Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Airplane With The Nicest Handling

The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Airplane With The Nicest Handling

Old 1st Oct 2021, 15:46
  #21 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 721
Best single piston in order: Chipmunk, RV6, Piston Provost Worst by far : Tipsy Nipper

Best Twin Piston - Dove, PA30 nice in the air but had "issues" for take-off and landing

Best Jet : A330 hands down Worst by far : B737-200

Last edited by Meikleour; 1st Oct 2021 at 17:48. Reason: spacing
Meikleour is online now  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 16:56
  #22 (permalink)  
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Within 2hrs drive of LHR (most of the time)
Posts: 21
I’ve flown lots of the types mentioned above and concur that the Baron and King Air 90/200 were very nice. However, the one aircraft that stands out from all the many types I’ve flown, is the 747-400. It was sublime. How did they make such a large aircraft handle so well? Unfortunately to experience that now you’ll have to become a
freight dog or a Middle East Vip’s slave.
Captain Fishy is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 17:04
  #23 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Utterly insignificant little blue-green planet, unregarded yellow sun, unfashionable end, western spiral arm, Milky Way
Age: 36
Posts: 269
Bücker Jungmann and Saab Safir. Both designed by the same gentleman. After those, the Chipmunk.
semmern is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 18:35
  #24 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,125
Always liked the Beaver and Cessna 185 on either wheels or floats.
Only got about 1 hr in the Chipmunk and it was really, really nice.
albatross is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 18:43
  #25 (permalink)  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 6,840
Never having handled one, what was it that was so nice about the Chipmunk ? Genuine question.
WHBM is online now  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 18:49
  #26 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 732
I think that if this thread appeared on some other forums as well there would be aircraft from other categories that would appear. Within the scope of what has been said already I would agree with the Chipmunk for a light aircraft, the B747 for a large aircraft especially the -100, and the Hunter is my all time favourite aeroplane although whilst in some flight regimes it is outstanding in others it is challenging. For hand flying I have to say that the most unpleasant aeroplane for me was the Cirrus SR22 although as a fast, economical IFR aircraft with the autopilot engaged it was very good.
LOMCEVAK is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 19:12
  #27 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Uranus
Posts: 333
Originally Posted by WHBM View Post
Never having handled one, what was it that was so nice about the Chipmunk ? Genuine question.
I can't find my 3822 (Air Cadet log book) right now but my first ever aircraft that I actually handled was a Chippy in 1994 at 12 AEF RAF Turnhouse near Edinburgh.

That's 27 years since I was first talked through a barrel roll pointing towards Edin, and honestly not having you on when I say I can still 'feel' the weighting, crispness of response and the harmonisation as I type this. Even in my inexperienced hands it was sensational.

Like car handling, some just have that little bit extra where you know exactly where you are with it - think an early Mazda MX5 vs a BMW Z4.

Shaft109 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 19:36
  #28 (permalink)  
Join Date: May 2000
Location: The Harvest Moon
Posts: 1,869
Beagle Pup 150… because I own one and it must surely be the easiest and overall delightful of planes to fly and look at.

It’s not fast, it’s not hugely aerobatic but it’s just fab.
Rocket Ron is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 19:38
  #29 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,098
Limited FW time (500 hrs), soloed in a Chipmunk, 20 hrs in T-34 and 170 in T-28 and thought the three of them much of a muchness, of course the latter won out for the power, few hours in RV's, nice. Always thought the T-34 would have been a wonderful private aircraft, most bits were the same as a Bonanza. In the time in Cessnas thought the straight tail 172, 175, 182 were nice handling machines which were spoiled some how when they went to the swept fin, crowbar flaps too, and 40°, who said electric is progress?
megan is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 19:57
  #30 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SE Qld, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,040
That's easy - Chipmunk above all.

I appreciate that these are subjective, but I'm unsure how anyone can describe the B747 as "sublime" - having been made to convert back to the B744 from the delightful B777, I thought the former was a truck!

And if we're talking about twins, yes the Baron was very nice but my favorite is the F.27, noisy, cumbersome and a pig in a crosswind, but then there was the pleasure of knowing you were flying it well...
Dora-9 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 19:58
  #31 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 326
The Chipmunk seems to be everyone's favourite - I can only concur. If only it had a bit more power...

Cessna Caravan handles excellently - I'm surprised it hasn;t been mentioned yet. I haven't flown her much, but seemed to be the most hamronized airplane ever. The control forces and control response are just right - not too high, not to low - perfectly balanced. Easier to fly than C-152

My all time favourite - Extra 330 SC - a hard riding [email protected] (to quote the late 'Duke Elegant'), she'll obediently do whatever you can imagine and then some stuff you can't...

- I'm surprised A330 got so many mentions - very docile and absolute pleasure to land, but at the same time awfully sluggish on the controls, esp. in roll
- A320 is fun to fly, except in gusty crosswinds. There are plenty of YouTube videos to prove it.
- 787 handles very nicely, tough in my opinion it neither flies like an FBW airplane, nor like a normal one. Haven't flown any other Boeings, so can't compare

- Hughes 300 is beautifully responsive and handles like a dream. However due to small and light rotor it's not as good in autorotation
- Bell 47 is completely opposite. Handles like a slug, but awesome in autos

Havent had a chance to fly fighter jets - only F16 simulator. It handled surprisingly similar to the A320...

Last edited by Sidestick_n_Rudder; 1st Oct 2021 at 20:19.
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 20:37
  #32 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 11 GROUP
Age: 74
Posts: 1,159
If we are talking 'handling' has to be the Druine Turbulent. (figertip control)
POBJOY is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 22:51
  #33 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 198
146. Just a big 172 with four fans. Great landings, not all of which I deserved.
Consol is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 23:05
  #34 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 46
Chipmunk ….. definitely !
hei yu is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2021, 23:51
  #35 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Aus
Posts: 86
C208 and AC680FL for me.

The AC500 was by far the best piston twin I flew, but the 680 is much lighter, and nicer on the controls.

Dash8-200 was very nice.
Switchbait is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2021, 01:10
  #36 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 353
Aero Commander 500S on low level coastal surveillance and Fokker F-28 in PNG (sometimes just as low) 😄
ad-astra is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2021, 01:10
  #37 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 56
I vote for the Pitts S-2C Welcome to Adobe GoLive 6

Some considerations described here https://www.kitplanes.com/back-to-school/
David J Pilkington is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2021, 01:20
  #38 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 73
Originally Posted by WHBM View Post
Never having handled one, what was it that was so nice about the Chipmunk ? Genuine question.
Good question. For me it was the lightness and directness of the controls. Almost as if you just need to think what you want it to do, and you were there. Not the world’s fastest aircraft but it feels very sprightly.

Can’t recommend it highly enough.

I’ve always heard good things about de Havilland aircraft. There are a few mentioned here. I wonder if it is a design ethos of the company. Same with Beechcraft.
Flyer517 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2021, 01:54
  #39 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 0A
Posts: 8,148
Mirage III.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2021, 03:06
  #40 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 277
Originally Posted by Capn Bloggs View Post
Mirage III.
This guy wins the internet for the day.
havick is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.