stand the smell, the crush, and the desperate for work
HEY you will go back to BA and offer to work for free food only
The big benefits, live good for nothing, is only for people that have NEVER Worked
The ex worker has to suffer Two years of hardship and be down to NOTHING (including the loss of the home) before any reasonable help will appear
I am an erk in an office, now my peers are all UNI 2.1 GRADS, since 2008
It used to be two bit secretarys
I do not know WHY I posted this heads up because I much prefer the flights on strike days, and the airline would be better off without the militants
I posted it because I do not wish to see my fellow man in destitution
Jack McH
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 82
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The PCCC should put their heads up and lead !!!!
In the past few posts, there have been calls for the founders of the PCCC to stand up and put their heads up above the parapets, lead from the front and provide an example to the rest of the CC.
In a situation, where from comments made, we are given to understand that there are possible criminal prosecutions and dismissals for intimidation, threats of damage to property, threats to individuals, families and children, threatening behaviour at strike meetings, and the type of intimidating behaviour as seen by the mob intrusion at the ACAS meeting, would you prospective leaders care to take on the position of being the nominated individuals at the forefront of the nascent PCCC organisation. This will allow those involved to continue to work, without for example worrying about their families, especially if on L/H for a 4 day trip, never mind working relationships within a crew including militants/strikers.
It is all very well using the military dictum of leading from the front, when you have a totally secured base to operate from, full security, organisation and backup, but these things take time to put into being, and until then everything gained to date can be easily destroyed. If you read back on the posting on both threads, the thing that crops up regularly is a troll or construct popping up with a demand to know who are the names behind the PCCC, to date nobody has provided any details and when you don't know who the enemy are, you can't try to destroy them - which I would guess has and is causing a lot of frustration in BASSA - long may it last!!
In a situation, where from comments made, we are given to understand that there are possible criminal prosecutions and dismissals for intimidation, threats of damage to property, threats to individuals, families and children, threatening behaviour at strike meetings, and the type of intimidating behaviour as seen by the mob intrusion at the ACAS meeting, would you prospective leaders care to take on the position of being the nominated individuals at the forefront of the nascent PCCC organisation. This will allow those involved to continue to work, without for example worrying about their families, especially if on L/H for a 4 day trip, never mind working relationships within a crew including militants/strikers.
It is all very well using the military dictum of leading from the front, when you have a totally secured base to operate from, full security, organisation and backup, but these things take time to put into being, and until then everything gained to date can be easily destroyed. If you read back on the posting on both threads, the thing that crops up regularly is a troll or construct popping up with a demand to know who are the names behind the PCCC, to date nobody has provided any details and when you don't know who the enemy are, you can't try to destroy them - which I would guess has and is causing a lot of frustration in BASSA - long may it last!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Folks
We can't ban Duggie Fashion (as several of you have requested) simply because his/her views are in opposition to the consensus on this thread, or because those views are expressed in an immature and irritating manner.
The way to deal with this is either to ignore, or to rebut with facts. The odds are that you will never change this persons' mind - it's probably best not to try: However, in posting facts rather than outrage, you may help convince others. Not everybody who reads this thread contributes, many just lurk.
This thread would be a dull place if everybody who argues against the consensus was driven away - maybe you can learn from it?
We can't ban Duggie Fashion (as several of you have requested) simply because his/her views are in opposition to the consensus on this thread, or because those views are expressed in an immature and irritating manner.
The way to deal with this is either to ignore, or to rebut with facts. The odds are that you will never change this persons' mind - it's probably best not to try: However, in posting facts rather than outrage, you may help convince others. Not everybody who reads this thread contributes, many just lurk.
This thread would be a dull place if everybody who argues against the consensus was driven away - maybe you can learn from it?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Dubai
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PCCC
This is their opportunity....BASSA in disarray and hugely disillusioned at the turnout - half their members or so, didnt vote.
Maybe those half that didnt vote are looking for something to replace Bassa, but can't find it yet as PCCC is invisible to them, so abstain?
DH's memos contain some interesting pschology - his memos read like memo's to children.....right now there are 5000 children who are disullutioned by their father figure, but have no-one to replace him, so they abstain in the ballot as they don't know what else to do.....they are yours for the taking....
So, Hiflyer and the rest of the PCCC, you have a unique window of opportunity to give those children a new figurehead and gain the 5000 or so members you need to be recognised.
Get out from hiding - launch and grab those members - the time is now...
If you delay those 5000 will just abstain again in an IA ballot and secure their own fates...and you'll never get the % of members you need for recognition....
Maybe those half that didnt vote are looking for something to replace Bassa, but can't find it yet as PCCC is invisible to them, so abstain?
DH's memos contain some interesting pschology - his memos read like memo's to children.....right now there are 5000 children who are disullutioned by their father figure, but have no-one to replace him, so they abstain in the ballot as they don't know what else to do.....they are yours for the taking....
