Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Leaky Pressure Hull In Flight

Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Leaky Pressure Hull In Flight

Old 14th Jun 2008, 11:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow
Age: 54
Posts: 24
Leaky Pressure Hull In Flight

Last week my parents were returning to the UK on a 73? when upon reaching cruise altitude the flight crew announced that there was a problem with leaking 'seal'. It seems unclear what the specifics were, however, the word 'seal' appears to have been used. The captain announced that they were able to compensate for the pressure loss and would continue to destination since returning would incur at least a 6 hour delay.

As the flight progressed, the cabin announcements could barely be heard, apparently due to the loudness of the additional pressurization airflow and the first officer appeared in the cabin to re-assure the pax that the problem was under control. (He had to progressively move done the cabin to make himself heard).

As a humble flying instructor who has never flown anything other than light twins, I feel unqualified to comment on the seriousness of this type of problem, but it concerns me enough to solicit remarks on PPRuNe since I fly quite a lot with this airline myself. Intuitively, leaky pressure seals don't seem like something I'd want to be continuing a flight with in a pressurized environment but I'd appreciate any remarks from anyone more qualified.

Many thanks !
indigopete is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 11:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,691
No drama at all. All aircraft leak. Probably just a noisy door seal.
Carnage Matey! is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 11:33
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: .
Posts: 544
As carnage says the aircraft is never fully "plugged" anyway, the outflow valve (does what it says!!) is always open a certain amount. If a door seal leaks the outflow valve will still be open but by a reduced amount therefore controlling the pressurisation. Noisy but safe.
one post only! is online now  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 11:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,914
Noisy door seal trapped when the door was closed and allowing a leakage. The loud noise is distressing loud, but totally irrelevant as far as safety is concerned. It is just a comfort thing, nothing more. It happens very infrequently. Certainly not worth disrupting a flight for when the cure is simply earplugs and a good book! Unless you are willing to open the door yourself and reseal it maybe?
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 11:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the lake
Age: 77
Posts: 661
"totally irrelevant as far as safety is concerned"

Agreed, but not an insignificant cost when the drag penalty of various pressure outflows around the pressure cabin and the extra bleed load on the engines are considered; the incremental fuel burn is not insignificant.
twochai is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 11:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,914
Like I said, just a comfort thing, nothing more! The extra cost of the bleed load and any imagined drag is completely irrelevant. The outflow valve will compensate with reduced release of air. The only implication is noise and comfort, not any safety effect at all. People- don't start making a drama out of nothing! It can be alleviated by putting wet blankets around the leaky area on the door (if you can identify it) in the hope that moisture leaking out will condense and freeze and block the gap. Purely to cut down the noise nuisance. It used to happen regularly on the 747 and was always dealt with that way.
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 12:05
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow
Age: 54
Posts: 24
mind at rest

Many thanks for the responses. I am at ease
indigopete is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 12:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 3,679
The instant answer is usually to stuff wet paper towels around the area of the leak. This usually stops the leak and the noise. Renew the paper towels as necessary until repair can be effected.
JW411 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 12:16
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,114
The instant answer is usually to stuff wet paper towels around the area of the leak. This usually stops the leak and the noise. Renew the paper towels as necessary until repair can be effected.
I don't worry about paper towels, but using pillows or blankets can be problamatic when they disappear.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 12:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,561
When I was flying those old leaky 737's I used my mike in interphone mode to find windshield leaks so maintenance could seal them. It was quite annoying on a six or eight leg day. One day the crew flew from Cancun to LAX at 10,000 feet unpressurised because of a broken door seal with a full airplane with at least one fuel stop. Just the noise from the high IAS must have been awful.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 13:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: CGN, EDDK
Posts: 91
An old MX trick to find a leak during a ground pressure run was to have somebody smoke a cigarette inside the cabin around the suspected area. The smoke would then be drawn to the leak and thus identify it.
MD11Engineer is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 13:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,914
Smoking? Aeroplanes? Heart palpitations! Hidden away in your hangars only please!
But I can see it would work....and let the smokers get 'relief on the job'.
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 13:30
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Flew as pax few years ago in a Northwest Airbus 320 DTW MCO next to a loudly whistling rear toilet. Door secured with duct tape. No explanation given.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 13:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,914
Was it whistling a nice tune?
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 14:04
  #15 (permalink)  

Flashes from the Archives of Oblivion
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 68
Posts: 0
An obscure mental leap (or stumble) to "Whistling Rufus" has just taken place.

but that was a long, long time ago on a very different planet.
El Grifo is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 22:21
  #16 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 63
Posts: 8,868
Wink

Whistlin' Rufus???

I seem to recall having that on a 78RPM disc in a recording by Chris Barber's Jazz Band??? "Flashes from the Archives of Oblivion" Yes!!! that it certainly was. Phew, I'd better go and have a lie down after that memory blast. Or, perhaps I'll see if I can find the 78s ...

PAXboy is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2008, 23:57
  #17 (permalink)  

Flashes from the Archives of Oblivion
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 68
Posts: 0
The very fellow indeed !!!

Have a little lie down and a stiff single malt, after which, you will be as right as rain

Happy Daze

El G.
El Grifo is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2008, 07:34
  #18 (permalink)  

You Think, Therefore I Am
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 60
Posts: 3,587
Confession time...

Decades ago, in a galaxy far, far away... 737-200 with a faulty door seal at rear left: Howled like a banshee during climb, then settled to a shriek during cruise on our first, outbound sector. Unsurprisingly, customers at rear went nuts - who wouldn't? Tricky sector for us FA's.

The prospect of the return, inbound sector filled us all with some dread - and then a party of 30 deaf customers checked-in and were promptly allocated the back rows. The inbound sector passed without significant comment, apart from the toilet queue.

It was a practical solution to a problem: It worked and nobody got hurt - and to this day I feel uncomfortable about it.





TightSlot is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2008, 08:48
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
In a general sense only, in line with what "NotsoFantastic" mentioned, the outflow valve(s) will be noticed to be a higher percentage closed in cruise flight with a higher percentage of pressure hull leakage.
And therefore the airplanes capability to maintain differential with only one pack operating, or conversly, with no packs, the time the cabin will take to reach 10,000 feet, from the approximately 8,200 feet at cruise.

Cheers...FD...
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2008, 18:11
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: leafy suburbs
Posts: 308
I say BRING BACK SMOKING ON AIRCRAFT. It is easy to see leaks with the nicotine trail.
keel beam is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.