Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

What are aviation degree students being told?

The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

What are aviation degree students being told?

Old 15th Mar 2021, 00:26
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 681
Received 107 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by George Glass
Hello ?
Reality calling.

DO NOT listen to academics or flying school spruikers.
QF has had most crew stood down for a year. Domestic is slowly coming back but can fall back into the crater as soon as some idiot Premier decides to close the borders again. Noticed what’s happening in QLD and NSW ?
QF International is dead in the water and will take years to recover. The A380s will probably never fly again.
Virgin International is finished. Permanently.
The effect of this pandemic on Aviation and Tourism is beyond catastrophic and will take many , many years to recover.
Go and do something else.
What rubbish. This, like EVERY other downturn will change direction.

Either be ready to join the wave - or don’t, but the wave will come regardless.
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 00:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Age: 68
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
What rubbish. This, like EVERY other downturn will change direction.

Either be ready to join the wave - or don’t, but the wave will come regardless.
There are QF A380 Captains driving buses. There are displaced A380 F/Os and Second officers that will be rehired before any new hires.There are B747 pilots yet to go through the QF reduction in numbers process. Virgin has shut down its whole international division. Tiger is gone.There are expats retuning from Emirates , Cathay etc.
Believe what you like. There will be a surplus of experienced jet pilots in Australia for the foreseeable future.
George Glass is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 01:14
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: everywhere
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lucille
If you’re going to do a degree, at least do a proper one - one from any of the STEM disciplines. Then go spend your $100K on flying lessons. This degree will make you a far better pilot in the long term.

A MECIR with 200 hours TT is a joke, you’re uninsurable and only your daddy will employ you.

It’s no coincidence that the providers of aviation degrees are mostly former hairdressing colleges now calling themselves universities.
Dont know about training standards down under but in Europe 200hrs is the point to advance onto turboprops/medium range jets. All works well here and I had no issues starting in an airline at that 'experience' level. I actually had 160TT when I flew my first passengers in a turboprop.

Anyway I agree the shortage is a scam the world over. I hate reading it and wish it could somehow be classed as false advertising and made illegal. A hiring boom is NOT a shortage. I have heard anecdotally that the US did actually have a shortage around 3 years back, though I don't know of any shortage to have occurred in Europe at least!

A320LGW is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 02:33
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 247
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
It’s not just University that sell these stories, flying schools (not all) are equally as bad. At the end of the day they are a business and want your money through the door. As with all things it’s buyer beware. The people who sign up need to take some responsibility for their actions or lack of career investigation.
engine out is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 04:38
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Montréal
Posts: 72
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by engine out
It’s not just University that sell these stories, flying schools (not all) are equally as bad. At the end of the day they are a business and want your money through the door. As with all things it’s buyer beware. The people who sign up need to take some responsibility for their actions or lack of career investigation.
"Money flows naturally from the pocket of the dumb to the pocket of the smart" is one way to define business ethics. There are other ways, but they require legislation.
Petit-Lion is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 05:06
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane, Qld
Posts: 1,370
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by A320LGW
Dont know about training standards down under but in Europe 200hrs is the point to advance onto turboprops/medium range jets. All works well here and I had no issues starting in an airline at that 'experience' level. I actually had 160TT when I flew my first passengers in a turboprop.

Anyway I agree the shortage is a scam the world over. I hate reading it and wish it could somehow be classed as false advertising and made illegal. A hiring boom is NOT a shortage. I have heard anecdotally that the US did actually have a shortage around 3 years back, though I don't know of any shortage to have occurred in Europe at least!
No offence, but there was a reason why the Buffalo crash in the US made them take stock on experience levels for crews. A lot of Pilots might be fine at 160TT but honestly, at that point you're still a very unknown quantity and I think the industry has been riding on past experienced crew for far too long and hoping for the best.

