PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   Paying for private flights (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/619704-paying-private-flights.html)

Max Tow 22nd Mar 2019 03:15

Paying for private flights
 
Following the Emilio Sala crash, there's a huge stink in Europe about a blind eye having been turned to PPLs conducting commercial operations in the guise of the cost sharing exemption(see the "Accidents & Near Misses" section for the sorry saga to date).
I was therefore interested when my 8 y.o. son was invited on a $100 club excursion which apparently includes a C172 flight and saw the following: "flying activities carried out by XXX are conducted as a private flying operation and all participants share in the costs." Pardon my perhaps unjustified concern, but what documentation, if any, should I be asking for? Is this any different from buying a trial flight at a flying school?

LeadSled 22nd Mar 2019 04:22


Originally Posted by Max Tow (Post 10426355)
Following the Emilio Sala crash, there's a huge stink in Europe about a blind eye having been turned to PPLs conducting commercial operations in the guise of the cost sharing exemption(see the "Accidents & Near Misses" section for the sorry saga to date).
I was therefore interested when my 8 y.o. son was invited on a $100 club excursion which apparently includes a C172 flight and saw the following: "flying activities carried out by XXX are conducted as a private flying operation and all participants share in the costs." Pardon my perhaps unjustified concern, but what documentation, if any, should I be asking for? Is this any different from buying a trial flight at a flying school?

Max Tow,
Firstly, no, it is nothing like a "trial instructional flight", which would be conducted under an Air Operators Certificate for a flying school.
"Cost sharing" is "legal" but only under defined circumstances, and cost must be shared by all on board, INCLUDING the pilot.
There is a long history of very inventive excuses/schemes to conduct disguised charters as "private flights", this may or may not be one of them, but one thing is certain, there would be no Passenger Liability Insurance in the event of injury or death. Such insurance is mandatory for all passenger operations conducted under an AOC.
In this particular case, much more detail is needed to determine whether the operation was "legal", let alone wise.
CASA (rightly, in my view) take a very dim view of disguised charters ( soon to be Part 135 Air Transport at this level) .which are private operations.
Tootle pip!!

Squawk7700 22nd Mar 2019 04:26

I would not for one minute let my 8 year old son fly in said aircraft under that arrangement.

I would also voice my concerns to the other parents.

I would also advise the school of your displeasure of the arrangement.

I also would also consider contacting CASA and advising them of the details of the arrangement. If they have nothing to hide, then it won’t be an issue!

Too harsh? Probably not, but better to be safe than sorry.

I so wonder how cost sharing works when the pilot takes up say 10 plane loads of kids??? Sounds like someone with a PPL running a holiday farm for kids wanting to give them a thrill in his 172.

My children only fly with a pilot with gold bars, in a registered charter operation or flying school or with someone I trust implicitly.




Max Tow 22nd Mar 2019 05:33

Thanks for the replies. To clarify, which is difficult I appreciate without naming names, the organisation concerned is well regarded, has been taking kids up for years and does hold an AOC. I'm more concerned about the level of qualification required of the pilot to fly kids around as the "private" and cost sharing bits ring alarm bells (possibly unnecessarily) after poor Mr Sala. Even though I remember being scared s...less at the tender age of 14 in a Chipmunk AEF!

LeadSled 22nd Mar 2019 07:33


Originally Posted by Max Tow (Post 10426396)
Thanks for the replies. To clarify, which is difficult I appreciate without naming names, the organisation concerned is well regarded, has been taking kids up for years and does hold an AOC. I'm more concerned about the level of qualification required of the pilot to fly kids around as the "private" and cost sharing bits ring alarm bells (possibly unnecessarily) after poor Mr Sala. Even though I remember being scared s...less at the tender age of 14 in a Chipmunk AEF!

Max Tow,
Something doesn't jell here.
Either it is a private flight, or it is not, what kind of an AOC does this mob have??
If they are saying it is a private flight, cost share, that is NOT under any relevant AOC.
For the pilot, for a private operation, the only CASA qualification is to have a current Private Pilot's License, which means a valid minimum Class 2 medical certificate and recency.
Tootle pip!!

Max Tow 22nd Mar 2019 07:53

LeadSled: PM sent.

Cloudee 22nd Mar 2019 08:17

Cost sharing in the UK is more lax than in the US and Australia. In the UK you can advertise for passengers and the pilot does not have to pay an equal share. https://www.pprune.org/private-flyin...t=Cost+sharing

As this Australian operation is a private operation they can use a pilot with a PPL or RPL, but they can’t advertise for passengers. I’m with Squawk7700 on this, I would not let my kids up in such a case. It would be interesting to know how much of the $100 is for the flight. How many passengers per flight? How long Is the flight? You could then work out the hourly rate they are getting.

Max Tow 22nd Mar 2019 08:32

I think the UK may close that stable door now that the horse has bolted (recent pages by far the most interesting):
https://www.pprune.org/accidents-clo...el-island.html

Advice heeded as ties in with my gut instinct so son is now off the list - I'll make it up to him & he's looking forward to the A380 in a few weeks!

Capt Fathom 22nd Mar 2019 11:36

For God sake, why do we make such a fuss? The kid is going for a fly in a 172 . The most dangerous part of the day will be the drive to the airport!

gerry111 22nd Mar 2019 14:17

Thank goodness my Dad (irresponsibly) allowed me to go flying in GA aircraft. Gliders too! :eek:

Squawk7700 22nd Mar 2019 20:48


Originally Posted by Capt Fathom (Post 10426648)
For God sake, why do we make such a fuss? The kid is going for a fly in a 172 . The most dangerous part of the day will be the drive to the airport!

