G P S Question Re Operating in Thick Smoke ?
 

Was watching the bushfire reports from SE Aust. and one of the commentators suggested that the responding aircraft may be having trouble with getting continuous GPS reception due smoke....

Is this true?

Can anybody advise whether the smoke particle density actually blocks or hinders the GPS signal from satellites in Space?

Just curious is all.....

Cheers

There was commentary about the thick smoke affecting the HF Marine Band during the recent Sydney to Hobart, so I guess RF interference from the smoke is possible. GPS is an incredibly weak signal after-all, but I'm certainly not an expert.

I wonder if it has anything to do with the same conditions that produce Pyrocumulonimbus and if it's the static build up that causes the lightning also affects GPS?

thick smoke interference
 

Yes loss of signal occurs in thick smoke. Its the intermittent and unpredictable nature of the drop outs that cause problems.

Catseye, honest question here, how does the thick smoke affect the signals? Is it the density of the air and the signal trying to pass through it? or some combination?

There are multiple effects caused by fire that have an effect on electromagnetic signal propagation. Someone wrote a PhD thesis on this: https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/2028/2/02whole.pdf

The gist: Particulate matter attenuates signal (present in smoke), but the larger effects are from the signal refraction due to the thermal bubble created by large fires, as well as the electrically charged particles causing large fluctuations in the electron density of the atmosphere - the same effect that occurs when large solar storms hit the earth, although with these the electron density in the near space region (above the atmosphere) is affected.

So yes, this is perfectly conceivable and real!

I understand it is the high concentration of carbon in the air. Think carbon rods in arc lamps.

Never had time to consider, usually just trying to remain helo vfr or finding a good hover reference and not running out of gas til the smoke thinned. Similar effect in really heavy fog near fires. No doubt the techheads will have an answer.
The powerlines appearing out of the smoke are a bigger threat

High resolution near cyclones are reported to have a similar effect but managed to avoid that situation.

People with lots of theory saying yes...
But I was in it today - thick enough that I had to put the instrument lights on, and vis at the MDA was less than 200m (I couldn't see any ground features).
There was no apparent effect on the GPS and no conflict reported between the dual receivers.

The effects in the PHD thesis referenced above would tend to be intermittent and localised so possibly even more dangerous since things could appear to be working fine until their not.

Your observation also supports the theory that it is not the density of the smoke but other (mostly thermal induced) factors that would be significant.

Also to disrupt nav signals they would not need to be blocked, just time modulated (via density changes) enough to cause loss of lock.

Thanks Guys / Gals,
Was simply curious - am waay beyond having to rely on such 'new fangled devices'...….

Cheeerrrsss…..

MurphyWasRight Indeed with GNSS signals what matters is the signal path between transmitter and receiver and any path delays induced by hot air pockets (doesn't have to be absolute temperature hot, but the gradient between the cold and hot air regions). This can modify the refractivity index of the air to a sufficient degree so that arrival times of GNSS signals are sufficiently out of phase that signal lock is lost, and the receivers determine that no reliable position can be inferred, hence showing no position (rather than an erroneous one). All part of GNSS fail safe mechanisms.

Cause and effect? The Canberra hospital is unable to use its MRI due to the smoke, wonder how that works.

Inside an air-conditioned hospital building, with its filtered air supply, via the air-con.....

That is almost incredible....
Cheers

Smoke entering the buildings apparently.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/bushfire...tions-to-close