Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

When Will It Get Light?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Dec 2007, 10:46
  #1 (permalink)  

Nice
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: All Over
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When Will It Get Light?

Bit of an odd question, but I'm taking the 18.40 BA LHR-HKG in a few weeks and just wondered at what point in the journey can I expect to see some sunshine?

Cheers y'all
Paracab is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 11:57
  #2 (permalink)  

Life's too short for ironing
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scotland, & Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you get away from the rainy UK
fernytickles is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 12:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The flight arrives in HKG at 14:40 local time the next afternoon.

I would imagine that it will start to get light about 6 or maybe 7 hours into the flight (give or take half way there).

Of course the cabin crew may try to stop you raising the blind so that others sleep is not disrupted.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 19:01
  #4 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,145
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Angel

Go to: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html
and then adjust the time in the boxes underneath the map. It will then reload to the date and time in the future, that you requested.

If you set the time to be, say half way through the flight time in hours, then you will get an idea of the daylight pattern. The flight is probably about 14 hours, but it's ten years since I flew that route. Look up departure time and then add 7 hours but have fun adjusting time zones.

A friendly warning, this website (and check out the home page for all of it's World Clock features) can cause you to lose hours of time!!
PAXboy is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 19:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14 hours ... what were you flying in? The QOTS has a 12 hour schedule chox to chox, so likely an 11:30 flight time.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2007, 03:10
  #6 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,145
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
First HKG to LGW was a BA 744 in 1990. Then VS 343 and mainly by the older and slower southerly route. Only once did I do the 'new' northerly route across Russia. But, due to weather diversions, it still took a long time.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2007, 03:52
  #7 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,271
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
Of course the cabin crew may try to stop you raising the blind so that others sleep is not disrupted.
TopBunk,

I would imagine once the 787 gets into service, all flights will unfortunately be in darkness.

I wish I could believe it was for other passengers comfort (they could always wear eye masks) but it does seem that some carriers do this with the sole purpose of allowing the CC to ‘rest’ throughout the flight.
ZFT is online now  
Old 7th Dec 2007, 07:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: BRUSSELS
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The acurate flight time at which you will see the sun is found by integrating the aircaft ground speed, the earth angular speed at the latitude flown at the time of local sunrise and the date (season, that is the earth inclination relative to its orbit plane). We used to do that kind of of navigation execise at school, before the digital computers, JAR-FCL and PPRUNE to do the homework for us I won't give the formula and its solution here, just in case you are one of those trying to skip his homework, but if the question is genuine, then you should see first glimpse of rising sun on the forward right side of the aircraft around 65 deg East, and that would be around 2 AM London time, 10 AM Hong Kong time.
Lemper is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2007, 08:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it does seem that some carriers do this with the sole purpose of allowing the CC to ‘rest’ throughout the flight.
??? - Is there aany evidence at all to support this?
TightSlot is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2007, 14:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paxboy - I used the CX 747-200 LGW - HKG in May 88 12H30 and returned in July again on CX 747-200 at 13H10 then. Think CX had been running them direct for some while in 1988 - only possible after latest upgrade to the RB211's.
Cremeegg is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2007, 15:08
  #11 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,271
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
TightSlot,

Evidence, no. However personnal experience does seem to justify my comment.
ZFT is online now  
Old 8th Dec 2007, 15:35
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: YPPH
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZFT, there are perfectly good bunks for us to rest in.

From a passenger point of view I would prefer the blinds to be down to provide better contrast to the IFE screen. Also, when blinds go up, other passengers wake up, which causes disturbance when I am trying to sleep. Eye-shades don't really work for me, either.

As crew, I would keep the blinds down for the benefit of the whole cabin. If everyone else is asleep, I would encourage them to be left down. If everyone's awake, then fine.

Your comments on crew rest however are uncalled for. Unless you've done the job, on this route, you can't really comment. This forum is not a place for passengers to have a dig at crew. You have Customer Relations for that.
VS-LHRCSA is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2007, 15:55
  #13 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,145
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
To continue the thread drift in to a conversation we have had before ... the problem with the 787 window 'screens' is that you will not be able (I understand) to open them just a crack. With the sliding screen, you can open it half an inch and then squeeze down in your seat and still enjoy the view.

I gather that when you 'open' the screen on the 787 window, it will be across the full face of it? That means having to drape a blanket over your head to keep the glare from others. IF that is the case, then I think it a retrograde step.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2007, 17:01
  #14 (permalink)  
None but a blockhead
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The flight back can be miserable at this time of year. I just got back from Harry Honkers on BA; from sundown in Shenzhen at 6pm local to dawn in London at around 7:30am local (the flight got in at just past 5am) was getting on for a 21 hour night.

