PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   Merged: Cessna Clips House in Melbourne (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/423399-merged-cessna-clips-house-melbourne.html)

MArk Hemming 7th Aug 2010 06:56

Crash land near Moorabbin
 
Another close call @ YMMB - Cessna 2 POB "lands" in a backyard - fortunately no-one hurt

This will get the NIMBYs crowing again.

Plane crash-lands in backyard

Ex FSO GRIFFO 7th Aug 2010 08:07

Merged: Cessna Clips House in Melbourne
 
Heard on radio 6PR Perth this arvo.....

That A Cessna aircraft has clipped a house whilst attempting to land at YMMB, 20 yr old pilot and 60 yr old pax both OK,......
Score House 1, acft nil....


:}:}Rumoured to be listening to Hawks/Sy Game on radio and crashed in sympathy.....):{:{

Desert Flower 7th Aug 2010 08:08

Plane crashes in suburban back yard
 
From the Herald Sun


Miracle escape as plane crashes in back yard near Moorabbin airport
A PLANE has crash landed in the back yard of a house next to Moorabbin airport.
A female pilot in her 20s and a male in his 60s were lucky to escape unharmed.

Police said the four-seater Cessna clipped the roof of a house and then crashed into another house at 240 Lower Dandenong Rd.

It caused extensive damage and brought down powerlines before coming to a stop in the backyard.

Police said it was lucky no one was home at the time.

The plane ran out of fuel before crash landing, according to a Metropolitan Fire Brigade spokesman.

Moorabbin airport is behind the house.

The pilot and her passenger were treated for shock on the scene. No one else was injured.

"Considering the fact that it's come down in a back yard in the middle of suburbia, it's really quite a lucky escape,'' a police spokesman said.


Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
.End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.


Police, paramedics and fire trucks are at the scene.
Rego is KKW - a 152 belonging to the RVAC.

DF.

CLEAROF 7th Aug 2010 08:10

Moorabbin haters will love this one....
 
http://resources0.news.com.au/images...ssna-crash.jpg


The plane ran out of fuel before crash landing, according to a Metropolitan Fire Brigade spokesman.
Miracle escape as plane crashes in back yard near Moorabbin airport | Adelaide Now

Back Pressure 7th Aug 2010 08:25

Folks in the tower had a torrid time this arvo, what with this and the news choppers, the rescue plane, and then a Varieze with gear problems, as well as the hordes inbound from Carrum... Well done guys :ok:

Glad to see no-one hurt, so could have a chuckle at the comment from the firey "...before crash landing" - not much "landing" that I can see...

And yes, this is the same 152 that had a forced landing on the Capital golf course a few years back. IIRC that was fuel-related too...

Dangly Bits 7th Aug 2010 09:44

Who's is it?

Car RAMROD 7th Aug 2010 10:26

Yet another RVAC machine....

Same as the one that landed on Capital.


How are those 90-day checks working out?


Ah the memories from the previous thread on the RVAC prang at night into the trees short of the runway at MB not long ago. I'm waiting for the same negative response towards me!

ejet3 7th Aug 2010 10:33

Rvac have had a few accident/incidents lately UPS the 150 at Coldstream the 150 that had that midair also i think they had a 1 land at the golf course and a piper that landed off the runway at MB

Looks like no fire so maybe no fuel? anyway good job they both walked away! :)

Squeaks 7th Aug 2010 11:44

Both blades of the prop were completely undamaged in the images on Channel Nine tonight: seemed to indicate that the donk was certainly stopped at the time of impact, IMO.

Sunfish 7th Aug 2010 12:37

Thank you all for your unhelpful posts. The pilot and passenger are relatively unscathed. No one on the ground was injured.

Would you all like to add your little cup of petrol to the "Close YMMB" thread?

Maybe it might be better to shut up until you know what has occurred?

Maybe you might even like to consider the thousand hours flown per incident numbers before commenting?

Didn't think so.

Most of you have no idea what is significant statistically and what is not.

Biggles78 7th Aug 2010 12:43


Originally Posted by sunfish
Thank you all for your unhelpful posts. The pilot and passenger are relatively unscathed. No one on the ground was injured.

Would you all like to add your little cup of petrol to the "Close YMMB" thread?

Maybe it might be better to shut up until you know what has occurred?

Maybe you might even like to consider the thousand hours flown per incident numbers before commenting?

Didn't think so.

Most of you have no idea what is significant statistically and what is not.

Huh?? Another unhelpful post perhaps.

Horatio Leafblower 7th Aug 2010 12:53


Would you all like to add your little cup of petrol to the "Close YMMB" thread?
That horse has bolted, Sunfish. They needed the cups of petrol before the noise stopped! :E

Car RAMROD 7th Aug 2010 15:29

Sunfish, what about the thousands of hours flown and lesser number of incidents/accidents by other MB schools?


RVAC seem to have had more prangs at MB & surrounds than anyone else in recent years. Don't hate me for stating the obvious; but I'm more than prepared for the barrage of negative replies from the people who take offence to hearing the truth (especially after the thread about the Warrior that went bush-bashing).


Obviously speculation, but I wonder if those 90-day checks didn't catch this one out?


HL, love it!
Back Pressure, MB tower are tops! :ok:


Glad everyone is ok, obviously.
Close MB? Hell no.

AirBumps 7th Aug 2010 22:41


Maybe you might even like to consider the thousand hours flown per incident numbers before commenting?
There are some very big schools down at MB, flying lots and lots of hours. How do RVAC incident stats stack up against the others?

Perhaps they need to bring the 90 day check down to 30 days - that will fix it.

Ted D Bear 7th Aug 2010 23:42

Wow - you can get a 152 into a backyard that small! :cool:

ejet3 8th Aug 2010 02:35


Sunfish, what about the thousands of hours flown and lesser number of incidents/accidents by other MB schools?
Look at OAA most of us hate them BUT they have what 40-50 aircraft made up of c172, c182 and pa44 etc most if not all are flying all day ever day, and they haven't had the number of accidents or incidents Rvac have had over the years!

Casa should come down on RVAC it’s simply not good enough! if they did run out of fuel that wouldn’t have been the first time :=

PeterTG 8th Aug 2010 03:56

Ummm - Carby heat???:E

prospector 8th Aug 2010 04:04

" Wow - you can get a 152 into a backyard that small! "

That's the easy part, getting it out is what requires an inordinate amount of skill, probably by a swing wing driver.

remoak 8th Aug 2010 07:10


Would you all like to add your little cup of petrol to the "Close YMMB" thread?

Maybe it might be better to shut up until you know what has occurred?
We do know what has occurred, an aircraft hit a house. WHY it occurred is irrelevant to the "close YMMB" crowd - the fact that it did is all they need.

gezza182 8th Aug 2010 07:56

I think that is not a fair comparison. Sure OAA might have 40 - 50 aircraft flying every day. But the vast majority of OAA's flying is training related. Whereas a high percentage of RVAC's flying is by "weekend warriors".

In fact, with the demise of other big operators, Schutts, Combined, Civil etc, my guess is that nowadays the RVAC has a much higher proportion (in relation to the the total number) of recreational flyers than it did in the past.

Perhaps this is where the perceived problem lies.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:22.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.