In relation to Universities and what they're telling students, we recently had one posting on here about being told to go do a "Jet Orientation Course" and MCC with about 200hrs TT. I personally did a single semester at a Uni about 12years ago when they were still relatively new and it was awful, lots of talk about Qantas Cadetships which never came about in any meaningful fashion and plenty of courses that were completely irrelevant to Aviation let alone being a Pilot along with people involved who really had no idea, seems like not a lot has changed tbh.
Ixixly is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 06:12
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: NSW
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely the Qantas cadets being pumped out of FTA Tawoomba will have a more direct route into Qlink or mainline... surely? They paid the money, and I’m sure were promised the world, not guaranteed anything of course. The first group were even named “the golden 11” to make everyone feel special.
Seriously all jokes aside, it would be good business to get those first groups jobs at qantas ASAP, at least to show future wannabes at FTA that there is a chance after signing up, and therefore guaranteeing fta a more secure future income until the contract with qantas runs its course/ pandemic disappears.
TheBlackHand is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 06:44
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Age: 68
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the sh#t hits the fan on a dark and stormy night and the bloke in the right hand seat has 200 hours TT its single pilot IFR if your in the left hand seat. Been there. I don’t know how the regulatory authorities have let it happen. Glad I’m retiring soon. The industry ain’t what it used to be.
Very sad.
George Glass is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 12:58
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Ixixly has hit the mail on the head. It’s especially humoring to hear that a lot of the instructors teaching MCC have never flown in a two pilot operation in their life.
havick is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 20:31
  #30 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,270
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Ixixly
No offence, but there was a reason why the Buffalo crash in the US made them take stock on experience levels for crews. A lot of Pilots might be fine at 160TT but honestly, at that point you're still a very unknown quantity and I think the industry has been riding on past experienced crew for far too long and hoping for the best.

In relation to Universities and what they're telling students, we recently had one posting on here about being told to go do a "Jet Orientation Course" and MCC with about 200hrs TT. I personally did a single semester at a Uni about 12years ago when they were still relatively new and it was awful, lots of talk about Qantas Cadetships which never came about in any meaningful fashion and plenty of courses that were completely irrelevant to Aviation let alone being a Pilot along with people involved who really had no idea, seems like not a lot has changed tbh.
Why did experience (or the lack off) have any relevance to Buffalo?

Incompetence, poor training yes, but experience no
ZFT is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 22:32
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,285
Received 348 Likes on 189 Posts
Originally Posted by ZFT
Why did experience (or the lack off) have any relevance to Buffalo?

Incompetence, poor training yes, but experience no
Truth. Colgan 3407 was not caused by fresh CPL new hires who were an unknown quantity. Both pilots had prior professional flying experience before joining Colgan. The Captain had failed multiple prior checks which he didn’t disclose to Colgan, so he definitely wasn’t a “known” quantity to them. The FO had previous experience as a flying instructor in sunny Arizona, which didn’t really help out in a Buffalo NY snowstorm.

To an airline a 5-10,000hr pilot is only a known quantity for as much as you can glean from them during a brief selection process, many an airline has recruited a high houred pilot only to discover the person they thought they were hiring was not the person who existed in reality.

Not only does the rest of the world outside of the USA put low time pilots into the FO seat, it’s been going on in Australia for decades at a rate higher than most posters here would realise. Norwegians, Swedes, Finns other Europeans can put low houred CPLs into the RHS of a big turboprop or jet and have them operate in poor winter conditions in near perfect safety.

A thorough selection process combined with standardised and appropriate training and oversight avoids the problems which led to a Colgan 3407 crash.

Last edited by dr dre; 15th Mar 2021 at 22:43.
dr dre is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2021, 22:42
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: everywhere
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ixixly
No offence, but there was a reason why the Buffalo crash in the US made them take stock on experience levels for crews. A lot of Pilots might be fine at 160TT but honestly, at that point you're still a very unknown quantity and I think the industry has been riding on past experienced crew for far too long and hoping for the best.

In relation to Universities and what they're telling students, we recently had one posting on here about being told to go do a "Jet Orientation Course" and MCC with about 200hrs TT. I personally did a single semester at a Uni about 12years ago when they were still relatively new and it was awful, lots of talk about Qantas Cadetships which never came about in any meaningful fashion and plenty of courses that were completely irrelevant to Aviation let alone being a Pilot along with people involved who really had no idea, seems like not a lot has changed tbh.
No offence taken at all. Regarding the Buffalo incident, the Captain had 3,400hrs and the FO had 2,300hrs. They both exceeded the 1,500hr rule that was allegedly brought in to stop a reoccurrence, in other words as far as experience goes there is nothing about these new rules today that would have stopped those two pilots sitting together in the same cockpit doing the same thing.

Beyond the first few hundred hours it is mainly raw skill and quality of training that dictate the quality of the pilot. You know as well as I do that there are 500hr FOs out there performing better than some 2,000hr FOs.

Again referring back to the Colgan/Buffalo incident, the real question is how a fully qualified crew managed to end up in such a situation. What about training and checking? It sounds like that failed. I did not hear of protests and lobbying to review training and checking procedures though, this would have made far more sense as it was ultimately the reason that plane crashed.

Last edited by A320LGW; 15th Mar 2021 at 22:58.
A320LGW is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 01:33
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,468
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by A320LGW
Dont know about training standards down under but in Europe 200hrs is the point to advance onto turboprops/medium range jets. All works well here and I had no issues starting in an airline at that 'experience' level. I actually had 160TT when I flew my first passengers in a turboprop.