Mind you, it was enlivened by Nigel. We were about an hour late taking off due to two pax not boarding and their baggage getting deplaned, which occasioned a PA from Nige saying "Terribly sorry for this delay. If I had my way, passengers who did this would be lined up against a wall and shot" (much laughter over the PA, short pause in proceedings).

We made up the time: just after we'd done the usual LHR taxithon and got to the stand, another PA from the pointy bit said "And if you look out of the left-hand side of the aircraft you can see that the other BA flight which took off a minute after us from Hong Kong is just landing now. He had a bad hair night, let me tell you."
Self Loading Freight is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 13:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by TightSlot
??? - Is there any evidence at all to support this?
TightSlot

I know you are from the CC side but those of us who are well versed in long-haul on mainstream carriers find that increasingly the crew are conspicuous by their absence for long intervals and feel their duties are confined to the stipulated meal services.

Unfortunately the trend is spreading from the European/North American carriers where it started to others. Only last week I was on Malaysian LHR-KUL (12 hours) where apart from a meal 1 hour after departure and another 1 hour before landing, there was only a periodic service of trays of refreshments. A visit to the galley for a can of drink required parting the curtain to speak to the gossip group and a hostile response from a steward for this temerity.

It is especially hacking-off when in business class and you have paid all that money to find that the crew are mostly in their bunks, presumably to get rested to go off to their "day jobs" once they get home.

This forum is not a place for passengers to have a dig at crew. You have Customer Relations for that.
No, Customer Relations is for sending out asinine word-processed letters that reply to points completely different to any you may have raised in your initial comments.

Suppose I should stand by for incoming now.
WHBM is online now  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 14:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South of France
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A visit to the galley for a can of drink required parting the curtain to speak to the gossip group and a hostile response from a steward for this temerity.
It is irritating... I had exactly the same coming back from Tokyo a couple of weeks ago. Not, it must be said from the Japanese crew (who are always extremely pleasant and friendly) but from the sulky Brits.
As I had just received a letter from Virgin telling me I was not, "at this time on track to renew your valuable PAMS membership", I decided to tell them a few home truths. Firstly, their crews need to get out of the UC galley where they appear to spend time complaining about pay on the way out and laughing and shouting on the way home. Secondly, I don't give a monkeys about PAMS and the reason I'm not on target to reach it is because I've stopped flying with them to North America due to the dreadful service they now offer.
To be fair, the response I had was almost by return and very concerned. It leads me to believe that there is a groundswell of long-time Virgin customers saying enough is enough.
Thread drift? Me? 7 hours.
strake is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 15:04
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Back of beyond
Posts: 793
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
WARNING - THREAD DRIFT!

Back in the days when Ms RevMan was a sandwich mechanic and my mate RWS (later to rise to the heady heights of CEO at EY) was Cargo Ops Manager in VCP, a heated discussion ensued about the logic of ripping out 12 business class seats and replacing them with a Crew Rest Cabin.

Huge loss of revenue on every flight and the people who thought it up should have been shot.

"Do you really believe, Madam" he said (they never did get on too well...)"that your husband goes on a night shift and then goes to bed for 6 hours after working for an hour?"

I'm with WHBM on this one.

It really does tick me off that service drops to RyanAir levels at night, no matter which class you're flying in.

I accept that working long-haul flights stuffs your circadian rhythm and that rest periods are justified and necessary, but at the moment, the pendulum's swinging too far away from where I'm sitting.
RevMan2 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 20:12
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WHBM, ZFT, strake and others - I asked for evidence and you have supplied it - anecdotal maybe, but that's often as good as it gets on PPRuNe.

It is instinctive to try and support others in the same job, but at the same time I'm not going to attempt to defend others doing the job badly - it depresses me, and I like to hope that I wouldn't allow such behaviour on a flight that I was responsible for.
TightSlot is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 23:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I had 11h 15m LHR-HKG, and 13h HKG-LHR airborne times recently with BA.
AircraftOperations is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2007, 06:32
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver
Age: 32
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well,,, not to make you feel disappointed,
but even if there were sunlight,
they wouldn't allow you to raise the blinds,
i remember when i was taking a midnight flight from YVR to HKG
and few hours into the flight, they asked us to pull down the blinds,
but i keep constantly pulling it back up
because at that time i was still a kid and curious to look outside,
but they just kept coming back telling me to keep it down~~ ><
davidc_482 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.