It’s all well and good until something goes wrong.

What if the pilot was a freshly minted RPL at 18 years old or 75 and has 41 hours total time? Your children aren’t informed passengers... you have to make the decision for them.

Max Tow 22nd Mar 2019 21:29


Originally Posted by Squawk7700 (Post 10427107)


It’s all well and good until something goes wrong.

What if the pilot was a freshly minted RPL at 18 years old or 75 and has 41 hours total time? Your children aren’t informed passengers... you have to make the decision for them..

Perhaps I should add that at the age of 8, my son has almost 200 flights in his logbook, from Eurocopters and Beaver floatplanes through to the 380. I intend that he adds many more, on my terms until he can decide for himself.
Fly Safe!

LeadSled 23rd Mar 2019 00:23


Originally Posted by Squawk7700 (Post 10427107)
It’s all well and good until something goes wrong.
What if the pilot was a freshly minted RPL at 18 years old or 75 and has 41 hours total time? Your children aren’t informed passengers... you have to make the decision for them.

Sadly, how very true.
Some time ago, a private operation, but the pilot was a Regional Captain, the aircraft a private C-172, last flight of the day, of a series of flights at a charity open day.
Bad gust, aircraft wrecked, and the only passenger, a child, permanently disabled.
No insurance cover for TP Personal damage.
The big winners were the lawyer, of course, at the point where I ceased to have any further involvement, the combined legal expenses were already approaching $1.0M, with personal bankruptcy a real prospect for at least one involved, with further damages action ahead.
Tootle pip!!

megan 23rd Mar 2019 00:51

How times change. Used to skydive in the sixties and still have the letter from the regulator giving me approval to fly skydivers as a PPL, didn't pay a dime myself while doing the flying, had to of course if I were jumping. :{

Max Tow 23rd Mar 2019 01:04

Yup, those were the days and I remember the same. Thalidomide babies & a commercial airliner crash every week. I think we've moved on and can still have a lot of fun. By the way, he's an only child so I don't have a spare. Querying paperwork I don't understand has made me long-lived & rich, so I'm happy to be old rather than just bold!

thisishomebrand 23rd Mar 2019 01:22


Originally Posted by Cloudee (Post 10426484)
Cost sharing in the UK is more lax than in the US and Australia. In the UK you can advertise for passengers and the pilot does not have to pay an equal share. https://www.pprune.org/private-flyin...t=Cost+sharing

Under EASA rules, while the UK is still part of them anyway, it’s not permitted for a PPL holder to fly passengers and the pilot not pay equal share. I think if you actually look into the details of the link then it’s highly unlikely that the £67 the passenger paid covered anywhere near the full cost of the flight. Wet rental of Warrior is around £150 per hour so once you add landing fees it will be well in excess of £67 to operate.

There are websites that are used for advertising these kind of flights such as Wingly, but as long as the pilot is paying their fair share they are operating within EASA rules.

Max Tow 23rd Mar 2019 01:48


Originally Posted by thisishomebrand (Post 10427265)


Under EASA rules, while the UK is still part of them anyway, it’s not permitted for a PPL holder to fly passengers and the pilot not pay equal share. I think if you actually look into the details of the link then it’s highly unlikely that the £67 the passenger paid covered anywhere near the full cost of the flight. Wet rental of Warrior is around £150 per hour so once you add landing fees it will be well in excess of £67 to operate.

There are websites that are used for advertising these kind of flights such as Wingly, but as long as the pilot is paying their fair share they are operating within EASA rules.


As you probably already know, & if you look at the pPrune Sala thread linked above, the Malibu was flag-of-convenience N Reg, the pilot was allegedly a heavily indebted PPL, apparently not even licensed to fly at night and there's no published evidence that the he paid anything or was intending to fly the same route/time before any cost-sharing passenger climbed on board (also a requirement under FAA rules). The scenario is fairly obvious, IMHO, and no doubt a lot more will come out of the woodwork.

LeadSled 23rd Mar 2019 06:35


Originally Posted by megan (Post 10427246)
How times change. Used to skydive in the sixties and still have the letter from the regulator giving me approval to fly skydivers as a PPL, didn't pay a dime myself while doing the flying, had to of course if I were jumping. :{

Megan,
You still can fly meatbombs on a PPL in AU, it is a private category operation. No approvals required.
Tootle pip!!

thisishomebrand 23rd Mar 2019 07:55


Originally Posted by Max Tow (Post 10427272)
As you probably already know, & if you look at the pPrune Sala thread linked above, the Malibu was flag-of-convenience N Reg, the pilot was allegedly a heavily indebted PPL, apparently not even licensed to fly at night and there's no published evidence that the he paid anything or was intending to fly the same route/time before any cost-sharing passenger climbed on board (also a requirement under FAA rules). The scenario is fairly obvious, IMHO, and no doubt a lot more will come out of the woodwork.

Yeah it’s defintely less stringent than the US and I agree it’s likely more cases will come out the woodwork, I mean i don’t think every flight on Wingly will be happening regardless of whether passengers sign up.

YPJT 23rd Mar 2019 08:39

Leaddy,
you might not need approval from the regulator but nor can you rock up to the nearest DZ, slap your log book on the desk and say “let me fly”
https://www.apf.com.au/apf-members/a...ot-information


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:01.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.