So, Hiflyer and the rest of the PCCC, you have a unique window of opportunity to give those children a new figurehead and gain the 5000 or so members you need to be recognised.
Get out from hiding - launch and grab those members - the time is now...
If you delay those 5000 will just abstain again in an IA ballot and secure their own fates...and you'll never get the % of members you need for recognition....
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Litebulbs.
Some do, then the pack hunt starts if they post an opinion against the thread bias. Then they are reported and a thread ban is requested.
To be honest, it has taken me a long time to get the hang of moderation on this forum - so different from my 'home' forum - but I have to say FlapsForty in particular has done and is doing a bang up job in a hostile environment. I don't think Watersidewonker, Fume Event, Ava (the Brit in Saffa) have been banned, even though some of their posts have been vanished. Some of mine have.
They could, if they chose and were all different people, still come back to offer their point of view. But they don't. The problem is and always has been, all the way through the whole eighteen months of forumeering, those like the above do not care to refute arguments put to them by those on this forum. When confronted by verifiable evidence counter to their party line, the reaction is almost always silence or a snappy, but pointless or even incomprehensible one liner. I think I can say with reasonable confidence, I have never seen a carefully constructed, incontestably argued (and properly spelled
) outline of the BASSA case and its reasons for reacting so violently to a situation common to all BA employees.Over the span of this matter, I have noticed how the tenor has changed in response to BASSA actions and proclamations. First, a genuine desire to correct the naff thinking and baseless spin. Then astonishment and confusion at the onset of strikes, followed shortly by growing irritation with BASSA's attitude and now, outright anger at BASSA's very real threat to thirty odd thousand non CC BA staff. And still the cabin crew militants appear to be completely incapable of understanding how others feel about them and the extent of the folly to which they have been led.
ROger.
Last edited by Landroger; 21st Jul 2010 at 23:18. Reason: Replaced with a better word.
Paxing All Over The World
I would like to thank slast VERY much indeed for the historical background. Another poster made reference to the importance of looking forward, and one must, but if you do not know the past, then you cannot improve on it.
It all makes sense of course, we know that the Captain was treated as was the Captain of an ocean liner with an absolute authority that was almost unassailable. That lesson was learnt and now it's called CRM.
It strikes me that, one of the reasons the management of CC got so slack is that, it was CC promoted to manage CC and the inevitable favouritism. Of course, there was then the income to be able to overlook the problems. Now the problems have outgrown all proportion and have to be fixed.
As I have said before, it's not nice and some people will lose out but, if realistic discussion had taken place from the outset? It could have been phased in. But human beings are hard wired to grab everything NOW and let go NEVER. Well, 'never' is just turning off the active and about to taxi up to the gate ...
It all makes sense of course, we know that the Captain was treated as was the Captain of an ocean liner with an absolute authority that was almost unassailable. That lesson was learnt and now it's called CRM.
It strikes me that, one of the reasons the management of CC got so slack is that, it was CC promoted to manage CC and the inevitable favouritism. Of course, there was then the income to be able to overlook the problems. Now the problems have outgrown all proportion and have to be fixed.
As I have said before, it's not nice and some people will lose out but, if realistic discussion had taken place from the outset? It could have been phased in. But human beings are hard wired to grab everything NOW and let go NEVER. Well, 'never' is just turning off the active and about to taxi up to the gate ...
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Age: 56
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm about to book our annual trip to Hong Kong. I've been there five times now and flown with BA three times, Qantas once and Cathay once (last year). As a BA silver card holder ordinarily BA would be my default choice. But here's the text of the email I just sent to my wife's family:
Striking cabin crew: all over Britain, and BA's destinations worldwide, people are sending similar emails and avoiding booking with your airline, threatening its future and with it your jobs and those of thousands of your colleagues.
Regardless of what your union says, this is the reality. Do you care ?
In 20 years will you proudly be telling your children that you helped destroy an airline ?
13Alpha
OK let's go for a departure on xx/yy/zz then, means the three of us can travel together, hopefully you can come too XXXXX.
I have a BA silver card too but I've more or less given up on them due to their service with a scowl / strikes / their air miles aren't worth much. So I'd prefer to go on Cathay unless it's wildly more expensive. (Cathay also do daytime flights on the way back which is less tiring and you get an extra night in HK)
I have a BA silver card too but I've more or less given up on them due to their service with a scowl / strikes / their air miles aren't worth much. So I'd prefer to go on Cathay unless it's wildly more expensive. (Cathay also do daytime flights on the way back which is less tiring and you get an extra night in HK)
Regardless of what your union says, this is the reality. Do you care ?
In 20 years will you proudly be telling your children that you helped destroy an airline ?
13Alpha