Anyway I agree the shortage is a scam the world over. I hate reading it and wish it could somehow be classed as false advertising and made illegal. A hiring boom is NOT a shortage. I have heard anecdotally that the US did actually have a shortage around 3 years back, though I don't know of any shortage to have occurred in Europe at least!
The reason we don’t generally have low hour pilots going into the right seat in Australia is not because we think they aren’t capable of it, but we don’t have to do it. There’s a GA industry here that forms the basis of a lot of careers and provides that initial experience that then flows up the industry.

I know the argument about “what relevance does flying a 210 have with flying an A320”, and yes there’s not a lot of relevance in some ways. But I’ve flown with F/O’s with both backgrounds, and it’s beyond the SOP’s where the one with more experience will prove their worth. Problem solving, lateral thinking, workload management, just a few things that come with an experienced pilot.

While there’s hundreds of highly experienced pilots driving buses, there will be very little need to put low time pilots in the right seat in Australia
morno is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 01:58
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,070
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
While there’s hundreds of highly experienced pilots driving buses, there will be very little need to put low time pilots in the right seat in Australia
Well that all depends on what you might get paid. A few people I have spoken to recently are seriously thinking of walking away from aviation as their previous career/business actually is paying the same or more than their aviation one at the moment. Whilst they will probably make more money in the long run flying, the perception is that it isn't worth the hassle of everything that goes with it. Weekends off, No Sim, No CVRs, No nightshift etc for 75-85% of pilot pay is starting to look appealing to some people. Additional to that if you are in business your tax bill decreases somewhat.

Last edited by neville_nobody; 16th Mar 2021 at 02:20.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 02:24
  #35 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 15 Posts
The USA 1500 rule was touted as lifting standards in the cockpit. This wasn't necessarily true. What it was about was improvements to pay and work rules. A 200 hour fresh CPL will work for next to nothing to fly a jet. With 1500 hours they value their experience and expect a more than $1600 a month to live on (the FO wages at the time). You also can't live in most US major cities on that money so people lived at home and commuted to work on jumpseats and slept in crew rooms because they couldn't afford a hotel for a day off between trips.

And judging by pay and contracts now it seems to have worked.
Climb150 is online now  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 03:05
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,285
Received 348 Likes on 189 Posts
Originally Posted by morno
But I’ve flown with F/O’s with both backgrounds, and it’s beyond the SOP’s where the one with more experience will prove their worth. Problem solving, lateral thinking, workload management, just a few things that come with an experienced pilot.
An experienced pilot could also bring bad habits, poor attitudes, change resistance, an unwillingness to adapt to new methods etc. Much easier to sort out a poor attitude early on in a career if the training oversight is thorough enough to identify those weaknesses. Lateral thinking and those other personal traits in a way are natural aspects of personality irrelevant to how much prior experience you have.

While there’s hundreds of highly experienced pilots driving buses, there will be very little need to put low time pilots in the right seat in Australia
I think it's more geared towards recruitment once the industry goes back toward normal. But even then those who've trained at one of the various airline linked academies will be first in line for recruitment. After they've been processed only then will pilots out in the industry be considered.
dr dre is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 05:09
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,468
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by dr dre
An experienced pilot could also bring bad habits, poor attitudes, change resistance, an unwillingness to adapt to new methods etc. Much easier to sort out a poor attitude early on in a career if the training oversight is thorough enough to identify those weaknesses. Lateral thinking and those other personal traits in a way are natural aspects of personality irrelevant to how much prior experience you have.
Ahh yes, because an airline pilot never develops bad habits, unwillingness to adapt to new methods etc.

What’s to say an experienced pilot can’t adapt? And then have the added bonus of experience to be able to critically asses a situation.

It’s an age old argument, but I’ve flown with experienced pilots and cadet pilots in the right seat, and as an overall package, I’ll in most circumstances take the experienced pilot on a dark stormy night.
morno is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 13:03
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,788
Received 112 Likes on 54 Posts
I'm happier with cadets in the RHS on a dark and stormy night because they keep quiet and let me get on with it.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 15:46
  #39 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Handmaiden
 
Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 4,669
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
Yes dear. I remember that tale you told me when you saw an innocuous looking cloud. FO suggested a heading change. You said "nah, she'll be right. I know clouds". Cue quite a thumping from the innocuous cloud.
"so... tell me again about those thousands of hours you have?"
redsnail is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 15:48
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,788
Received 112 Likes on 54 Posts
That's called "experience".
Checkboard is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.