PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   Mallard Down in Perth (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/590122-mallard-down-perth.html)

601 27th Jan 2017 01:20

I wonder if there was a camera in the aircraft recording the the approach.

B772 27th Jan 2017 01:28

RHLMcG

Definitely not the ex AN Peter Lynch

Dora-9 27th Jan 2017 01:45


Definitely not the ex AN Peter Lynch
The Quiet Achiever would be in his mid 70's by now.

Desert Flower 27th Jan 2017 04:18

https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/crash...-ng-b88367981z

Handswing 27th Jan 2017 04:52

Everone loses
 
Turning was lesson five in the syllabus when I taught flying.
I hope you young instructors can show the clips to your students.
My condolences to the family and friends of the departed.
Another sad day for flying.

flopter 27th Jan 2017 05:19

Some older vids of the plane.. certainly well decked out inside. Obviously, there Was a cockpit camera mounted inside at some stage, maybe they'll find one.

https://www.youtube.com/user/PedroMa...view=0&sort=dd

ContactMeNow 27th Jan 2017 05:21

A tragic event for the victims and for all who witnessed it on the day. No doubt something they will all never forget.

For airshows and the like, one would have thought it would be limited to essential crew only. Not too sure if the PIC's partner was part of the crew or just tagging along as a passenger?

Clare Prop 27th Jan 2017 06:09

Why bother with an investigation when local "expert" GT already has the answers, eg he "may have perceived a threat from another plane and put the plane into a steep turn to avoid a potential collision" :ugh:

RIP

allthecoolnamesarego 27th Jan 2017 06:10

Got a link to that quote?
Is that really what he said???

PoppaJo 27th Jan 2017 07:01

Was skeptical of the above GT sarcasm but nope he did say it. :ugh:

Perth Australia Day plane crash: Seaplane ?stalled before crash? | Perth Now

weloveseaplanes 27th Jan 2017 07:16

Happier days
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7yxv5eaddQ

ShyTorque 27th Jan 2017 07:29

From photographic and video evidence it does appear that the aircraft stalled in the turn to the left and an attempt was made to recover with use of aileron.

Obviously, not many have experienced stalling in the turn in a Grumman Mallard. I wonder how the type handles in those circumstances.

Tarq57 27th Jan 2017 09:19


Originally Posted by ShyTorque
Obviously, not many have experienced stalling in the turn in a Grumman Mallard. I wonder how the type handles in those circumstances.

It would appear to roll further into the turn while rapidly increasing its descent.

Duck Pilot 27th Jan 2017 09:38

Low level turn with a fair bit of downwind in a very heavy draggy piston radial twin in +40 degree temperatures isn't a good thing for performance. Haven't done the figures, however at a guess the pressure altitude would be at least 3000 feet! Couple that with any kind of substantial downwind below 500 feet in a low level turn will always result in something nasty.

Pinky the pilot 27th Jan 2017 09:41


It would appear to roll further into the turn while rapidly increasing its descent.
Does not any aircraft do much the same, given the same circumstances?:confused::hmm:

Duck Pilot; Well said.

Duck Pilot 27th Jan 2017 10:08

Thanks Pinky!!! I'm no flying instructor, but I know a lot about aircraft performance thanks to my 15 years flying in PNG. I've nearly killed myself at least 5 times that I can remember in Twin Otters and in one particular Bandit due to my lack of knowledge that come from inexperience.

Lots of lessons to be learnt from this very tragic accident.

nose,cabin 27th Jan 2017 10:09

Red bull air race

Similar situation with downwind sea breeze in a steep turn.
Density altitude is ISA plus 27 degrees is well over 3000feet.

Even without external events, not known, ie engine fail or traffic or birds etc and trying to comply with restrictive boundary limitations.

The Reason "Swiss cheese model" aligned a few holes.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6rR68OIpcX4

theheadmaster 27th Jan 2017 12:20

There is a difference between 'gusty conditions' and 'turning downwind'. Turning 'downwind' in a constant airmass with a fixed angle of bank is going to have the same performance impact as turning with the same angle of bank in a non-moving airmass. The ground track will, however, be different. Perception of groundtrack can cause a pilot to over-bank when turning downwind, causing problems. This is different from the mis-conception that you will 'lose airspeed turning downwind'.

Reminded me of the 1994 B52 crash due to nose drop in a steep turn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=182AepOJjMs

MakeItHappenCaptain 27th Jan 2017 12:36


Avation writer Geoffrey Thomas said the crash appeared to have been the result of what he described as a “classic stall” which occurred when the pilot made a sharp left turn at speed that was too slow.

“It appears to be a stall, where there is not enough airspeed over the wings to support the plane or the air over the wings has been disturbed and the lift is destroyed,” Thomas said.
Take note everyone. It has been determined that stalls are no longer caused by exceeding the critical angle of attack, but may also be now contributed to by spoilers...

nose,cabin 27th Jan 2017 13:10

"Turning 'downwind' in a constant airmass with a fixed angle of bank is going to have the same performance impact as turning with the same angle of bank in a non-moving airmass"

Please consider this as I have witnessed this many times. Ie holding in very strong winds.
I reduced angle of bank to prevent excessive IAS loss.

Ground speed heading west is IAS minus wind. ( the Perth Westerly, sea breeze can be quite strong in high temperature days)

Ground speed heading east is IAS plus wind.
Inertia must be increased quickly therefore IAS will drop until ground speed equals IAS plus wind.
Sometimes this requires over a 50 knot increase in a short time.


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:11.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.